| Literature DB >> 32030997 |
Xiaopeng Zhou1,2,3, Feng Zhang1,2,3, Dawei Wang1,3, Jingkai Wang1,2,3, Chenggui Wang1,2, Kaishun Xia1,2, Liwei Ying1,2, Xianpeng Huang1,2, Yiqing Tao1,2, Shouyong Chen4, Deting Xue1,2, Jianming Hua5, Chengzhen Liang1,2, Qixin Chen1,2, Fangcai Li1,2.
Abstract
Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration and consequent lower back pain is a common disease. Micro fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) is promising for a wide range of applications in regenerative medicine. In this study, MFAT was isolated by a nonenzymatic method and co-cultured with nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs) using an indirect co-culture system in vitro. A pig disc degeneration model was used to investigate the regenerative effect of MFAT on degenerated IVDs in vivo. The mRNA expression of Sox9, Acan, and Col2 in NPCs was significantly increased, while no significant increase was observed in the mRNA expression of proinflammatory cytokine genes after the NPCs were co-cultured with MFAT. Nucleus pulposus (NP)-specific markers were increased in MFAT cells after co-culture with NPCs. After injection of MFAT, the disc height, water content, extracellular matrix, and structure of the degenerated NP were significantly improved. MFAT promoted the matrix synthesis function of NPCs, and NPCs stimulated the NP-like differentiation of MFAT cells. In addition, MFAT also partly regenerated degenerated IVDs in the pig model.Entities:
Keywords: co-culture; intervertebral disc; micro fragmented adipose tissues; nucleus pulposus cell; pig disc degeneration model
Year: 2020 PMID: 32030997 PMCID: PMC7444234 DOI: 10.1177/0963689720905798
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Transplant ISSN: 0963-6897 Impact factor: 4.064
Primers Used in Quantitative RT-PCR.
| Gene | Forward primer (5’ to 3’) | Reverse primer (5’ to 3’) |
|---|---|---|
| 18s | ATCCTCAGTGAGTTCTCCCG | CTTTGCCATCACTGCCATTA |
| Acan | AGAATCAAGTGGAGCCGTGT | GGTAGTTGGGCAGTGAGACC |
| Sox9 | AGCGAACGCACATCAAGAC | CTGTAGGCGATCTGTTGGGG |
| Col2 | CATCCCACCCTCTCACAGTT | ACCAGTTAGTTTCCTGCCTCTG |
| Col1 | AGTCTGTCCTGCGTCCTCTG | TGTTTGGGTCATTTCCACAT |
| TNF-α | TCAGAGGGCCTGTACCTCAT | GGAGGTTGACCTTGGTCTGG |
| IL-1β | CAGAAGTACCTGAGCTCGCC | AGATTCGTAGCTGGATGCCG |
| IL-6 | CTCATTCTGCCCTCGAGCC | TTGTTACATGTTTGTGGAGAAGG |
| Krt19 | GATAGTGAGCGGCAGAATCA | CCTCCAAAGGACAGCAGAAG |
| Pax1 | GACAATCCCAGGCTACCAAG | GCTCCACTCACAAACAGCAA |
| Gpc3 | CCTTTGAAATTGTTGTTCGCCA | CCTGGGTTCATTAGCTGGGTA |
| Gdf10 | ACTTTGACGAGAAGACGATGC | GGTTGGATGGACGAACGAT |
Figure 1.Isolation and characterization of hADSCs. (A) Cell surface markers expressed by hADSCs were determined by flow cytometry. (B) The multi-lineage differentiation of hADSCs were confirmed by alizarin red staining, Oil Red O staining, and alcian blue staining. hADSCs cultured on plates without induction of differentiation was set as control. N=9; Scale bar = 500 µm.
Figure 2.Effects of MFAT and hADSCs on the matrix synthesis function of hNPCs. (A) Gene expressions of Acan, Sox9, Col2, and Col1 in hNPCs co-cultured with hADSCs or MFAT were measured on days 7 and 14, and normalized to 18 s and to the control group. (B) Protein expression of aggrecan, SOX9, COL2, and COL1 in hNPCs co-cultured with hADSCs or MFAT were measured on day 21. (C-D) hNPCs co-cultured with hADSCs or MFAT by an indirect co-culture system were stained with alcian blue on day 21, and the area of blue staining was quantified. Data represent mean ± SEM; N=9; **p < 0.01. Scale bar = 200 µm.
Figure 3.Effects of co-culture on the inflammation of hNPCs. Gene expressions of (A) TNF-α, (B) IL-1β, and (C) IL-6 in hNPCs co-cultured with hADSCs or MFAT were measured on day 7 and normalized to 18 s and to the control group. Data represent mean ± SEM; N=9; **p < 0.01.
Figure 4.Effects of hNPCs on the differentiation of hADSCs and cells in the MFAT. (A) Gene expressions of Krt19, Pax1, Gpc3, and Gdf10 in each group were measured on days 7 and 14, and normalized to 18 s and to the control group. (B) Protein expression of KRT19, PAX1, GPC3, and GDF10 in each group was measured on day 14. Data represent mean ± SEM; N=9; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 5.Radiographic and MRI assessment of discs in a pig disc degeneration model. (A) Representative radiographs of each group at 0, 4, 8, and 16 weeks after injection. The control, degeneration, MFAT, and ADSCs groups were detected. (B) DHI% was used to quantitatively represent the disc height changes. (C) Representative T2 MRI scans of the pig L1–L2, L2–L3, L3–L4, and L4–L5 lumber IVDs at 0, 4, 8, and 16 weeks after injection. (D) MRI index was used to quantitatively analyze the water content of the NP. Data represent mean ± SEM; N=6; **p < 0.01, vs. control group; ## p < 0.01, vs. MFAT group.
Figure 6.Histological, immunohistochemical, and biochemical analysis of the NP. Representative (A) H&E and Safranin O staining of disc samples from each group at 16 weeks after injection. Scale bar = 1 mm. Immunohistochemical detection of collagen II in the NP from the control, degeneration, MFAT, and ADSCs groups at 16 weeks after injection. Scale bar = 500 µm. The contents of (B) sGAG and (C) hydroxyproline in each group at 16 weeks after injection were quantified. Data represent mean ± SEM; N=6; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, vs. control group; ## p < 0.01, vs. MFAT group.