Literature DB >> 30098570

Optimal electrical stimulation boosts stem cell therapy in nerve regeneration.

Jian Du1, Gehua Zhen2, Huanwen Chen1, Shuming Zhang3, Liming Qing1, Xiuli Yang1, Gabsang Lee4, Hai-Quan Mao3, Xiaofeng Jia5.   

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries often lead to incomplete recovery and contribute to significant disability to approximately 360,000 people in the USA each year. Stem cell therapy holds significant promise for peripheral nerve regeneration, but maintenance of stem cell viability and differentiation potential in vivo are still major obstacles for translation. Using a made-in-house 96-well vertical electrical stimulation (ES) platform, we investigated the effects of different stimulating pulse frequency, duration and field direction on human neural crest stem cell (NCSC) differentiation. We observed dendritic morphology with enhanced neuronal differentiation for NCSCs cultured on cathodes subject to 20 Hz, 100μs pulse at a potential gradient of 200 mV/mm. We further evaluated the effect of a novel cell-based therapy featuring optimized pulsatile ES of NCSCs for in vivo transplantation following peripheral nerve regeneration. 15 mm critical-sized sciatic nerve injuries were generated with subsequent surgical repair in sixty athymic nude rats. Injured animals were randomly assigned into five groups (N = 12 per group): blank control, ES, NCSC, NCSC + ES, and autologous nerve graft. The optimized ES was applied immediately after surgical repair for 1 h in ES and NCSC + ES groups. Recovery was assessed by behavioral (CatWalk gait analysis), wet muscle-mass, histomorphometric, and immunohistochemical analyses at either 6 or 12 weeks after surgery (N = 6 per group). Gastrocnemius muscle wet mass measurements in ES + NCSC group were comparable to autologous nerve transplantation and significantly higher than other groups (p < 0.05). Quantitative histomorphometric analysis and catwalk gait analysis showed similar improvements by ES on NCSCs (p < 0.05). A higher number of viable NCSCs was shown via immunochemical analysis, with higher Schwann cell (SC) differentiation in the NCSC + ES group compared to the NCSC group (p < 0.05). Overall, ES on NCSC transplantation significantly enhanced nerve regeneration after injury and repair, and was comparable to autograft treatment. Thus, ES can be a potent alternative to biochemical and physical cues for modulating stem cell survival and differentiation. This novel cell-based intervention presents an effective and safe approach for improved outcomes after peripheral nerve repair.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrical stimulation; Human neural crest stem cell; Nerve regeneration; Peripheral nerve injury; Pluripotent stem cells

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30098570      PMCID: PMC6201278          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  50 in total

Review 1.  Schwann cells as regulators of nerve development.

Authors:  Rhona Mirsky; Kristjan R Jessen; Angela Brennan; David Parkinson; Ziping Dong; Carola Meier; Eric Parmantier; Durward Lawson
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar

2.  Electrical stimulation accelerates motor functional recovery in autograft-repaired 10 mm femoral nerve gap in rats.

Authors:  Jinghui Huang; Xueyu Hu; Lei Lu; Zhengxu Ye; Yuqing Wang; Zhuojing Luo
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Derivation of neural crest cells from human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Gabsang Lee; Stuart M Chambers; Mark J Tomishima; Lorenz Studer
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Cat hindlimb motoneurons during locomotion. IV. Participation in cutaneous reflexes.

Authors:  G E Loeb; W B Marks; J A Hoffer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Long-term feasibility and biocompatibility of directly microsurgically implanted intrafascicular electrodes in free roaming rabbits.

Authors:  Gehua Zhen; Huanwen Chen; Shin-Yi Tsai; Jian Zhang; Tongyi Chen; Xiaofeng Jia
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.368

6.  The Schwann cell precursor and its fate: a study of cell death and differentiation during gliogenesis in rat embryonic nerves.

Authors:  K R Jessen; A Brennan; L Morgan; R Mirsky; A Kent; Y Hashimoto; J Gavrilovic
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  Augmenting nerve regeneration with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  T Gordon; T M Brushart; K M Chan
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.448

8.  Isolation and directed differentiation of neural crest stem cells derived from human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Gabsang Lee; Hyesoo Kim; Yechiel Elkabetz; George Al Shamy; Georgia Panagiotakos; Tiziano Barberi; Viviane Tabar; Lorenz Studer
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-11-25       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 9.  Practical considerations concerning the use of stem cells for peripheral nerve repair.

Authors:  Sarah Walsh; Rajiv Midha
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 10.  Peripheral nerve reconstruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies.

Authors:  D Grinsell; C P Keating
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  New era of optogenetics: from the central to peripheral nervous system.

Authors:  Xiang Xu; Thomas Mee; Xiaofeng Jia
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 2.  Stem Cell Differentiation into Cardiomyocytes: Current Methods and Emerging Approaches.

Authors:  Elham Afjeh-Dana; Parvaneh Naserzadeh; Elham Moradi; Nasrin Hosseini; Alexander Marcus Seifalian; Behnaz Ashtari
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 3.  Engineering Tissues of the Central Nervous System: Interfacing Conductive Biomaterials with Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells.

Authors:  Rebecca D Bierman-Duquette; Gevick Safarians; Joyce Huang; Bushra Rajput; Jessica Y Chen; Ze Zhong Wang; Stephanie K Seidlits
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 4.  Augmenting Peripheral Nerve Regeneration with Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.

Authors:  Liangfu Jiang; Thomas Mee; Xijie Zhou; Xiaofeng Jia
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 5.739

5.  Neuroprotection of NSC Therapy is Superior to Glibenclamide in Cardiac Arrest-Induced Brain Injury via Neuroinflammation Regulation.

Authors:  Zhuoran Wang; Shuai Zhang; Jian Du; Brittany Bolduc Lachance; Songyu Chen; Brian M Polster; Xiaofeng Jia
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.800

6.  Electrostimulus-triggered reactive oxygen species level in organelles revealed by organelle-targeting SERS nanoprobes.

Authors:  Jiaming Chen; Xiaozhang Qu; Guohua Qi; Weiqing Xu; Yongdong Jin; Shuping Xu
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.478

Review 7.  Biomedical applications of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Siwei Zhao; Abijeet Singh Mehta; Min Zhao
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Effects of Hydrogel-Fiber on Cystic Cavity after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Xijie Zhou; Jian Du; Xiaofeng Jia
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2019-07

Review 9.  Neuromodulation-Based Stem Cell Therapy in Brain Repair: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Ti-Fei Yuan; Yi Dong; Li Zhang; Jieyu Qi; Chun Yao; Yongjun Wang; Renjie Chai; Yan Liu; Kwok-Fai So
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 5.203

10.  Identification of sensory and motor nerve fascicles by immunofluorescence staining after peripheral nerve injury.

Authors:  Xijie Zhou; Jian Du; Liming Qing; Thomas Mee; Xiang Xu; Zhuoran Wang; Cynthia Xu; Xiaofeng Jia
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.