K Lorraine Stone1, W Andrew Smedley2, John Killian3, Shannon W Stephens4, Russell L Griffin5, Daniel B Cox6, Jeffrey D Kerby7, Jan O Jansen8. 1. School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: klstone@uab.edu. 2. School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: asmedley@uab.edu. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: jtkillian@uabmc.edu. 4. Center for Injury Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: swstephens@uabmc.edu. 5. Center for Injury Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: rlgriffin@uabmc.edu. 6. Center for Injury Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: danielcox@uabmc.edu. 7. Center for Injury Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: jkerby@uabmc.edu. 8. Center for Injury Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: jjansen@uabmc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the impact of different flight path models on the calculated population coverage of aeromedical retrieval systems, using the state of Alabama as a case study. METHODS: Geospatial analysis of U.S. Census Bureau population data using helicopter bases and trauma centers as foci of either circular or elliptical coverage areas. RESULTS: Circular isochrone models around helicopter bases or trauma centers suggest that the entire population of Alabama could reach a level I or II trauma center within 60 min. Elliptical isochrones, incorporating outbound and inbound flights, suggest that only 78.8% of the population have ready access to level I or II trauma centers. CONCLUSION: While all three flight path models described have some validity and utility, simplistic circular flight time isochrones around trauma centers and helicopter bases provide overly optimistic estimates of population coverage. The elliptical model provides a more realistic evaluation.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the impact of different flight path models on the calculated population coverage of aeromedical retrieval systems, using the state of Alabama as a case study. METHODS: Geospatial analysis of U.S. Census Bureau population data using helicopter bases and trauma centers as foci of either circular or elliptical coverage areas. RESULTS: Circular isochrone models around helicopter bases or trauma centers suggest that the entire population of Alabama could reach a level I or II trauma center within 60 min. Elliptical isochrones, incorporating outbound and inbound flights, suggest that only 78.8% of the population have ready access to level I or II trauma centers. CONCLUSION: While all three flight path models described have some validity and utility, simplistic circular flight time isochrones around trauma centers and helicopter bases provide overly optimistic estimates of population coverage. The elliptical model provides a more realistic evaluation.
Authors: Ellen J MacKenzie; Frederick P Rivara; Gregory J Jurkovich; Avery B Nathens; Katherine P Frey; Brian L Egleston; David S Salkever; Daniel O Scharfstein Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-01-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Brendan G Carr; Ariel J Bowman; Catherine S Wolff; Michael T Mullen; Daniel N Holena; Charles C Branas; Douglas J Wiebe Journal: Injury Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Caleb W Jones; Rachel D Rodriguez; Russell L Griffin; Gerald McGwin; Jan O Jansen; Jeffrey D Kerby; Patrick L Bosarge Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Scott M Sasser; Richard C Hunt; Mark Faul; David Sugerman; William S Pearson; Theresa Dulski; Marlena M Wald; Gregory J Jurkovich; Craig D Newgard; E Brooke Lerner Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2012-01-13
Authors: Naomi Dodds; Philip Emerson; Stephanie Phillips; David R Green; Jan O Jansen Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Weston Andrew Smedley; John Killian; Kelly Lorraine Stone; Shannon W Stephens; Russell L Griffin; Daniel B Cox; Jeffrey D Kerby; Jan O Jansen Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2020-10-14 Impact factor: 2.192