Literature DB >> 32038813

The Emergence of Behavioral Testing of Fishes to Measure Toxicological Effects.

Janie S Brooks1,2.   

Abstract

Historically, research in toxicology has utilized non-human mammalian species, particularly rats and mice, to study in vivo the effects of toxic exposure on physiology and behavior. However, ethical considerations and the overwhelming increase in the number of chemicals to be screened has led to a shift away from in vivo work. The decline in in vivo experimentation has been accompanied by an increase in alternative methods for detecting and predicting detrimental effects: in vitro experimentation and in silico modeling. Yet, these new methodologies can not replace the need for in vivo work on animal physiology and behavior. The development of new, non-mammalian model systems shows great promise in restoring our ability to use behavioral endpoints in toxicological testing. Of these systems, the zebrafish, Danio rerio, is the model organism for which we are accumulating enough knowledge in vivo, in vitro, and in silico to enable us to develop a comprehensive, highthroughput toxicology screening system. © Korean Society of Toxicology 2009.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior; Danio rerio; Operational definitions; Toxicology; Zebrafish

Year:  2009        PMID: 32038813      PMCID: PMC7006293          DOI: 10.5487/TR.2009.25.1.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Res        ISSN: 1976-8257


  34 in total

Review 1.  In vitro toxicology methods: impact on regulation from technical and scientific advancements.

Authors:  A Carere; A Stammati; F Zucco
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 2.  Currently available in vitro methods used in the regulatory toxicology.

Authors:  Manfred Liebsch; Horst Spielmann
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 4.372

3.  Behavioral screening assays in zebrafish.

Authors:  Michael B Orger; Ethan Gahtan; Akira Muto; Patrick Page-McCaw; Matthew C Smear; Herwig Baier
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 4.  Use of computer-assisted prediction of toxic effects of chemical substances.

Authors:  Brigitte Simon-Hettich; Andreas Rothfuss; Thomas Steger-Hartmann
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 5.  Zebrafish in functional genomics and aquatic biomedicine.

Authors:  Peter Aleström; Jethro L Holter; Rasoul Nourizadeh-Lillabadi
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 6.  Toxicity testing: creating a revolution based on new technologies.

Authors:  Nirmala Bhogal; Christina Grindon; Robert Combes; Michael Balls
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 7.  Animal behavioral methods in neurotoxicity assessment: SGOMSEC joint report.

Authors:  B Kulig; E Alleva; G Bignami; J Cohn; D Cory-Slechta; V Landa; J O'Donoghue; D Peakall
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Linking genes to brain, behavior and neurological diseases: what can we learn from zebrafish?

Authors:  S Guo
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.449

Review 9.  Principles of identifying and characterizing neurotoxicity.

Authors:  R C MacPhail
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.372

10.  Non-associative learning in larval zebrafish.

Authors:  Jonathan D Best; Stéphane Berghmans; Julia J F G Hunt; Samantha C Clarke; Angeleen Fleming; Paul Goldsmith; Alan G Roach
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.