Literature DB >> 32037211

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Short Forms Demonstrate Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroplasty.

Lafi S Khalil1, Brian Darrith1, Sreten Franovic1, Jason J Davis1, Robb M Weir1, Trevor R Banka1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is an alternative to legacy outcome metrics. We investigated the relationship between Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and PROMIS Global Health forms of Physical Health (PH) and Mental Health (MH) in knee arthroplasty patients.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of knee arthroplasty patients from December 2017 through April 2019 who had surveys collected preoperatively and postoperatively. We excluded patients undergoing revision surgery. Outcome scores were analyzed for responsiveness, effect size index (ESI), minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and correlation with each other through 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: A total of 875 patients were included. Floor and ceiling effects were 0% for PROMIS-PH. Postoperative PROMIS-PH and KOOS-JR scores significantly correlated with one another and increased from baseline at each postoperative time point (P < .001 for all). PROMIS-MH did not change between time points (P > .05). PROMIS-PH showed moderate responsiveness at 1 and 3 months (ESI >0.2) and excellent responsiveness at 6 and 12 months (ESI >0.8), whereas KOOS-JR was responsive at all time points (ESI >0.8). The MCID of PROMIS-PH correlated significantly with KOOS-JR, and a preoperative PROMIS-PH score of less than 32.5 predicted achieving MCID with 97% specificity.
CONCLUSION: PROMIS global health forms are a valid metric which capture patient outcomes and correlate with KOOS-JR scores after knee arthroplasty. Although KOOS-JR may be more responsive in the early postoperative time period, both measures show excellent responsiveness at 6 and 12 months after knee arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KOOS; PROMIS; TKA; arthroplasty; patient-reported outcomes; responsiveness

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32037211     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Incidental findings detected on preoperative CT imaging obtained for robotic-assisted joint replacements: clinical importance and the effect on the scheduled arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gary Tran; Lafi S Khalil; Allen Wrubel; Chad L Klochko; Jason J Davis; Steven B Soliman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Ultrasound evaluations and guided procedures of the painful joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Steven B Soliman; Jason J Davis; Stephanie J Muh; Saifuddin T Vohra; Ashish Patel; Marnix T van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.128

Review 3.  Maximum subjective outcome improvement is reported by 3 Months following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua P Castle; Lafi S Khalil; Muhammad J Abbas; Stephanie DeBolle; Marissa Tandron; Austin G Cross; Guillermo A Rodriguez; Kelechi R Okoroha
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-14

4.  Dutch reference values for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scale v1.2 - Global Health (PROMIS-GH).

Authors:  Ellen B M Elsman; Leo D Roorda; Martine H P Crins; Maarten Boers; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-05-12

5.  Patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yiou Wang; Meihua Yin; Shibai Zhu; Xi Chen; Hongru Zhou; Wenwei Qian
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 5.853

6.  Resilience and pain catastrophizing among patients with total knee arthroplasty: a cohort study to examine psychological constructs as predictors of post-operative outcomes.

Authors:  Vesta C Nwankwo; William A Jiranek; Cynthia L Green; Kelli D Allen; Steven Z George; Janet Prvu Bettger
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.077

7.  Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test Is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Authors:  Blake M Bodendorfer; Ian M Clapp; Robert B Browning; Thomas D Alter; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-27

8.  A Psycholgical Intervention Delivered by Automated Mobile Phone Messaging Stabilized Hip and Knee Function During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Chris A Anthony; Edward Rojas; Natalie Glass; Valerie Keffala; Nicholas Noiseux; Jacob Elkins; Timothy S Brown; Nicholas A Bedard
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 9.  Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; John Devin Peipert; Robert Chapman; Jin-Shei Lai; Berend Terluin; David Cella; Philip Griffith; Lidwine B Mokkink
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.