Literature DB >> 32036444

Memory effects of conflict and cognitive control are processing stage-specific: evidence from pupillometry.

Melissa J Ptok1, Kara E Hannah2, Scott Watter3.   

Abstract

An increasing number of studies in the conflict/control and perceptual desirable difficulty literatures show memory benefits for information in high-conflict task situations. Recent work suggests that increased conflict does not produce a task-wide encoding benefit; rather, conflict must focus high-level attention on to-be-tested information to produce an encoding benefit. We used pupil dilation measures to directly assess this stage-specific model of conflict-encoding effects. We show clear performance costs of incongruency (slower RT and larger pupil dilation) with both semantic and response distractors, but show memory benefits only with semantic conflict. Further, when participants were encouraged to focus more (eliciting greater endogenous effort and control for all trials, not just incongruent trials), we observe larger and more similar pupil responses and reduced memory differences between high versus low semantic conflict conditions. These data confirm and extend a stage-specific model of conflict-encoding effects, with converging behavioural and physiological data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32036444     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01295-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  18 in total

1.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.

Authors:  M M Botvinick; T S Braver; D M Barch; C S Carter; J D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Inhibition-induced forgetting: when more control leads to less memory.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-11-14

3.  Fortune favors the bold (and the Italicized): effects of disfluency on educational outcomes.

Authors:  Connor Diemand-Yauman; Daniel M Oppenheimer; Erikka B Vaughan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-10-30

4.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain.

Authors:  Tobias Egner; Margaret Delano; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The embodiment of focus: investigating the impact of leaning behavior on our cognitive state and other's perception of our cognitive state.

Authors:  Joseph D Chisholm; Evan F Risko; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain.

Authors:  Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Creatures of habit (and control): a multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects.

Authors:  Tobias Egner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-06

Review 9.  What determines the specificity of conflict adaptation? A review, critical analysis, and proposed synthesis.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Elger L Abrahamse; Wout Duthoo; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-08

10.  Pupil size reflects successful encoding and recall of memory in humans.

Authors:  Michal T Kucewicz; Jaromir Dolezal; Vaclav Kremen; Brent M Berry; Laura R Miller; Abigail L Magee; Vratislav Fabian; Gregory A Worrell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating the learning of stimulus-control associations through incidental memory of reinforcement events.

Authors:  Christina Bejjani; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.140

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.