Literature DB >> 26979136

Randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of three vaccination schedules and two dose levels of AV7909 vaccine for anthrax post-exposure prophylaxis in healthy adults.

Robert J Hopkins1, Gurdyal Kalsi2, Victor M Montalvo-Lugo2, Mona Sharma2, Yukun Wu2, Derek D Muse3, Eric A Sheldon4, Frank C Hampel5, Laurence Lemiale2.   

Abstract

AV7909 vaccine being developed for post-exposure prophylaxis of anthrax disease may require fewer vaccinations and reduced amount of antigen to achieve an accelerated immune response over BioThrax(®) (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed). A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, BioThrax vacccine-controlled study was conducted to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of three intramuscular vaccination schedules and two dose levels of AV7909 in 168 healthy adults. Subjects were randomized at a 4:3:2:4:2 ratio to 5 groups: (1) AV7909 on Days 0/14; (2) AV7909 on Days 0/28; (3) AV7909 on Days 0/14/28; (4) half dose AV7909 on Days 0/14/28; and (5) BioThrax vaccine on Days 0/14/28. Vaccinations in all groups were well tolerated. The incidences of adverse events (AEs) were 79% for AV7909 subjects and 65% for BioThrax subjects; 92% of AV7909 subjects and 87% of BioThrax subjects having AEs reported Grade 1-2 AEs. No serious AEs were assessed as potentially vaccine-related, and no AEs of potential autoimmune etiology were reported. There was no discernible pattern indicative of a safety concern across groups in the incidence or severity of reactogenicity events. Groups 2-4 achieved success for the primary endpoint, demonstrated by a lower 95% confidence limit of the percentage of subjects with protective toxin neutralizing antibody NF50 values (≥0.56) to be ≥40% at Day 63. Group 1 marginally missed the criterion (lower bound 95% confidence limit of 39.5%). Immune responses were above this threshold for Groups 1, 3 and 4 at Day 28 and all groups at Day 42. Further study of an AV7909 two-dose schedule given 2 weeks apart is warranted in light of the favorable tolerability profile and immunogenicity response relative to three doses of BioThrax vaccine, as well as preliminary data from nonclinical studies indicating similar immune responses correlate with higher survival for AV7909 than BioThrax vaccine.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthrax; BioThrax(®) (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed); CPG 7909; Post-exposure prophylaxis; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26979136      PMCID: PMC4839983          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  11 in total

1.  Observations on the prophylaxis of experimental pulmonary anthrax in the monkey.

Authors:  D W HENDERSON; S PEACOCK; F C BELTON
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1956-03

2.  Co-administration of CpG oligonucleotides enhances the late affinity maturation process of human anti-hepatitis B vaccine response.

Authors:  Claire-Anne Siegrist; Maria Pihlgren; Chantal Tougne; Sue M Efler; Mary Lou Morris; Mohammed J AlAdhami; D William Cameron; Curtis L Cooper; Jenny Heathcote; Heather L Davis; Paul-Henri Lambert
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Evaluation of immunogenicity and efficacy of anthrax vaccine adsorbed for postexposure prophylaxis.

Authors:  Boris Ionin; Robert J Hopkins; Brett Pleune; Gloria S Sivko; Frances M Reid; Kristin H Clement; Thomas L Rudge; Gregory V Stark; Alison Innes; Suha Sari; Tina Guina; Cris Howard; Jeffrey Smith; M Lisa Swoboda; Ekaterina Vert-Wong; Virginia Johnson; Gary S Nabors; Mario H Skiadopoulos
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-05-08

4.  Marked enhancement of the immune response to BioThrax® (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed) by the TLR9 agonist CPG 7909 in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Dianna Rynkiewicz; Melinda Rathkopf; Iain Sim; A Thomas Waytes; Robert J Hopkins; Lallan Giri; Deborah DeMuria; Janet Ransom; James Quinn; Gary S Nabors; Carl J Nielsen
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Use of anthrax vaccine in the United States: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2009.

Authors:  Jennifer Gordon Wright; Conrad P Quinn; Sean Shadomy; Nancy Messonnier
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2010-07-23

6.  Effects of a reduced dose schedule and intramuscular administration of anthrax vaccine adsorbed on immunogenicity and safety at 7 months: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Nina Marano; Brian D Plikaytis; Stacey W Martin; Charles Rose; Vera A Semenova; Sandra K Martin; Alison E Freeman; Han Li; Mark J Mulligan; Scott D Parker; Janiine Babcock; Wendy Keitel; Hana El Sahly; Gregory A Poland; Robert M Jacobson; Harry L Keyserling; Stephen D Soroka; Sarah P Fox; John L Stamper; Michael M McNeil; Bradley A Perkins; Nancy Messonnier; Conrad P Quinn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety and immunogenicity study of 4 formulations of Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed plus CPG 7909 (AV7909) in healthy adult volunteers.

