PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of magnetization transfer (MT) on brain tissue contrast in turbo-spin-echo (TSE) and EPI fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images, and to optimize an MT-prepared EPI FLAIR pulse sequence to match the tissue contrast of a clinical reference TSE FLAIR protocol. METHODS: Five healthy volunteers underwent 3T brain MRI, including single slice TSE FLAIR, multi-slice TSE FLAIR, EPI FLAIR without MT-preparation, and MT-prepared EPI FLAIR with variations of the MT-preparation parameters, including number of preparation pulses, pulse amplitude, and resonance offset. Automated co-registration and gray matter (GM) versus white matter (WM) segmentation was performed using a T1-MPRAGE acquisition, and the GM versus WM signal intensity ratio (contrast ratio) was calculated for each FLAIR acquisition. RESULTS: Without MT preparation, EPI FLAIR showed poor tissue contrast (contrast ratio = 0.98), as did single slice TSE FLAIR. Multi-slice TSE FLAIR provided high tissue contrast (contrast ratio = 1.14). MT-prepared EPI FLAIR closely approximated the contrast of the multi-slice TSE FLAIR images for two combinations of the MT-preparation parameters (contrast ratio = 1.14). Optimized MT-prepared EPI FLAIR provided a 50% reduction in scan time compared to the reference TSE FLAIR acquisition. CONCLUSION: Optimized MT-prepared EPI FLAIR provides comparable brain tissue contrast to the multi-slice TSE FLAIR images used in clinical practice.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of magnetization transfer (MT) on brain tissue contrast in turbo-spin-echo (TSE) and EPI fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images, and to optimize an MT-prepared EPI FLAIR pulse sequence to match the tissue contrast of a clinical reference TSE FLAIR protocol. METHODS: Five healthy volunteers underwent 3T brain MRI, including single slice TSE FLAIR, multi-slice TSE FLAIR, EPI FLAIR without MT-preparation, and MT-prepared EPI FLAIR with variations of the MT-preparation parameters, including number of preparation pulses, pulse amplitude, and resonance offset. Automated co-registration and gray matter (GM) versus white matter (WM) segmentation was performed using a T1-MPRAGE acquisition, and the GM versus WM signal intensity ratio (contrast ratio) was calculated for each FLAIR acquisition. RESULTS: Without MT preparation, EPI FLAIR showed poor tissue contrast (contrast ratio = 0.98), as did single slice TSE FLAIR. Multi-slice TSE FLAIR provided high tissue contrast (contrast ratio = 1.14). MT-prepared EPI FLAIR closely approximated the contrast of the multi-slice TSE FLAIR images for two combinations of the MT-preparation parameters (contrast ratio = 1.14). Optimized MT-prepared EPI FLAIR provided a 50% reduction in scan time compared to the reference TSE FLAIR acquisition. CONCLUSION: Optimized MT-prepared EPI FLAIR provides comparable brain tissue contrast to the multi-slice TSE FLAIR images used in clinical practice.
Authors: Anna F Delgado; Annika Kits; Jessica Bystam; Magnus Kaijser; Mikael Skorpil; Tim Sprenger; Stefan Skare Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Marcello Moccia; Steven van de Pavert; Arman Eshaghi; Lukas Haider; Jonas Pichat; Marios Yiannakas; Sebastien Ourselin; Yi Wang; Claudia Wheeler-Kingshott; Alan Thompson; Frederik Barkhof; Olga Ciccarelli Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Lee H Schwamm; Ona Wu; Shlee S Song; Lawrence L Latour; Andria L Ford; Amie W Hsia; Alona Muzikansky; Rebecca A Betensky; Albert J Yoo; Michael H Lev; Gregoire Boulouis; Arne Lauer; Pedro Cougo; William A Copen; Gordon J Harris; Steven Warach Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Ziad S Saad; Daniel R Glen; Gang Chen; Michael S Beauchamp; Rutvik Desai; Robert W Cox Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-10-11 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kambiz Nael; Rihan Khan; Gagandeep Choudhary; Arash Meshksar; Pablo Villablanca; Jennifer Tay; Kendra Drake; Bruce M Coull; Chelsea S Kidwell Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 7.914