Literature DB >> 32034960

Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab) for severe eosinophilic asthma. A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines - recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma.

Ioana Agache1, Jessica Beltran2, Cezmi Akdis3,4, Mubeccel Akdis3, Carlos Canelo-Aybar2,5, Giorgio Walter Canonica6, Thomas Casale7, Tomas Chivato8, Jonathan Corren9, Stefano Del Giacco10, Thomas Eiwegger11,12,13, Davide Firinu10, James E Gern14, Eckard Hamelmann15, Nicola Hanania16, Mika Mäkelä17, Irene Hernández-Martín18, Parameswaran Nair19,20, Liam O'Mahony21, Nikolaos G Papadopoulos22,23, Alberto Papi24, Hae-Sim Park25, Luis Pérez de Llano26, Margarita Posso2,27, Claudio Rocha2, Santiago Quirce28, Joaquin Sastre29, Mohamed Shamji30,31, Yang Song2, Corinna Steiner2, Jurgen Schwarze32, Pablo Alonso-Coello2,5, Oscar Palomares33, Marek Jutel34,35.   

Abstract

Five biologicals have been approved for severe eosinophilic asthma, a well-recognized phenotype. Systematic reviews (SR) evaluated the efficacy and safety of benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab (alphabetical order) compared to standard of care for severe eosinophilic asthma. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to identify RCTs and health economic evaluations, published in English. Critical and important asthma-related outcomes were evaluated for each of the biologicals. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. 19 RCTs (three RCTs for benralizumab, three RCTs for dupilumab, three RCTs for mepolizumab, five RCTs for omalizumab and five RCTs for reslizumab), including subjects 12 to 75 years old (except for omalizumab including also subjects 6-11 years old), ranging from 12 to 56 weeks were evaluated. All biologicals reduce exacerbation rates with high certainty of evidence: benralizumab incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.53 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.72), dupilumab (IRR) 0.43 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.59), mepolizumab IRR 0.49 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.66), omalizumab (IRR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.77) and reslizumab (IRR) 0.46 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.58). Benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab reduce the daily dose of oral corticosteroids (OCS) with high certainty of evidence. All evaluated biologicals probably improve asthma control, QoL and FEV1 , without reaching the minimal important difference (moderate certainty). Benralizumab, mepolizumab and reslizumab slightly increase drug-related adverse events (AE) and drug-related serious AE (low to very low certainty of evidence). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year value is above the willingness to pay threshold for all biologicals (moderate certainty). Potential savings are driven by decrease in hospitalizations, emergency and primary care visits. There is high certainty that all approved biologicals reduce the rate of severe asthma exacerbations and for benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab for reducing OCS. There is moderate certainty for improving asthma control, QoL, FEV1 . More data on long-term safety are needed together with more efficacy data in the paediatric population.
© 2020 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biologicals; cost-effectiveness; efficacy; safety; severe-eosinophilic-asthma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32034960     DOI: 10.1111/all.14221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  48 in total

1.  Sex Hormones and Lung Inflammation.

Authors:  Jorge Reyes-García; Luis M Montaño; Abril Carbajal-García; Yong-Xiao Wang
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  Different Phenotypes in Asthma: Clinical Findings and Experimental Animal Models.

Authors:  Luiz Otávio Lourenço; Alessandra Mussi Ribeiro; Fernanda Degobbi Tenório Quirino Dos Santos Lopes; Iolanda de Fátima Lopes Calvo Tibério; Wothan Tavares-de-Lima; Carla Máximo Prado
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 3.  Anti-IL-5 therapies for asthma.

Authors:  Hugo A Farne; Amanda Wilson; Stephen Milan; Emma Banchoff; Freda Yang; Colin Ve Powell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 4.  Biologics to Treat Severe Asthma in Children and Adolescents: A Practical Update.

Authors:  Gian Luigi Marseglia; Amelia Licari; Maria Angela Tosca; Giorgio Ciprandi
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 0.885

5.  Economic burden of severe asthma treatment: A real-life study.

Authors:  Jesús López-Tiro; Angelica Contreras-Contreras; M Eunice Rodríguez-Arellano; Paula Costa-Urrutia
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 5.516

Review 6. 

Authors:  Adrian Gillissen
Journal:  Pneumo News       Date:  2022-05-03

Review 7.  Anti-interleukin-13 and anti-interleukin-4 agents versus placebo, anti-interleukin-5 or anti-immunoglobulin-E agents, for people with asthma.

Authors:  Andrew Gallagher; Michaela Edwards; Parameswaran Nair; Stewart Drew; Aashish Vyas; Rashmi Sharma; Paul A Marsden; Ran Wang; David Jw Evans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-19

Review 8.  Type 2 immunity-driven diseases: Towards a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Dorian Hassoun; Olivier Malard; Sébastien Barbarot; Antoine Magnan; Luc Colas
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 5.401

9. 

Authors:  L Klimek; S Becker; R Buhl; A M Chaker; T Huppertz; T K Hoffmann; S Dazert; T Deitmer; U Förster-Ruhrmann; H Olze; J Hagemann; S K Plontke; H Wrede; W Schlenter; H J Welkoborsky; B Wollenberg; A G Beule; C Rudack; S Strieth; R Mösges; C Bachert; T Stöver; C Matthias; A Dietz
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 1.057

Review 10.  Allergic Aspects of IgG4-Related Disease: Implications for Pathogenesis and Therapy.

Authors:  Despina Michailidou; Daniella Muallem Schwartz; Tomas Mustelin; Grant C Hughes
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.