| Literature DB >> 32038388 |
Zheng Zheng1, Wenyue Han1, Yawen Li1, Dongyan Wang1, Simeng Gu2, Fushun Wang3.
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to explore the relationship between depression and disordered eating in female undergraduates and the mediating role of coping style between depression and disordered eating. Self-report questionnaires assessing coping style, disordered eating, and depression were completed in 646 Chinese female undergraduates. The results illustrated that there were obvious differences in disordered eating among the undergraduates with various majors. The disordered eating in female undergraduates majoring in art was more serious than those in other majors. Depression and coping style were effective indicators to predict disordered eating. Moreover, depression could not only directly predict disordered eating, but also predict disordered eating through the mediating effect of coping style. These findings indicate that depression and negative coping style are associated with disordered eating. Coping style could mediate the effect of depression on disordered eating, as these may be an important target for early intervention programs for eating disorder (ED).Entities:
Keywords: coping style; depression; disordered eating; eating disorder; mediating effect
Year: 2020 PMID: 32038388 PMCID: PMC6985573 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Comparison of scores of EDI among female college students of different majors.
| Major | ① ( | ② ( | ③ ( | ④ ( | ||
| EDI | 44.81 ± 18.78 | 42.19 ± 17.94 | 50.07 ± 23.80 | 47.66 ± 19.22 | 3.42∗ | ③>①∗∗, ③>②∗, ④>②∗ |
| DT | 4.23 ± 4.10 | 4.19 ± 4.29 | 8.13 ± 5.62 | 5.48 ± 4.47 | 16.52∗∗∗ | ③>①∗∗∗, ③>②∗∗∗, ③>④∗∗∗ ④>①∗∗, ④>②∗ |
| BD | 11.59 ± 6.19 | 10.33 ± 5.76 | 11.82 ± 5.51 | 13.07 ± 6.51 | 5.28∗∗ | ③>①∗, ③>②∗∗∗ |
| Bulimia | 2.08 ± 2.65 | 2.04 ± 2.45 | 3.31 ± 5.00 | 2.07 ± 2.63 | 3.73∗ | ③>①∗∗, ③>②∗∗, ③>④∗∗ |
Means and standard deviation (SD) of continuous variables.
| Variables | ||
| EDI (eating disorder inventory) | 45.76 | 19.46 |
| DT (drive for thinness) | 5.05 | 4.60 |
| BD (body dissatisfaction) | 11.83 | 6.19 |
| Bulimia | 2.20 | 2.98 |
| Perfectionism | 5.27 | 3.58 |
| ID (interpersonal distrust) | 3.72 | 3.23 |
| MF (mature fear) | 8.26 | 4.36 |
| IA (interoceptive awareness) | 4.72 | 4.37 |
| Inefficacy | 4.70 | 4.10 |
| Coping style | –0.09 | 1.35 |
| Depression | 5.31 | 3.07 |
Pearson’s correlation of various variables.
| Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1. EDI | 1 | ||||||||||
| 2. DT | 0.66∗∗∗ | 1 | |||||||||
| 3. BD | 0.60∗∗∗ | 0.51∗∗∗ | 1 | ||||||||
| 4. Bulimia | 0.57∗∗∗ | 0.41∗∗∗ | 0.17∗ | 1 | |||||||
| 5. Perfectionism | 0.50∗∗∗ | 0.27∗∗∗ | 0.11∗∗ | 0.31∗∗∗ | 1 | ||||||
| 6. ID | 0.37∗∗∗ | −0.08∗ | −0.01 | 0.10∗ | 0.09∗ | 1 | |||||
| 7. MF | 0.47∗∗∗ | 0.16∗∗∗ | 0.14∗∗∗ | 0.17∗∗∗ | 0.15∗∗∗ | 0.07 | 1 | ||||
| 8. IA | 0.76∗∗∗ | 0.37∗∗∗ | 0.20∗∗∗ | 0.46∗∗∗ | 0.39∗∗∗ | 0.35∗∗∗ | 0.28∗∗∗ | 1 | |||
| 9. Inefficacy | 0.64∗∗∗ | 0.18∗∗∗ | 0.20∗∗∗ | 0.25∗∗∗ | 0.18∗∗∗ | 0.48∗∗∗ | 0.19∗∗∗ | 0.59∗∗∗ | 1 | ||
| 10. Coping style | −0.28∗∗∗ | −0.072 | −0.03∗∗∗ | −0.18∗∗∗ | 0.05 | −0.31∗∗∗ | −0.11∗∗ | −0.30∗∗∗ | −0.43∗∗∗ | 1 | |
| 11. Depression | 0.31∗∗∗ | 0.03 | 0.005 | 0.15∗∗∗ | 0.08∗ | 0.42∗∗∗ | 0.06 | 0.35∗∗∗ | 0.48∗∗∗ | −0.42∗∗∗ | 1 |
The mediating effect test of coping style.
| Regression equation ( | Fit index | Coefficient | |||
| significance | |||||
| Result variable | Prediction | ||||
| variable | |||||
| Disordered eating | Depression | 0.096 | 68.207∗∗∗ | 0.3095 | 8.259∗∗∗ |
| Coping style | Depression | 0.179 | 139.93∗∗∗ | –0.4225 | –11.829∗∗∗ |
| Disordered eating | Coping style | 0.122 | 44.5∗∗∗ | –0.1773 | –4.347∗∗∗ |
| Depression | 0.2346 | 5.752∗∗∗ | |||
Analysis of total effect, direct effect, and indirect effect.
| Effect | Boot | Boot CI | Boot CI | Relative | |
| value | SE | lower | upper | effect value | |
| Total effect | 0.309 | 0.042 | 0.246 | 0.391 | |
| Direct effect | 0.235 | 0.041 | 0.154 | 0.315 | 75.8% |
| Indirect effect | 0.075 | 0.022 | 0.034 | 0.118 | 24.2% |
FIGURE 1The mediating effect of coping style on depression and disordered eating.