Literature DB >> 32028211

The impact of the Cook County, IL, Sweetened Beverage Tax on beverage prices.

Lisa M Powell1, Julien Leider2, Pierre Thomas Léger3.   

Abstract

This study assessed the extent to which the Cook County, IL, Sweetened Beverage Tax (SBT) of one cent per ounce (oz) on sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverages was passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. We drew on universal product code-level store scanner data and used a pre-post intervention-comparison site difference-in-differences (DID) study design to estimate the impact of the Cook County SBT on prices of taxed beverages, across product categories and sizes, as well as on prices of untaxed beverages. The DID model results showed an over-shifting of the tax with a 119% pass-through rate, on average, across all taxed beverages in Cook County compared to its comparison site. This price change represented, on average, a 34% increase in prices of taxed beverages. For untaxed beverages, prices were estimated to increase slightly by 0.04 cents per oz driven mainly by an increase in milk prices (0.12 cents per oz). We also found some heterogeneity in tax pass-through for the taxed beverages by sweetened beverage product category and size with pass-through being higher, on average, for individual-size (126%) compared to family-size (117%) beverages and higher for energy drinks (145%) compared to other sweetened beverages. Based on the baseline prices of different categories and sizes of beverages, the effective percentage increase in beverage prices resulting from the Cook County SBT ranged from a 52% increase for family-size soda to a 10% increase for family-size energy drinks.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fiscal policy; Sweetened beverage tax; Tax pass-through; Tax policy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32028211     DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Econ Hum Biol        ISSN: 1570-677X            Impact factor:   2.184


  6 in total

1.  Sustained Impact of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Beverage Prices and Sales Over 2 Years.

Authors:  Joshua Petimar; Laura A Gibson; Jiali Yan; Sara N Bleich; Nandita Mitra; Marsha L Trego; Hannah G Lawman; Christina A Roberto
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.604

2.  Outcomes Following Taxation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tatiana Andreyeva; Keith Marple; Samantha Marinello; Timothy E Moore; Lisa M Powell
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  The Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois: Lessons From a Failed Effort.

Authors:  Jamie F Chriqui; Christina N Sansone; Lisa M Powell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 11.561

4.  Pass-through of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax in food stores two years post-implementation: A difference-in-differences study.

Authors:  Julien Leider; Yu Li; Lisa M Powell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of Changes in Grams of Sugar Sold After the Implementation of the Seattle Sweetened Beverage Tax.

Authors:  Lisa M Powell; Julien Leider; Vanessa M Oddo
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

6.  Association of a Sweetened Beverage Tax With Purchases of Beverages and High-Sugar Foods at Independent Stores in Philadelphia.

Authors:  Sara N Bleich; Caroline G Dunn; Mark J Soto; Jiali Yan; Laura A Gibson; Hannah G Lawman; Nandita Mitra; Caitlin M Lowery; Ana Peterhans; Sophia V Hua; Christina A Roberto
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-06-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.