Authors:  Robert J Hopkins; Nancy F Daczkowski; Paulina E Kaptur; Derek Muse; Eric Sheldon; Craig LaForce; Suha Sari; Thomas L Rudge; Edward Bernton
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Effect of CpG oligonucleotides on vaccine-induced B cell memory.

Authors:  Debra Tross; Dennis M Klinman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Antimicrobial postexposure prophylaxis for anthrax: adverse events and adherence.

Authors:  Colin W Shepard; Montse Soriano-Gabarro; Elizabeth R Zell; James Hayslett; Susan Lukacs; Susan Goldstein; Stephanie Factor; Joshua Jones; Renee Ridzon; Ian Williams; Nancy Rosenstein
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Effect of reduced dose schedules and intramuscular injection of anthrax vaccine adsorbed on immunological response and safety profile: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jennifer G Wright; Brian D Plikaytis; Charles E Rose; Scott D Parker; Janiine Babcock; Wendy Keitel; Hana El Sahly; Gregory A Poland; Robert M Jacobson; Harry L Keyserling; Vera A Semenova; Han Li; Jarad Schiffer; Hanan Dababneh; Sandra K Martin; Stacey W Martin; Nina Marano; Nancy E Messonnier; Conrad P Quinn
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 4.169

View more
  16 in total

1.  Correlation between anthrax lethal toxin neutralizing antibody levels and survival in guinea pigs and nonhuman primates vaccinated with the AV7909 anthrax vaccine candidate.

Authors:  Vladimir Savransky; Jeffry D Shearer; Melicia R Gainey; Daniel C Sanford; Gloria S Sivko; Gregory V Stark; Na Li; Boris Ionin; Michael J Lacy; Mario H Skiadopoulos
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Combination of TLR8 and TLR4 agonists reduces the degrading effects of nicotine on DC-NK mediated effector T cell generation.

Authors:  Mahyar Nouri-Shirazi; Saba Tamjidi; Erika Nourishirazi; Elisabeth Guinet
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.932

3.  TLR8 combined withTLR3 or TLR4 agonists enhances DC-NK driven effector Tc1 cells.

Authors:  Mahyar Nouri-Shirazi; Saba Tamjidi; Erika Nourishirazi; Elisabeth Guinet
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.685

4.  Development of a guinea pig inhalational anthrax model for evaluation of post-exposure prophylaxis efficacy of anthrax vaccines.

Authors:  Mark R Perry; Boris Ionin; Roy E Barnewall; Michelle L Vassar; Joshua J Reece; Sukjoon Park; Laurence Lemiale; Mario H Skiadopoulos; Jeffry D Shearer; Vladimir Savransky
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 5.  Biodefence research two decades on: worth the investment?

Authors:  Carrie M Long; Andrea Marzi
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 71.421

Review 6.  Current Status and Trends in Prophylaxis and Management of Anthrax Disease.

Authors:  Vladimir Savransky; Boris Ionin; Joshua Reece
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-05-12

7.  Sulfated archaeol glycolipids: Comparison with other immunological adjuvants in mice.

Authors:  Bassel Akache; Felicity C Stark; Yimei Jia; Lise Deschatelets; Renu Dudani; Blair A Harrison; Gerard Agbayani; Dean Williams; Mohammad P Jamshidi; Lakshmi Krishnan; Michael J McCluskie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of the AV7909 Anthrax Vaccine Toxicity in Sprague Dawley Rats Following Three Intramuscular Administrations.

Authors:  Veena V Rao; C Steven Godin; Michael J Lacy; Jon R Inglefield; Sukjoon Park; Bruna Blauth; Joshua J Reece; Boris Ionin; Vladimir Savransky
Journal:  Int J Toxicol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.032

9.  Anthrax immune globulin improves hemodynamics and survival during B. anthracis toxin-induced shock in canines receiving titrated fluid and vasopressor support.

Authors:  Dante A Suffredini; Xizhong Cui; Dharmvir Jaswal; Kenneth E Remy; Yan Li; Junfeng Sun; Steven B Solomon; Yvonne Fitz; Mahtab Moayeri; Stephen Leppla; Peter Q Eichacker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2017-10-23

10.  Analysis of the dose-sparing effect of adjuvanted Sabin-inactivated poliovirus vaccine (sIPV).

Authors:  Zhuofan Li; Wenting Ding; Qi Guo; Ze Liu; Zhe Zhu; Shaohui Song; Weidong Li; Guoyang Liao
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.