| Literature DB >> 32037598 |
A Koller1, F Fazzini1, C Lamina1, B Rantner2, B Kollerits1, M Stadler3,4, P Klein-Weigel5, G Fraedrich2, F Kronenberg1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dysfunctional mitochondria have an influence on inflammation and increased oxidative stress due to an excessive production of reactive oxygen species. The mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) is a potential biomarker for mitochondrial dysfunction and has been associated with various diseases. However, results were partially contrasting which might have been caused by methodological difficulties to quantify mtDNA-CN.Entities:
Keywords: cardiovascular disease; mitochondrial copy number; mortality; peripheral arterial disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32037598 PMCID: PMC7318579 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Intern Med ISSN: 0954-6820 Impact factor: 8.989
Baseline characteristics of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and control individuals matched by age and diabetes mellitus
| Controls ( | PAD Patients ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 56.9 ± 9.5 [50.0; 61.0; 64.0] | 58.3 ± 6.3 [54.0; 59.5; 63.0] | 0.96 |
| Body Mass Index (kg m−2) | 26.6 ± 3.9 | 26.7 ± 3.7 | 0.47 |
| Current smoker, | 30 (12.0%) | 122 (52.4%) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes Mellitus, | 41 (16.5%) | 35 (14.8%) | 0.62 |
| NT‐proBNP (pmol L−1) | 9.2 ± 12.1 [4.2; 6.1; 9.7] | 20.9 ± 35.1 [4.2; 10.9; 21.2] | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol (mg dL−1) | 207.7 ± 35.1 | 205.7 ± 40.8 | 0.51 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg dL−1) | 135.8 ± 33.1 | 133.4 ± 37.1 | 0.35 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg dL−1) | 59 ± 16 [48; 57; 69] | 49 ± 14 [41; 48; 54.25] | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides (mg dL−1) | 132 ± 80 [79; 111; 155] | 172 ± 125 [95; 135; 211] | <0.001 |
| C‐reactive protein (mg L−1) | 2.6 ± 3.4 [1.0; 1.4; 2.8] | 5.8 ± 6.4 [2.3; 4.2; 7.0] | <0.001 |
| Leukocytes (G L−1) | 5.8 ± 1.6 [4.5; 5.5; 6.7] | 7.5 ± 2.1 [6.2; 7.3; 8.8] | <0.001 |
| Platelets (G L−1) | 224 ± 51 [190; 222; 256] | 249 ± 60 [213; 243; 282] | <0.001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.9 ± 0.9 [5.5; 5.6; 5.9] | 6.0 ± 0.9 [5.5; 5.8; 6.1] | 0.002 |
| eGFR (mL min−1 1.73m−2) | 81.7 ± 12.7 | 84.9 ± 15.0 | <0.001 |
| Serum Albumin (g L−1) | 45.7 ± 3.9 [43.0; 45.6; 48.1] | 44.6 ± 4.6 [41.6; 44.2; 47.1] | <0.001 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 140 ± 17 | 150 ± 20 | <0.001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 82 ± 9 | 83 ± 10 | 0.33 |
| Hypertension, | 148 (59.7%) | 203 (86.0%) | <0.001 |
| Cardiovascular disease, | 19 (7.6%) | 67 (28.4%) | <0.001 |
| Ankle‐brachial index | 1.07 ± 0.12 [1.00; 1.08; 1.15] | 0.72 ± 0.23 [0.54; 0.70; 0.89] | <0.001 |
| Statin use, | 36 (14.6%) | 100 (43.1%) | <0.001 |
| mtDNA copy number | 113.6 ± 34.6 [90.4; 109.1; 132.2] | 115.9 ± 50.3 [77.1; 102.4; 152.9] | 0.29 |
Mean ± standard deviation (SD) [25th, 50th and 75th percentile in case of non‐normal distribution] or number (%).
GFR denotes glomerular filtration rate calculated according to the CKD EPI equation 47.
Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, and/or receiving antihypertension treatment.
The lowest ABI value from the 4 sites was used for data analysis. Individuals with ABI values >1.30 were excluded from this analysis.
