K H Ryu1, H J Baek2,3, S Skare4,5, J I Moon1, B H Choi1, S E Park1, J Y Ha1, T B Kim1, M J Hwang6, T Sprenger4,7. 1. From the Department of Radiology (K.H.R., H.J.B., J.I.M., B.H.C., S.E.P., J.Y.H., T.B.K.), Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea. 2. From the Department of Radiology (K.H.R., H.J.B., J.I.M., B.H.C., S.E.P., J.Y.H., T.B.K.), Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea sartre81@gmail.com. 3. Department of Radiology (H.J.B.), Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Clinical Neuroscience (S.S., T.S.), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. Department of Neuroradiology (S.S.), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 6. MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare (M.J.H.), Seoul, Republic of Korea. 7. MR Applied Science Laboratory Europe (T.S.), GE Healthcare Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The long scan time of MR imaging is a major drawback limiting its clinical use in neuroimaging; therefore, we aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility of a 1-minute full-brain MR imaging using a multicontrast EPI sequence on a different MR imaging scanner than the ones previously reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 146 patients who underwent a multicontrast EPI sequence, including T1-FLAIR, T2-FLAIR, T2WI, DWI, and T2*WI sequences. Two attending neuroradiologists assessed the image quality of each sequence to compare the multicontrast EPI sequence with routine MR imaging protocols. We used the Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar test to compare the 2 MR imaging protocols. RESULTS: The multicontrast EPI sequence generally showed sufficient image quality of >2 points using a 4-point assessment scale. Regarding image quality and susceptibility artifacts, there was no significant difference between the multicontrast EPI sequence DWI and routine DWI (P > .05), attesting to noninferiority of the multicontrast EPI, whereas there were significant differences in the other 4 sequences between the 2 MR imaging protocols. CONCLUSIONS: The multicontrast EPI sequence showed sufficient image quality for clinical use with a shorter scan time; however, it was limited by inferior image quality and frequent susceptibility artifacts compared with routine brain MR imaging. Therefore, the multicontrast EPI sequence cannot completely replace the routine MR imaging protocol at present; however, it may be a feasible option in specific clinical situations such as screening, time-critical diseases or for use with patients prone to motion.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The long scan time of MR imaging is a major drawback limiting its clinical use in neuroimaging; therefore, we aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility of a 1-minute full-brain MR imaging using a multicontrast EPI sequence on a different MR imaging scanner than the ones previously reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 146 patients who underwent a multicontrast EPI sequence, including T1-FLAIR, T2-FLAIR, T2WI, DWI, and T2*WI sequences. Two attending neuroradiologists assessed the image quality of each sequence to compare the multicontrast EPI sequence with routine MR imaging protocols. We used the Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar test to compare the 2 MR imaging protocols. RESULTS: The multicontrast EPI sequence generally showed sufficient image quality of >2 points using a 4-point assessment scale. Regarding image quality and susceptibility artifacts, there was no significant difference between the multicontrast EPI sequence DWI and routine DWI (P > .05), attesting to noninferiority of the multicontrast EPI, whereas there were significant differences in the other 4 sequences between the 2 MR imaging protocols. CONCLUSIONS: The multicontrast EPI sequence showed sufficient image quality for clinical use with a shorter scan time; however, it was limited by inferior image quality and frequent susceptibility artifacts compared with routine brain MR imaging. Therefore, the multicontrast EPI sequence cannot completely replace the routine MR imaging protocol at present; however, it may be a feasible option in specific clinical situations such as screening, time-critical diseases or for use with patients prone to motion.
Authors: Robin M Heidemann; Ozkan Ozsarlak; Paul M Parizel; Johan Michiels; Berthold Kiefer; Vladimir Jellus; Mathias Müller; Felix Breuer; Martin Blaimer; Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-08-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Kyeong Hwa Ryu; Hye Jin Baek; Jin Il Moon; Bo Hwa Choi; Sung Eun Park; Ji Young Ha; Kyung Nyeo Jeon; Kyungsoo Bae; Dae Seob Choi; Soo Buem Cho; Yedaun Lee; Young Jin Heo Journal: J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 3.447
Authors: S F Kralik; M Yasrebi; N Supakul; C Lin; L G Netter; R A Hicks; R A Hibbard; L L Ackerman; M L Harris; C Y Ho Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Supada Prakkamakul; Thomas Witzel; Susie Huang; Daniel Boulter; Maria J Borja; Pamela Schaefer; Bruce Rosen; Keith Heberlein; Eva Ratai; Gilberto Gonzalez; Otto Rapalino Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Andrea K Penzkofer; Thomas Pfluger; Yvonne Pochmann; Oliver Meissner; Gerda Leinsinger Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: B D Niederhauser; R J McDonald; L J Eckel; G F Keating; E M Broomall; N M Wetjen; F E Diehn; K M Schwartz; C H Hunt; K M Welker; D F Kallmes Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Serdest Demir; Bryan Clifford; Wei-Ching Lo; Azadeh Tabari; Augusto Lio M Goncalves Filho; Min Lang; Stephen F Cauley; Kawin Setsompop; Berkin Bilgic; Michael H Lev; Pamela W Schaefer; Otto Rapalino; Susie Y Huang; Tom Hilbert; Thorsten Feiweier; John Conklin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Harriet Hobday; James H Cole; Ryan A Stanyard; Richard E Daws; Vincent Giampietro; Owen O'Daly; Robert Leech; František Váša Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Siri Af Burén; Annika Kits; Lucas Lönn; Francesca De Luca; Tim Sprenger; Stefan Skare; Anna Falk Delgado Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 5.119
Authors: František Váša; Harriet Hobday; Ryan A Stanyard; Richard E Daws; Vincent Giampietro; Owen O'Daly; David J Lythgoe; Jakob Seidlitz; Stefan Skare; Steven C R Williams; Andre F Marquand; Robert Leech; James H Cole Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 5.399