| Literature DB >> 32351552 |
Yige Liu1, Hongfan Li1, Xiayue Xu1, Yukun Li1, Zhutao Wang1, Huan Zhu1, Xia Zhang2, Shan Jiang2, Naling Li2, Simeng Gu1, Fushun Wang2,3, Jason H Huang3,4.
Abstract
Previously, we have shown that neuromodulators are important factors in stress-induced emotional disorders, such as depression, for example, serotonin is the major substance for depression. Many psychological studies have proved that depression is due to insecure attachment. In addition, sleep is a major symptom of depression. Furthermore, serotonin is the substrate for both sleep and depression. To explore the role of sleep in the relationships between insecure attachment and depression, we investigated 755 college students with Close Relationship Inventory, Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Self-rated Depression Scale, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The results showed that (1) insecure attachment positively predicted poor sleep quality; (2) sleep quality partially affected depression, possibly due the same stress neuromodulators such as norepinephrine and cortisol; and (3) cognitive reappraisal moderated the mediating path leading from attachment anxiety to poor sleep quality. These findings highlight the moderating role of cognitive reappraisal in the effects of attachment anxiety on sleep quality and finally on depression. In conclusion, sleep quality links attachment anxiety and emotional disorders.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32351552 PMCID: PMC7178506 DOI: 10.1155/2020/1931737
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Figure 1The hypothetical model.
Means, standard Deviations, and correlations for all variables (N = 755).
|
|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Avoidance | 2.82 | 0.84 | — | ||||
| (2) Anxiety | 3.68 | 1.05 | 0.29∗∗ | — | |||
| (3) Depression | 3.83 | 0.59 | 0.16∗∗ | 0.33∗ | — | ||
| (4) Cognitive reappraisal | 5.22 | 0.99 | -0.17∗∗ | 0.01 | 0.04 | — | |
| (5) Sleep quality | 6.37 | 2.72 | 0.16∗∗ | 0.23∗∗ | 0.27∗∗ | 0.02 | — |
Note: ∗∗p < 0.01.
Multiple regression analyses for the indirect effect of sleep.
| Regression | Fix index | Significance of regression coefficient | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable | Independent variable |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sleep quality | Avoidance | 0.24 | 0.06 | 23.76∗∗∗ | 0.32 | 0.69 | 5.28∗∗∗ | 2.68∗∗ |
| Anxiety | 0.51 | 0.32 | 0.69 | 5.28∗∗∗ | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Depression | Avoidance | 0.36 | 0.14 | 61.34∗∗∗ | 0.12 | 0.23 | 7.78∗∗∗ | 2.79∗ |
| Anxiety | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 9.94∗∗∗ | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Reappraisal | Avoidance | 0.31 | 0.09 | 26.25∗∗∗ | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.50 | 2.29∗ |
| Anxiety | 0.32 | 0.12 | 0.52 | 3.21∗∗ | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Sleep quality | Depression | 0.64 | 0.63 | 1.04 | 4.92∗∗∗ | |||
Note: n = 755. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Continuous variables in the regression equation have been normalized. LLCI and ULCI represent the lower and the upper limitations of 95% bootstrap confidence interval, respectively.
Multiple regression analyses of the moderate effect of cognitive reappraisal.
| Regression | Fit index | Significance of regression coefficient | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable | Independent variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Depression | Avoidance | 0.45 | 0.18 | 38.69∗∗∗ | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 2.64∗ |
| Anxiety | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.28 | 10.82∗∗∗ | ||||
|
| -0.04 | -0.01 | 0.08 | 1.62 | ||||
| Anxiety × | -0.08 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 3.81∗∗∗ | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Sleep quality | Avoidance | 0.31 | 0.10 | 16.14∗∗∗ | 0.28 | 0.05 | 0.52 | 2.35∗ |
| Anxiety | 0.31 | 0.11 | 0.51 | 3.08∗∗ | ||||
| Depression | 0.85 | 0.58 | 1.67 | 7.83∗∗∗ | ||||
|
| -0.07 | -0.13 | 0.26 | 0.67 | ||||
| Anxiety × | -0.11 | -0.06 | 0.29 | 1.26 | ||||
Note: n = 755. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Continuous variables in the regression equation have been normalized. LLCI and ULCI represent the lower and the upper limitations of 95% bootstrap confidence interval, respectively.
Figure 2Simple slope analyses of the moderating effect of cognitive reappraisal.
The indirect effects at different levels of cognitive reappraisal.
| Cognitive reappraisal | Indirect effect |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.31 | 0.25 | 0.36 |
|
| 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.27 |
|
| 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.21 |
Note: LLCI and ULCI represent the lower and the upper limitations of 95% bootstrap confidence interval, respectively.
Figure 3Effects of attachment anxiety on sleep quality moderated by cognitive reappraisal (LLCI and ULCI represent the lower and the upper limitations of 95% bootstrap confidence interval, respectively).