Literature DB >> 32036461

Analysis of the impact of EEA stapler size on risk of anastomotic complications in colorectal anastomosis: does size matter?

T Reif de Paula1, H Simon1, M Shah2, S Lee-Kong1, J M Kiely1, R P Kiran1, D S Keller3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal anastomotic complications are dreaded and dramatically affect outcomes. Causes are multifactorial, with the size of the end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler a modifiable factor and potential target for risk reduction. Our goal was to examine the impact of the EEA stapler size on the risk of anastomotic complications in left-sided colorectal resections.
METHODS: A prospective divisional database was reviewed for consecutive elective left-sided resections with a colorectal anastomosis using an EEA stapler from January 2013 May 2018 inclusive. Patients were stratified into 25-29 mm or 30-33 mm cohorts. Patient and disease demographics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. The main outcome measures were the rate and factors associated with anastomotic complications.
RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-three cases were evaluated, 185 ( 39.1%) were in the 25-29 mm group and 288 (60.9%) in the 30-33 mm group. Patients were comparable in demographics and operative variables. More males were anastomosed with the 30-33 mm than with the 25-29 mm stapler (57.6% vs 28.6%, p < 0.01). Significantly more patients developed an anastomotic stricture with the 25-29 mm than with the 30-33 mm staplers (7.1% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in leak rates or reoperation/interventions between groups. On logistic regression, neither gender, operative indication nor approach were associated with anastomotic leak, readmission, or reoperation/intervention. Stapler size remained significantly associated with stricture (p = 0.032).
CONCLUSIONS: The 25-29 mm EEA staplers were associated with an increased rate of anastomotic stricture compared to 30-33 mm staplers in left-sided colorectal anastomoses. As stapler size is a simple process measure that is easily modifyable, this is a potential target for improving anastomotic complication rates. Further controlled trials may help assess the impact of stapler size on improving patient and quality outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomosis; Anastomotic leak; Colorectal neoplasms; Constriction; Elective surgical procedures; Outcome assessment; Surgical stapler; health care; pathologic; surgical

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32036461     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02155-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  22 in total

1.  Influence of stapler size used at ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on anastomotic leak, stricture, long-term functional outcomes, and quality of life.

Authors:  Hasan T Kirat; Ravi P Kiran; Lei Lian; Feza H Remzi; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; H Leon Pachter
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Oncologic outcome and recurrence rate following anastomotic leakage after curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Winesh Ramphal; Jeske R E Boeding; Paul D Gobardhan; Harm J T Rutten; Leandra J M Boonman de Winter; Rogier M P H Crolla; Jennifer M J Schreinemakers
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.279

5.  A collaborative review of the current concepts and challenges of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  A Vallance; S Wexner; M Berho; R Cahill; M Coleman; N Haboubi; R J Heald; R H Kennedy; B Moran; N Mortensen; R W Motson; R Novell; P R O'Connell; F Ris; T Rockall; A Senapati; A Windsor; D G Jayne
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 6.  Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.

Authors:  S A Lustosa; D Matos; A N Atallah; A A Castro
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

7.  Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures.

Authors:  R D Schlegel; N Dehni; R Parc; S Caplin; E Tiret
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Combined preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics significantly reduces surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and ileus after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Ravi Pokala Kiran; Alice C A Murray; Cody Chiuzan; David Estrada; Kenneth Forde
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group.

Authors:  J G Docherty; J R McGregor; A M Akyol; G D Murray; D J Galloway
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Surgical stapling device-tissue interactions: what surgeons need to know to improve patient outcomes.

Authors:  Edward Chekan; Richard L Whelan
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-09-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical efficacy of endoscopic dilation combined with bleomycin injection for benign anastomotic stricture after rectal surgery.

Authors:  Xin Miao; Li Liu; Xiang Wang; Zhining Fan; Lin Miao; Jiankun Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.