Literature DB >> 16707203

Use of computer-assisted prediction of toxic effects of chemical substances.

Brigitte Simon-Hettich1, Andreas Rothfuss, Thomas Steger-Hartmann.   

Abstract

The current revision of the European policy for the evaluation of chemicals (REACH) has lead to a controversy with regard to the need of additional animal safety testing. To avoid increases in animal testing but also to save time and resources, alternative in silico or in vitro tests for the assessment of toxic effects of chemicals are advocated. The draft of the original document issued in 29th October 2003 by the European Commission foresees the use of alternative methods but does not give further specification on which methods should be used. Computer-assisted prediction models, so-called predictive tools, besides in vitro models, will likely play an essential role in the proposed repertoire of "alternative methods". The current discussion has urged the Advisory Committee of the German Toxicology Society to present its position on the use of predictive tools in toxicology. Acceptable prediction models already exist for those toxicological endpoints which are based on well-understood mechanism, such as mutagenicity and skin sensitization, whereas mechanistically more complex endpoints such as acute, chronic or organ toxicities currently cannot be satisfactorily predicted. A potential strategy to assess such complex toxicities will lie in their dissection into models for the different steps or pathways leading to the final endpoint. Integration of these models should result in a higher predictivity. Despite these limitations, computer-assisted prediction tools already today play a complementary role for the assessment of chemicals for which no data is available or for which toxicological testing is impractical due to the lack of availability of sufficient compounds for testing. Furthermore, predictive tools offer support in the screening and the subsequent prioritization of compound for further toxicological testing, as expected within the scope of the European REACH program. This program will also lead to the collection of high-quality data which will broaden the database for further (Q)SAR approaches and will in turn increase the predictivity of predictive tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16707203     DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2006.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  7 in total

Review 1.  Computer-aided drug discovery and development (CADDD): in silico-chemico-biological approach.

Authors:  I M Kapetanovic
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 5.192

2.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy.

Authors:  Daniel Krewski; Daniel Acosta; Melvin Andersen; Henry Anderson; John C Bailar; Kim Boekelheide; Robert Brent; Gail Charnley; Vivian G Cheung; Sidney Green; Karl T Kelsey; Nancy I Kerkvliet; Abby A Li; Lawrence McCray; Otto Meyer; Reid D Patterson; William Pennie; Robert A Scala; Gina M Solomon; Martin Stephens; James Yager; Lauren Zeise
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.393

3.  Development, validation, and use of quantitative structure-activity relationship models of 5-hydroxytryptamine (2B) receptor ligands to identify novel receptor binders and putative valvulopathic compounds among common drugs.

Authors:  Rima Hajjo; Christopher M Grulke; Alexander Golbraikh; Vincent Setola; Xi-Ping Huang; Bryan L Roth; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Hierarchical virtual screening for the discovery of new molecular scaffolds in antibacterial hit identification.

Authors:  Pedro J Ballester; Martina Mangold; Nigel I Howard; Richard L Marchese Robinson; Chris Abell; Jochen Blumberger; John B O Mitchell
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Assessment of quantitative structure-activity relationship of toxicity prediction models for Korean chemical substance control legislation.

Authors:  Kwang-Yon Kim; Seong Eun Shin; Kyoung Tai No
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2015-06-12

Review 6.  The Emergence of Behavioral Testing of Fishes to Measure Toxicological Effects.

Authors:  Janie S Brooks
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2009-03-01

7.  Prediction of acute mammalian toxicity using QSAR methods: a case study of sulfur mustard and its breakdown products.

Authors:  Patricia Ruiz; Gino Begluitti; Terry Tincher; John Wheeler; Moiz Mumtaz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.