Literature DB >> 32029401

Short- and long-term adverse events in patients on temporary circulatory support before durable ventricular assist device: An IMACS registry analysis.

Van-Khue Ton1, Rongbing Xie2, Jaime A Hernandez-Montfort3, Bart Meyns4, Takeshi Nakatani5, Masanobu Yanase6, Steve Shaw7, Stephen Pettit8, Ivan Netuka9, James Kirklin2, Daniel J Goldstein10, Jennifer Cowger11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) needing temporary circulatory support (TCS) have poor survival rates after implantation of durable ventricular assist device (dVAD). We aimed to characterize post-dVAD adverse event burden and survival rates in patients requiring pre-operative TCS.
METHOD: We analyzed 13,511 adults (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support [INTERMACS] Profiles 1-3) with continuous-flow dVADs in International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (2013-2017) according to the need for pre-operative TCS (n = 5,632) vs no TCS (n = 7,879). Of these, 726 (5.4%) had biventricular assist devices (BiVAD). Furthermore, we compared prevalent rates (events/100 patient-months) of bleeding, device-related infection, hemorrhagic and ischemic cerebrovascular accidents (hemorrhagic cerebral vascular accident [hCVA], and ischemic cerebral vascular accident [iCVA]) in early (<3 months) and late (≥3 months) post-operative periods.
RESULTS: TCS included extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (n = 1,138), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) (n = 3,901), and other TCS (n = 593). Within 3 post-operative months, there were more major bleeding and cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) in patients with pre-operative ECMO (events/100 patient-months rates: bleeding = 19, hCVA = 1.6, iCVA = 2.8) or IABP (bleeding = 17.3, hCVA = 1.5, iCVA = 1.5) vs no TCS (bleeding = 13.2, hCVA = 1.1, iCVA = 1.2, all p < 0.05). After 3 months, adverse events were lower and similar in all groups. Patients with ECMO had the worst short- and long-term survival rates. Patients with BiVAD had the worst survival rate regardless of need for pre-operative TCS. CVA and multiorgan failures were the common causes of death for patients with TCS and patients without TCS.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring TCS before dVAD had a sicker phenotype and higher rates of early post-operative adverse events than patients without TCS. ECMO was associated with very high early ischemic stroke, bleeding, and mortality. The extreme CS phenotype needing ECMO warrants a higher-level profile status, such as INTERMACS "0."
Copyright © 2020 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse events; bleeding stroke; cardiogenic shock; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; mortality; temporary mechanical circulatory support; ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32029401     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  6 in total

Review 1.  Neurocritical Care of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.

Authors:  Aaron Shoskes; Glenn Whitman; Sung-Min Cho
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Long-term biventricular circulatory support with POLVAD-MEV paracorporeal pulsatile pumps. Single-centre experience.

Authors:  Tomasz K Urbanowicz; Hanna Baszyńska-Wachowiak; Anna Olasińska-Wiśniewska; Marcin Misterski; Sebastian Stefaniak; Marcin Ligowski; Marek Jemielity
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2020-07-20

3.  A Novel Hybrid Membrane VAD as First Step Toward Hemocompatible Blood Propulsion.

Authors:  Aldo Ferrari; Costanza Giampietro; Björn Bachmann; Laura Bernardi; Deon Bezuidenhhout; Paolo Ermanni; Raoul Hopf; Sarah Kitz; Gerald Kress; Christian Loosli; Vita Marina; Mirko Meboldt; Giovanni Pellegrini; Dimos Poulikakos; Mathias Rebholz; Marianne Schmid Daners; Tanja Schmidt; Christoph Starck; Georgios Stefopoulos; Simon Sündermann; Bente Thamsen; Peter Zilla; Evgenij Potapov; Volkmar Falk; Edoardo Mazza
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  The good, the bad, the ugly: Optimal left ventricular assist device duration in bridge to transplantation.

Authors:  Matthew L Goodwin; Hiroshi Kagawa; Craig H Selzman
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-10-22

Review 5.  Mechanical Support in Early Cardiogenic Shock: What Is the Role of Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation?

Authors:  Jesse R Kimman; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Henrik Endeman; Jasper J Brugts; Alina A Constantinescu; Olivier C Manintveld; Eric A Dubois; Corstiaan A den Uil
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2020-10

6.  Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Bridge to Replacement Therapies in Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization.

Authors:  Ioannis Mastoris; Joseph E Tonna; Jinxiang Hu; Andrew J Sauer; Nicholas A Haglund; Peter Rycus; Yu Wang; William J Wallisch; Travis O Abicht; Matthew R Danter; Ryan J Tedford; James C Fang; Zubair Shah
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 8.790

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.