Literature DB >> 32036092

Use of Spiked Normalizers to More Precisely Quantify Tumor Markers and Viral Genomes by Massive Parallel Sequencing of Plasma DNA.

Margaret L Gulley1, Sandra Elmore2, Gaorav P Gupta3, Sunil Kumar3, Matthew Egleston4, Ian J Hoskins4, Aaron Garnett4.   

Abstract

A problematic aspect of massive parallel sequencing is that somatic mutations and viral loads are typically quantified as a fraction relative to wild-type human DNA, yet wild-type levels vary with diverse biologic and preanalytic interferences. A novel strategy was devised to quantify target analytes in copies per mL of plasma after normalizing for read counts of spiked DNAs. Five synthetic DNAs (called EndoGenus spikes) were added to plasma before library preparation (modified ArcherDX LiquidPlex 28). By normalizing to the fractional recovery of EndoGenus spike reads, numerical values for each disease marker were reportable in units of copies per mL. To show how well this system operates, replicate assays were performed on 40 mock plasmas having 23 engineered mutations and on 21 natural plasmas. Reads for all five EndoGenus spikes were recovered (means, 313 and 376 copies/mL in mock and natural plasmas, respectively). Normalizing read counts for the proportional recovery of spikes helped control for variables in the multistep protocol, reducing the CV in replicate tests from 34% to 22% for mutations and from 25% to 7% for viral loads. In conclusion, the EndoGenus system is useful for evaluating efficiency of the total test system and for precisely quantifying target molecules. This system may benefit patients being monitored for disease burden while also tracking emerging subclones.
Copyright © 2020 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32036092      PMCID: PMC7196851          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  9 in total

Review 1.  Reference standards for next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Simon A Hardwick; Ira W Deveson; Tim R Mercer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Hybridization of G-quadruplex-forming peptide nucleic acids to guanine-rich DNA templates inhibits DNA polymerase η extension.

Authors:  Connor T Murphy; Anisha Gupta; Bruce A Armitage; Patricia L Opresko
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Clinical Validation of a Cell-Free DNA Gene Panel.

Authors:  Ju Cheng; Yi Cao; Allison MacLeay; Jochen K Lennerz; Aymen Baig; Ryan P Frazier; Jesse Lee; Krista Hu; Maciej Pacula; Enrique Meneses; Hayley Robinson; Julie M Batten; Priscilla K Brastianos; Rebecca S Heist; Aditya Bardia; Long P Le; A John Iafrate
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Probing the Potential Role of Non-B DNA Structures at Yeast Meiosis-Specific DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  Rucha Kshirsagar; Krishnendu Khan; Mamata V Joshi; Ramakrishna V Hosur; K Muniyappa
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  External RNA Controls Consortium Beta Version Update.

Authors:  Hangnoh Lee; P Scott Pine; Jennifer McDaniel; Marc Salit; Brian Oliver
Journal:  J Genomics       Date:  2016-07-26

6.  Enrichment of short mutant cell-free DNA fragments enhanced detection of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Liu; Lingxiao Liu; Yuan Ji; Changyu Li; Tao Wei; Xuerong Yang; Yuefang Zhang; Xuyu Cai; Yangbin Gao; Weihong Xu; Shengxiang Rao; Dayong Jin; Wenhui Lou; Zilong Qiu; Xiaolin Wang
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 8.143

7.  Day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free DNA.

Authors:  Anne Tranberg Madsen; Johanne Andersen Hojbjerg; Boe Sandahl Sorensen; Anne Winther-Larsen
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 8.143

8.  Synthetic spike-in standards improve run-specific systematic error analysis for DNA and RNA sequencing.

Authors:  Justin M Zook; Daniel Samarov; Jennifer McDaniel; Shurjo K Sen; Marc Salit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Multilaboratory Assessment of a New Reference Material for Quality Assurance of Cell-Free Tumor DNA Measurements.

Authors:  Hua-Jun He; Erica V Stein; Yves Konigshofer; Thomas Forbes; Farol L Tomson; Russell Garlick; Emiko Yamada; Tony Godfrey; Toshiya Abe; Koji Tamura; Michael Borges; Michael Goggins; Sandra Elmore; Margaret L Gulley; Jessica L Larson; Lando Ringel; Brian C Haynes; Chris Karlovich; P Mickey Williams; Aaron Garnett; Anders Ståhlberg; Stefan Filges; Lynn Sorbara; Mathew R Young; Sudhir Srivastava; Kenneth D Cole
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 5.568

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.