| Literature DB >> 32034960 |
Ioana Agache1, Jessica Beltran2, Cezmi Akdis3,4, Mubeccel Akdis3, Carlos Canelo-Aybar2,5, Giorgio Walter Canonica6, Thomas Casale7, Tomas Chivato8, Jonathan Corren9, Stefano Del Giacco10, Thomas Eiwegger11,12,13, Davide Firinu10, James E Gern14, Eckard Hamelmann15, Nicola Hanania16, Mika Mäkelä17, Irene Hernández-Martín18, Parameswaran Nair19,20, Liam O'Mahony21, Nikolaos G Papadopoulos22,23, Alberto Papi24, Hae-Sim Park25, Luis Pérez de Llano26, Margarita Posso2,27, Claudio Rocha2, Santiago Quirce28, Joaquin Sastre29, Mohamed Shamji30,31, Yang Song2, Corinna Steiner2, Jurgen Schwarze32, Pablo Alonso-Coello2,5, Oscar Palomares33, Marek Jutel34,35.
Abstract
Five biologicals have been approved for severe eosinophilic asthma, a well-recognized phenotype. Systematic reviews (SR) evaluated the efficacy and safety of benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab (alphabetical order) compared to standard of care for severe eosinophilic asthma. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to identify RCTs and health economic evaluations, published in English. Critical and important asthma-related outcomes were evaluated for each of the biologicals. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. 19 RCTs (three RCTs for benralizumab, three RCTs for dupilumab, three RCTs for mepolizumab, five RCTs for omalizumab and five RCTs for reslizumab), including subjects 12 to 75 years old (except for omalizumab including also subjects 6-11 years old), ranging from 12 to 56 weeks were evaluated. All biologicals reduce exacerbation rates with high certainty of evidence: benralizumab incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.53 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.72), dupilumab (IRR) 0.43 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.59), mepolizumab IRR 0.49 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.66), omalizumab (IRR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.77) and reslizumab (IRR) 0.46 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.58). Benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab reduce the daily dose of oral corticosteroids (OCS) with high certainty of evidence. All evaluated biologicals probably improve asthma control, QoL and FEV1 , without reaching the minimal important difference (moderate certainty). Benralizumab, mepolizumab and reslizumab slightly increase drug-related adverse events (AE) and drug-related serious AE (low to very low certainty of evidence). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year value is above the willingness to pay threshold for all biologicals (moderate certainty). Potential savings are driven by decrease in hospitalizations, emergency and primary care visits. There is high certainty that all approved biologicals reduce the rate of severe asthma exacerbations and for benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab for reducing OCS. There is moderate certainty for improving asthma control, QoL, FEV1 . More data on long-term safety are needed together with more efficacy data in the paediatric population.Entities:
Keywords: biologicals; cost-effectiveness; efficacy; safety; severe-eosinophilic-asthma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32034960 DOI: 10.1111/all.14221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Allergy ISSN: 0105-4538 Impact factor: 13.146