Literature DB >> 32032724

Oncologic Safety and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Julie A Margenthaler1, Connie Gan2, Yan Yan2, Amy E Cyr2, Marissa Tenenbaum2, Diana Hook2, Terence M Myckatyn2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is an alternative to skin-sparing mastectomy in appropriately selected patients. The aim of this study was to review our experience with NSM and to evaluate for oncologic safety. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients who underwent NSM at our institution from September 2008 through August 2017 were identified after IRB approval. Data included patient age, tobacco use, tumor size, hormone receptor status, lymph node status, radiation and chemotherapy use, incision type, and reconstruction type. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and chi-square tests.
RESULTS: There were 322 patients who underwent 588 NSM (83% bilateral, 17% unilateral), including 399 (68%) for malignancy (Stage 0 [27%], I [44%], II [25%] and III [4%]). The overall rate of wound complication was 18.9%. Tobacco use increased complication (37.5% vs 16.3%, p < 0.001), as did adjuvant radiation therapy (31.4% vs 17.4%, p = 0.014). Patients with lymph node involvement and larger tumor size had a higher rate of complication (31.3% vs 17.2%, p = 0.016). Patients undergoing circumareolar incisions had a higher rate of complication than those undergoing lateral radial, inframammary fold, or curvilinear incisions (43.5% vs 17.4% vs 17.4% vs 14.3%, respectively, p = 0.018). Six (1%) local chest wall recurrences occurred during the follow-up period, none of which involved the nipple-areolar complex. Four patients (1%) suffered a distant recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Most NSM performed at our institution are in patients with malignancy. The oncologic safety is confirmed by the low locoregional recurrence rate. Tobacco use and adjuvant radiation therapy remain the most significant risk factors for complication, highlighting the need for careful patient selection and patient counseling regarding modifiable risk factors and expected outcomes.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32032724     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  7 in total

1.  Pure hemi-periareolar incision versus conventional lateral radial incision mastectomy and direct-to-implant breast reconstructions: comparison of indocyanine green angiographic perfusion and necrosis of the nipple.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Park; Ik Hyun Seong; Woosung Lim; Kyong-Je Woo
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

2.  Health-Related Quality of Life After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Results From the INSPIRE Registry.

Authors:  Antonio J Esgueva; Iris Noordhoek; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Martin Espinosa-Bravo; Zoltán Mátrai; Andrii Zhygulin; Arvids Irmejs; Carlos Mavioso; Francesco Meani; Eduardo González; Murat Özdemir; Tanir Allweis; Karol Rogowski; Catarina Rodrigues Dos Santos; Henrique Mora; Riccardo Ponzone; Domenico Samorani; Cornelis van de Velde; Riccardo A Audisio; Isabel T Rubio
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Closed-Incision and Surrounding Soft Tissue Negative Pressure Dressings in Post-Mastectomy Pre-Pectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Udai S Sibia; Devinder Singh; Kathryn M Sidrow; Luther H Holton
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 0.558

4.  Mastectomy and Prepectoral Reconstruction in an Ambulatory Surgery Center Reduces Major Infectious Complication Rates.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Schwartz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-07-15

5.  Outcome Analysis Depending on the Different Types of Incision following Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Soo Hyun Woo; Jin Mi Choi; Jin Sup Eom; Eun Key Kim; Hyun Ho Han
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.269

6.  Two-Stage Versus One-Stage Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Timing of Surgery Prevents Nipple Loss.

Authors:  Tammy Ju; Julia Chandler; Arash Momeni; Geoffrey Gurtner; Jacqueline Tsai; Dung Nguyen; Irene Wapnir
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  The Language of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: Can We Do Better?

Authors:  Shamit S Prabhu; Ramon Llull; Adam J Katz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-08-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.