Logistic regression analysis investigating the association between mtDNA copy number and peripheral arterial disease at baseline in 236 patients and 249 controls. Results are given for quartile 1 versus quartiles 2–4 combined (=reference)
| mtDNA‐CN Quartile 1 vs. Quartile 2–4 (=reference) | ||
|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Model 1 (adjusted for age) | 2.34 (1.53–3.06) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 (adjusted for age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, HDL cholesterol) | 2.45 (1.53–3.99) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 (adjusted for age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, HDL cholesterol and current smoking) | 1.53 (0.90–2.62) | 0.12 |
| Model 4 (adjusted for age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, HDL cholesterol, current smoking, leukocytes and platelets) | 1.05 (0.57–1.93) | 0.88 |
Quartile 2–4 were merged and set as a reference. The odds ratios (OR) shown are calculated for quartile 1.
Logistic regression analysis investigating the association between mtDNA copy number and prevalent CVD (n = 67 events) in PAD patients (n = 236). Results are given for quartile 1 versus quartiles 2–4 combined (=reference)
| mtDNA‐CN Quartile 1 vs. Quartile 2–4 (=reference) | ||
|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Model 1 (adjusted for age) | 1.44 (0.74–2.76) | 0.28 |
| Model 2 (adjusted for age, current smoking and HDL cholesterol) | 1.95 (0.95–4.02) | 0.07 |
| Model 3 (adjusted for age, current smoking, HDL cholesterol and hypertension) | 1.97 (0.95–4.10) | 0.06 |
| Model 4 (adjusted for age, current smoking, HDL cholesterol, hypertension, diabetes, leukocytes and platelets) | 2.34 (1.08–5.13) | 0.03 |
Quartile 2–4 were merged and set as a reference. ORs are calculated for quartile 1.
Figure 1Kaplan–Maier survival curve for all‐cause mortality by quartiles of mtDNA copy number (n = 37). The x‐axis shows observation time in years, y‐axis represents the survival for each quartile of patients with 1 being 100%
Figure 2Adjusted nonlinear spline with 95% confidence bands demonstrating the association between mtDNA‐CN and all‐cause mortality (adjusted for age and smoking). On the y‐axis, the Hazard ratio (HR) is given as log‐scale and on the x‐axis, mitochondrial DNA copy number is shown. The median value of mtDNA copy number (102.36) is set as a reference with HR = 1 (horizontal dashed line). The vertical dashed lines show the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile of mtDNA‐CN. The rug plot at the bottom of the figures displays each single measured mtDNA‐CN value
Cox regression analysis investigating the association of mtDNA copy number and all‐cause mortality, major cardiovascular events and the extended definition of cardiovascular events during a median follow‐up of 7 years
| mtDNA‐CN Quartile 1 vs. Quartile 2–4 (=reference) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All‐cause mortality (37 events) | Major cardiovascular events (35 events) | Extended definition of cardiovascular events (66 events) | ||||
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Model 1 | 3.27 (1.64–6.50) | <0.001 | 2.34 (1.14–4.79) | 0.02 | 1.95 (1.14–3.33) | 0.02 |
| Model 2 | 2.79 (1.37–5.67) | 0.005 | 2.10 (0.99–4.44) | 0.05 | 1.81 (1.04–3.17) | 0.04 |
| Model 3 | 2.62 (1.27–5.40) | 0.008 | 2.09 (0.98–4.46) | 0.06 | 1.77 (1.01–3.92) | 0.04 |
| Model 4 | 2.66 (1.27–5.58) | 0.0098 | 2.04 (0.92–4.50) | 0.08 | 1.82 (1.02–3.27) | 0.04 |
Model 1: adjusted for age; Model 2: adjusted for age, current smoking, ln‐CRP, diabetes mellitus; Model 3: adjusted for age, current smoking, ln‐CRP, diabetes mellitus, prevalent CVD; Model 4: adjusted for age, current smoking, ln‐CRP, diabetes mellitus, prevalent CVD, leukocytes and platelets.
Quartile 2–4 were merged and set as reference. The odds ratios (OR) displayed are calculated for quartile 1.