Theresa Köbe1,2, Julie Gonneaud1,2, Alexa Pichet Binette1,2, Pierre-François Meyer1,2, Melissa McSweeney1,2, Pedro Rosa-Neto1,2,3, John C S Breitner1,2, Judes Poirier1,2, Sylvia Villeneuve1,2,3,4. 1. Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2. Studies on Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3. Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 4. McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
Importance: Vascular risk factors are associated with increased risk of Alzheimer disease (AD), but it is unclear whether there is a direct association of these risk factors with AD pathogenesis. Objectives: To assess the associations of vascular risk factors with AD pathogenesis in asymptomatic individuals, and to test whether this association is moderated among individuals who use vascular medications. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the Presymptomatic Evaluation of Experimental or Novel Treatments for Alzheimer Disease (PREVENT-AD) cohort of cognitively unimpaired individuals aged 55 to 82 years with a parental or multiple-sibling history of sporadic AD, who were recruited via advertisement from the greater Montreal, Quebec, Canada, metropolitan area. Participants were enrolled between September 9, 2011, to May, 3, 2017, and stratified by use vs no use of vascular medications. Data were analyzed July 1, 2018, to April 5, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Principal analyses investigated associations of total, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and a combined vascular risk score (measured using the Framingham Coronary Risk Profile) with global β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) and entorhinal tau burden as measured by positron emission tomography (PET). Potential moderating associations of use of vascular medications with these associations were examined. Secondary similar analyses considered cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ1-42 and phosphorylated tau levels. Results: Among 215 participants (mean [SD] age, 62.3 [5.0] years; 161 [74.8%] women), 120 participants underwent PET, including 75 participants (62.5%) who were not using vascular medications, and 162 participants underwent CSF assessment, including 113 participants (69.8%) who were not using vascular medications. There was an overlap of 67 participants who underwent PET and CSF assessment. Interaction analyses showed that among participants not using vascular medications, higher Aβ deposition as measured by PET was associated with higher total cholesterol level (β = -0.002 [SE, 0.001]; P = .02), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (β = -0.002 [SE, 0.001]; P = .006), systolic blood pressure (β = -0.006 [SE, 0.002]; P = .02), pulse pressure (β = -0.007 [SE, 0.002]; P = .004), and Framingham Coronary Risk Profile score (β = -0.038 [SE, 0.011]; P = .001), but such associations were absent in participants who used vascular medications. Interactions were also found between vascular medication use and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (β = -3.302 [SE, 1.540]; P = .03), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (β = 1.546 [SE, 0.754]; P = .04), and Framingham Coronary Risk Profile score (β = 23.102 [SE, 10.993]; P = .04) on Aβ1-42 burden as measured in CSF. Higher Framingham Coronary Risk Profile scores were associated with reduced tau burden among participants using vascular medications but not among participants not using vascular medications (interaction, β = -0.010 [SE, 0.005]; P = .046). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings corroborate previously reported associations of vascular risk factors with Aβ burden but not tau burden. However, these associations were found only among individuals who were not using vascular medications. These results suggest that medication use or other control of vascular risk factors should be considered in Alzheimer disease prevention trials.
