Literature DB >> 32036400

Navigating Institutional Challenges: Design to Enable Community Participation in Social Learning for Freshwater Planning.

James A Turner1, Will Allen2, Caroline Fraser3,4, Andrew Fenemor5, Akiko Horita6, Toni White6, Lan Chen6, Maggie Atkinson5, Michelle Rush7.   

Abstract

Social learning is a process suited to developing understanding and concerted action to tackle complex resource dilemmas, such as freshwater management. Research has begun to recognise that in practice social learning encounters a variety of institutional challenges from the shared habits and routines of stakeholders (organised by rules, norms and strategies) that are embedded in organisational structures and norms of professional behaviour. These institutional habits and routines influence the degree of willingness to engage with stakeholders, and expectations of behaviours in social learning processes. Considering this, there has been a call to understand how institutions influence social learning and emergent outcomes. We addresses this by presenting a heuristic for implementing social learning cognisant of institutional context to answer three questions: (i) How institutional influences impact implementation of social learning design; (ii) how implementation of social learning design modifies institutions influencing social learning; and (iii) how these changes in design and institutions together shape social learning outcomes? To answer these questions a freshwater planning exercise was designed, implemented and evaluated as a social learning process with community groups in two New Zealand catchments. Incorporating participatory reflection enabled the project team to modify social learning design to manage institutional influences hindering progress toward outcomes. Findings emphasise that social learning is underpinned by participants' changing assumptions about what constitutes the institution of learning itself-from instruction to a dynamic, collective and emergent process. Reflecting on these assumptions also challenged participants' expectations about their own and others' behaviours and roles in freshwater planning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catchment; Collaboration; Freshwater planning; Institutions; Participation; Social learning

Year:  2020        PMID: 32036400     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01256-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  5 in total

1.  The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein.

Authors:  Jonathan Quetzal Tritter; Alison McCallum
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Bridging disciplines, knowledge systems and cultures in pest management.

Authors:  Will Allen; Shaun Ogilvie; Helen Blackie; Des Smith; Shona Sam; James Doherty; Don McKenzie; James Ataria; Lee Shapiro; Jamie MacKay; Elaine Murphy; Chris Jacobson; Charles Eason
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Determinants of the process and outcomes of household participation in collaborative forest management in Ghana: a quantitative test of a community resilience model.

Authors:  Kofi Akamani; Troy Elizabeth Hall
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Adaptive management: from more talk to real action.

Authors:  Byron K Williams; Eleanor D Brown
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 5.  Achieving Research Impact Through Co-creation in Community-Based Health Services: Literature Review and Case Study.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Claire Jackson; Sara Shaw; Tina Janamian
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.911

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.