Literature DB >> 32032221

The Merits of Bilateral Application of Bone-Conduction Devices in Children With Bilateral Conductive Hearing Loss.

Chrisje A den Besten1, Katharina Vogt2, Arjan J Bosman1, Ad F M Snik1,2, Myrthe K S Hol1, Martijn J H Agterberg1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to characterize lateralization of sounds and localization of sounds in children with bilateral conductive hearing loss (BCHL) when listening with either one or two percutaneous bone conduction devices (BCDs).
DESIGN: Sound lateralization was measured with the minimum audible angle test in which children were asked to indicate from which of the two visible speakers the sound originated. Sound localization was measured with a test in which stimuli were presented from speakers that were not visible to the children. In the sound localization test, 150 ms broadband noise bursts were presented, and sound level was roved over a 20-dB range. Because speakers were not visible the localization response was not affected by any visual cue. The sound localization test provides a clear distinction between lateralization and localization of sounds. Ten children with congenital BCHL and one child with acquired BCHL participated.
RESULTS: Both lateralization and sound localization were better with bilateral BCDs compared with the unilaterally aided conditions. In the bilateral BCD condition, lateralization was close to normal in nearly all the children. The localization test demonstrated lateralization rather than sound localization behavior when listening with bilateral BCDs. Furthermore, in the unilateral aided condition, stimuli presented at different sound levels were mainly perceived at the same location.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that, in contrast to listening with two BCDs, children demonstrated difficulties in lateralization of sounds and in sound localization when listening with just one BCD (i.e., one BCD turned off). Because both lateralization and sound localization behavior were tested, it could be demonstrated that these children are more able to lateralize than localize sounds when listening with bilateral BCDs. The present study provides insight in (sub-optimal) sound localization capabilities of children with congenital BCHL in the unilateral-aided and bilateral-aided condition. Despite the sub-optimal results on sound localization, this study underlines the merits of bilateral application of BCDs in such children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32032221      PMCID: PMC7116433          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.562


  18 in total

Review 1.  Importance of binaural hearing.

Authors:  Paul Avan; Fabrice Giraudet; Béla Büki
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  On the minimum audible angle--a decision theory approach.

Authors:  W M Hartmann; B Raked
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Richard L Goode
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.

Authors:  A J Bosman; A F Snik; C T van der Pouw; E A Mylanus; C W Cremers
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  2001 May-Jun

Review 5.  Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids for bilateral permanent conductive hearing loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Renée M Janssen; Paul Hong; Neil K Chadha
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.

Authors:  Claudia Priwin; Radi Jönsson; Malou Hultcrantz; Gösta Granström
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Patient satisfaction with bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids: the Birmingham experience.

Authors:  Sunil N Dutt; Ann-Louise McDermott; Stuart P Burrell; Huw R Cooper; Andrew P Reid; David W Proops
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol Suppl       Date:  2002

Review 8.  Bone-anchored hearing aids for people with bilateral hearing impairment: a systematic review.

Authors:  J L Colquitt; E Loveman; D M Baguley; T E Mitchell; P Z Sheehan; P Harris; D W Proops; J Jones; A J Clegg; K Welch
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.597

9.  Three-year experience with the Sophono in children with congenital conductive unilateral hearing loss: tolerability, audiometry, and sound localization compared to a bone-anchored hearing aid.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Martijn J H Agterberg; Myrthe K S Hol; Ad F M Snik
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  The current practice trends in pediatric bone-anchored hearing aids in Canada: a national clinical and surgical practice survey.

Authors:  C Carrie Liu; Neil K Chadha; Manohar Bance; Paul Hong
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-07-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Hearables as a Gateway to Hearing Health Care.

Authors:  Hye Yoon Seol; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.340

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.