Importance: Vascular risk factors are associated with increased risk of Alzheimer disease (AD), but it is unclear whether there is a direct association of these risk factors with AD pathogenesis. Objectives: To assess the associations of vascular risk factors with AD pathogenesis in asymptomatic individuals, and to test whether this association is moderated among individuals who use vascular medications. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the Presymptomatic Evaluation of Experimental or Novel Treatments for Alzheimer Disease (PREVENT-AD) cohort of cognitively unimpaired individuals aged 55 to 82 years with a parental or multiple-sibling history of sporadic AD, who were recruited via advertisement from the greater Montreal, Quebec, Canada, metropolitan area. Participants were enrolled between September 9, 2011, to May, 3, 2017, and stratified by use vs no use of vascular medications. Data were analyzed July 1, 2018, to April 5, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Principal analyses investigated associations of total, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and a combined vascular risk score (measured using the Framingham Coronary Risk Profile) with global β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) and entorhinal tau burden as measured by positron emission tomography (PET). Potential moderating associations of use of vascular medications with these associations were examined. Secondary similar analyses considered cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ1-42 and phosphorylated tau levels. Results: Among 215 participants (mean [SD] age, 62.3 [5.0] years; 161 [74.8%] women), 120 participants underwent PET, including 75 participants (62.5%) who were not using vascular medications, and 162 participants underwent CSF assessment, including 113 participants (69.8%) who were not using vascular medications. There was an overlap of 67 participants who underwent PET and CSF assessment. Interaction analyses showed that among participants not using vascular medications, higher Aβ deposition as measured by PET was associated with higher total cholesterol level (β = -0.002 [SE, 0.001]; P = .02), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (β = -0.002 [SE, 0.001]; P = .006), systolic blood pressure (β = -0.006 [SE, 0.002]; P = .02), pulse pressure (β = -0.007 [SE, 0.002]; P = .004), and Framingham Coronary Risk Profile score (β = -0.038 [SE, 0.011]; P = .001), but such associations were absent in participants who used vascular medications. Interactions were also found between vascular medication use and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (β = -3.302 [SE, 1.540]; P = .03), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (β = 1.546 [SE, 0.754]; P = .04), and Framingham Coronary Risk Profile score (β = 23.102 [SE, 10.993]; P = .04) on Aβ1-42 burden as measured in CSF. Higher Framingham Coronary Risk Profile scores were associated with reduced tau burden among participants using vascular medications but not among participants not using vascular medications (interaction, β = -0.010 [SE, 0.005]; P = .046). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings corroborate previously reported associations of vascular risk factors with Aβ burden but not tau burden. However, these associations were found only among individuals who were not using vascular medications. These results suggest that medication use or other control of vascular risk factors should be considered in Alzheimer disease prevention trials.
Authors: Taylor J Krivanek; Seth A Gale; Brittany M McFeeley; Casey M Nicastri; Kirk R Daffner Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Antonio Terracciano; Murat Bilgel; Damaris Aschwanden; Martina Luchetti; Yannick Stephan; Abhay R Moghekar; Dean F Wong; Luigi Ferrucci; Angelina R Sutin; Susan M Resnick Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2021-09-03 Impact factor: 12.810
Authors: Alexa Pichet Binette; Guillaume Theaud; François Rheault; Maggie Roy; D Louis Collins; Johannes Levin; Hiroshi Mori; Jae Hong Lee; Martin Rhys Farlow; Peter Schofield; Jasmeer P Chhatwal; Colin L Masters; Tammie Benzinger; John Morris; Randall Bateman; John Cs Breitner; Judes Poirier; Julie Gonneaud; Maxime Descoteaux; Sylvia Villeneuve Journal: Elife Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Shahram Oveisgharan; Ana W Capuano; Alifiya Kapasi; Aron S Buchman; Julie A Schneider; David A Bennett; Zoe Arvanitakis Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2020 Impact factor: 4.160
Authors: E E Wolters; A Dodich; M Boccardi; J Corre; A Drzezga; O Hansson; A Nordberg; G B Frisoni; V Garibotto; R Ossenkoppele Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-02-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Oana M Dumitrascu; Ryan Rosenberry; Dale S Sherman; Maziyar M Khansari; Julia Sheyn; Tania Torbati; Ayesha Sherzai; Dean Sherzai; Kenneth O Johnson; Alan D Czeszynski; Steven Verdooner; Keith L Black; Sally Frautschy; Patrick D Lyden; Yonggang Shi; Susan Cheng; Yosef Koronyo; Maya Koronyo-Hamaoui Journal: Cells Date: 2021-10-28 Impact factor: 6.600