Literature DB >> 32029323

Development of a guinea pig inhalational anthrax model for evaluation of post-exposure prophylaxis efficacy of anthrax vaccines.

Mark R Perry1, Boris Ionin2, Roy E Barnewall1, Michelle L Vassar1, Joshua J Reece2, Sukjoon Park2, Laurence Lemiale2, Mario H Skiadopoulos2, Jeffry D Shearer2, Vladimir Savransky3.   

Abstract

A next-generation anthrax vaccine candidate, AV7909, is being developed for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) of inhalational anthrax in combination with the recommended course of antimicrobial therapy. Clinical efficacy studies of anthrax countermeasures in humans are not ethical or feasible, therefore, licensure of AV7909 for PEP is being pursued under the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Animal Rule, which requires that evidence of effectiveness be demonstrated in an animal model of anthrax, where results of studies in such a model can establish reasonable likelihood of AV7909 to produce clinical benefit in humans. Initial development of a PEP model for inhalational anthrax included evaluation of post-exposure ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics (PK), tolerability and survival in guinea pigs treated with various ciprofloxacin dosing regimens. Three times per day (TID) intraperitoneal (IP) dosing with 7.5 mg/kg of ciprofloxacin initiated 1 day following inhalational anthrax challenge and continued for 14 days was identified as a well tolerated partially curative ciprofloxacin treatment regimen. The added benefit of AV7909 vaccination was evaluated in guinea pigs given the partially curative ciprofloxacin treatment regimen. Groups of ciprofloxacin-treated guinea pigs were vaccinated. 1 and 8 days post-challenge with serial dilutions of AV7909, a 1:16 dilution of AVA, or normal saline. A group of untreated guinea pigs was included as a positive control to confirm lethal B. anthracis exposure. Post-exposure vaccination with the AV7909 anthrax vaccine candidate administered in combination with the partially curative ciprofloxacin treatment significantly increased survival of guinea pigs compared to ciprofloxacin treatment alone. These results suggest that the developed model can be useful in demonstrating added value of the vaccine for PEP.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal model; Anthrax; Ciprofloxacin; Post-exposure prophylaxis; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32029323      PMCID: PMC8905666          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  28 in total

1.  Observations on the prophylaxis of experimental pulmonary anthrax in the monkey.

Authors:  D W HENDERSON; S PEACOCK; F C BELTON
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1956-03

2.  Increased potency of BioThrax anthrax vaccine with the addition of the C-class CpG oligonucleotide adjuvant CPG 10109.

Authors:  Mili Gu; Paul M Hine; W James Jackson; Lallan Giri; Gary S Nabors
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Field Evaluation of a Human Anthrax Vaccine.

Authors:  P S Brachman; H Gold; S A Plotkin; F R Fekety; M Werrin; N R Ingraham
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1962-04

4.  Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin.

Authors:  P F Fellows; M K Linscott; B E Ivins; M L Pitt; C A Rossi; P H Gibbs; A M Friedlander
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2001-04-30       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Marked enhancement of the immune response to BioThrax® (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed) by the TLR9 agonist CPG 7909 in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Dianna Rynkiewicz; Melinda Rathkopf; Iain Sim; A Thomas Waytes; Robert J Hopkins; Lallan Giri; Deborah DeMuria; Janet Ransom; James Quinn; Gary S Nabors; Carl J Nielsen
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense.

Authors:  T V Inglesby; D A Henderson; J G Bartlett; M S Ascher; E Eitzen; A M Friedlander; J Hauer; J McDade; M T Osterholm; T O'Toole; G Parker; T M Perl; P K Russell; K Tonat
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  MICs of selected antibiotics for Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis, and Bacillus mycoides from a range of clinical and environmental sources as determined by the Etest.

Authors:  Peter C B Turnbull; Nicky M Sirianni; Carlos I LeBron; Marian N Samaan; Felicia N Sutton; Anatalio E Reyes; Leonard F Peruski
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of three vaccination schedules and two dose levels of AV7909 vaccine for anthrax post-exposure prophylaxis in healthy adults.

Authors:  Robert J Hopkins; Gurdyal Kalsi; Victor M Montalvo-Lugo; Mona Sharma; Yukun Wu; Derek D Muse; Eric A Sheldon; Frank C Hampel; Laurence Lemiale
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety and immunogenicity study of 4 formulations of Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed plus CPG 7909 (AV7909) in healthy adult volunteers.

Authors:  Robert J Hopkins; Nancy F Daczkowski; Paulina E Kaptur; Derek Muse; Eric Sheldon; Craig LaForce; Suha Sari; Thomas L Rudge; Edward Bernton
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 10.  Anthrax toxin.

Authors:  R John Collier; John A T Young
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 13.827

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Current Status and Trends in Prophylaxis and Management of Anthrax Disease.

Authors:  Vladimir Savransky; Boris Ionin; Joshua Reece
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-05-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.