Literature DB >> 32034999

Efficacy Analysis of Separation Surgery Combined with SBRT for Spinal Metastases-A Long-Term Follow-Up Study Based on Patients with Spinal Metastatic Tumor in a Single-Center.

Liu Xiaozhou1, Zhou Xing1, Shi Xin1, Li Chengjun1, Zhang Lei1, Zhou Guangxin1, Wu Sujia1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Follow-up data of patients with spinal metastatic tumors were analyzed to investigate the effect of separation surgery combined with SBRT on clinical outcomes.
METHODS: The clinical data of 52 patients with spinal metastatic tumors admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 24 males and 28 females, aged 25-77 years, with an average of 56.7 ± 7.4 years. The separation surgery of all patients was successfully completed and followed up. Frankel neurological function grading, Karnofsky performance scores, VAS scores, Epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) grading and muscle strength grading were used to assess the patients' condition. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Log⁃rank test were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and the 95% feasible interval for patients with different ages, genders, and treatments. The multivariate Cox regression model was used to calculate the risk value HR and the 95% feasible interval in patients undergoing only separation surgery or separation surgery combined with SBRT.
RESULTS: After separation surgery, 46 patients had pain relief (88.5%), and the average VAS score decreased to 2.17 ± 0.52 points, which was significantly improved compared with preoperative score (P < 0.01). Muscle strength grading decreased in seven cases, showed no change in two cases, and recovered in 19 cases. Postoperative Frankel neurological function grading and Karnofsky performance scores were also significantly improved compared with preoperative scores (P < 0.01). The patients who accepted separation surgery were followed up for 9-47 months (26.3 ± 18.1 months), and 15 patients died due to the deterioration of the primary tumor. Thirteen patients received SBRT after surgery, including 12 cases of pain relief. The average VAS score of these 13 patients decreased to 1.64±0.41 points, which was significantly improved compared with preoperative and postoperative (P < 0.01), and muscle strength recovered in eight cases. Frankel neurological function grading and Karnofsky performance scores of these patients were also significantly improved compared with preoperative and postoperative Frankel neurological function grading and Karnofsky performance scores (P < 0.01). The patients who accepted separation surgery combined with SBRT were followed up for 11-38 months (mean 22.5 ± 10.2 months), and five cases died of primary tumor. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that separation surgery combined with SBRT was an independent predictor of overall survival rate (OS).
CONCLUSIONS: Separation surgery combined with SBRT is an effective way to treat spinal metastatic tumors as it not only has smaller surgical trauma, but can also significantly relieve pain, improve nerve function, and relieve spinal cord compression.
© 2020 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Efficacy analysis; Long-term follow-up study; SBRT; Separation surgery; Spinal metastatic tumor

Year:  2020        PMID: 32034999     DOI: 10.1111/os.12594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1757-7853            Impact factor:   2.071


  5 in total

1.  Separation Surgery in the Treatment of Spinal Metastasis.

Authors:  Rui-Feng Li; Rui-Qi Qiao; Ming-You Xu; Rong-Xing Ma; Yong-Cheng Hu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

Review 2.  A systematic review of MIS and open decompression surgery for spinal metastases in the last two decades.

Authors:  Bhoresh Dhamija; Dheeraj Batheja; Birender Singh Balain
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-09-25

Review 3.  Separation surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: A qualitative review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Di Perna; Fabio Cofano; Cristina Mantovani; Serena Badellino; Nicola Marengo; Marco Ajello; Ludovico Maria Comite; Giuseppe Palmieri; Fulvio Tartara; Francesco Zenga; Umberto Ricardi; Diego Garbossa
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 4.072

4.  Predictive factors, preventive implications, and personalized surgical strategies for bone metastasis from lung cancer: population-based approach with a comprehensive cancer center-based study.

Authors:  Xianglin Hu; Wending Huang; Zhengwang Sun; Hui Ye; Kwong Man; Qifeng Wang; Yangbai Sun; Wangjun Yan
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 5.  An Overview of Decision Making in the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors.

Authors:  Gautam R Zaveri; Reetu Jain; Nishank Mehta; Bhavuk Garg
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 1.251

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.