Literature DB >> 3203690

Differences in the binding of H1 variants to DNA. Cooperativity and linker-length related distribution.

D J Clark1, J O Thomas.   

Abstract

A study of the complexes formed between short linear DNA and three H1 variants, a typical somatic H1, and the extreme variants H5, from chicken erythrocytes, and spH1 from sea urchin sperm, has revealed differences between H1, H5 and spH1 that have implications for chromatin structure and folding. 1. All three histones bind cooperatively to DNA in 35 mM NaCl forming similar, but not identical, rod-like complexes. With sufficiently long DNA the complexes may be circular, circles forming more easily with H5 and spH1 than with H1. 2. The binding of H5 and spH1 to DNA is cooperative even in 5 mM NaCl, resulting in well-defined thin filaments that appear to contain two DNA molecules bridged by histone molecules. In contrast, H1 binds distributively over all the DNA molecules in 5 mM NaCl, but forms short stretches similar in appearance to the thin filaments formed with H5 and spH1. Rods appear to arise from the intertwining of regular thin filaments containing cooperatively bound histone molecules on raising the NaCl concentration to 35 mM. 3. The compositions of the rods correspond to one histone molecule for about every 47 bp (H1), 81 bp (H5) and 112 bp (spH1), suggesting average spacings of 24 bp (H1), 41 bp (H5) and 56 bp (spH1) in the component thin (double) filaments. Strikingly, these values are proportional to the linker lengths of the chromatins in which the particular H1 variant is the main or sole H1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3203690     DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb14447.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Biochem        ISSN: 0014-2956


  26 in total

1.  H-NS mediated compaction of DNA visualised by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  R T Dame; C Wyman; N Goosen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Nucleosomal structure and histone H1 subfractional composition of pea (Pisum sativum) root nodules, radicles and callus chromatin.

Authors:  E P Bers; N P Singh; V A Pardonen; L A Lutova; A O Zalensky
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Direct detection of linker DNA bending in defined-length oligomers of chromatin.

Authors:  J Yao; P T Lowary; J Widom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cooperative binding of the globular domains of histones H1 and H5 to DNA.

Authors:  J O Thomas; C Rees; J T Finch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Co-operative interactions of oligonucleosomal DNA with the H1e histone variant and its poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated isoform.

Authors:  M D'erme; G Zardo; A Reale; P Caiafa
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Nucleosome linker DNA contacts and induces specific folding of the intrinsically disordered H1 carboxyl-terminal domain.

Authors:  Tamara L Caterino; He Fang; Jeffrey J Hayes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Identification of two DNA-binding sites on the globular domain of histone H5.

Authors:  F A Goytisolo; S E Gerchman; X Yu; C Rees; V Graziano; V Ramakrishnan; J O Thomas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  The methylated DNA binding protein-2-H1 (MDBP-2-H1) consists of histone H1 subtypes which are truncated at the C-terminus.

Authors:  S Schwarz; D Hess; J P Jost
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Histone H1 preferentially binds to superhelical DNA molecules of higher compaction.

Authors:  M Ivanchenko; J Zlatanova; K van Holde
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  A nucleosome-free region locally abrogates histone H1-dependent restriction of linker DNA accessibility in chromatin.

Authors:  Laxmi Narayan Mishra; Jeffrey J Hayes
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.