Literature DB >> 32027343

Association of Maximal Extent of Resection of Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Tumor With Survival Within Molecular Subgroups of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

Annette M Molinaro1, Shawn Hervey-Jumper1, Ramin A Morshed1, Jacob Young1, Seunggu J Han2, Pranathi Chunduru1, Yalan Zhang1, Joanna J Phillips1,3, Anny Shai1, Marisa Lafontaine4, Jason Crane4, Ankush Chandra1, Patrick Flanigan1, Arman Jahangiri5, Gino Cioffi6, Quinn Ostrom7, John E Anderson6,8, Chaitra Badve6,8, Jill Barnholtz-Sloan6,9, Andrew E Sloan6,10, Bradley J Erickson11, Paul A Decker11, Matthew L Kosel11, Daniel LaChance11, Jeanette Eckel-Passow11, Robert Jenkins11, Javier Villanueva-Meyer4, Terri Rice1, Margaret Wrensch1, John K Wiencke1, Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush1,12, Jennie Taylor1,12, Nicholas Butowski1, Michael Prados1, Jennifer Clarke1,12, Susan Chang1, Edward Chang1, Manish Aghi1, Philip Theodosopoulos1, Michael McDermott1, Mitchel S Berger1.   

Abstract

Importance: Per the World Health Organization 2016 integrative classification, newly diagnosed glioblastomas are separated into isocitrate dehydrogenase gene 1 or 2 (IDH)-wild-type and IDH-mutant subtypes, with median patient survival of 1.2 and 3.6 years, respectively. Although maximal resection of contrast-enhanced (CE) tumor is associated with longer survival, the prognostic importance of maximal resection within molecular subgroups and the potential importance of resection of non-contrast-enhanced (NCE) disease is poorly understood. Objective: To assess the association of resection of CE and NCE tumors in conjunction with molecular and clinical information to develop a new road map for cytoreductive surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included a development cohort from the University of California, San Francisco (761 patients diagnosed from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2017, with 9.6 years of follow-up) and validation cohorts from the Mayo Clinic (107 patients diagnosed from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2014, with 5.7 years of follow-up) and the Ohio Brain Tumor Study (99 patients with data collected from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2011, with a median follow-up of 10.9 months). Image accessors were blinded to patient groupings. Eligible patients underwent surgical resection for newly diagnosed glioblastoma and had available survival, molecular, and clinical data and preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance images. Data were analyzed from November 15, 2018, to March 15, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival.
Results: Among the 761 patients included in the development cohort (468 [61.5%] men; median age, 60 [interquartile range, 51.6-67.7] years), younger patients with IDH-wild-type tumors and aggressive resection of CE and NCE tumors had survival similar to that of patients with IDH-mutant tumors (median overall survival [OS], 37.3 [95% CI, 31.6-70.7] months). Younger patients with IDH-wild-type tumors and reduction of CE tumor but residual NCE tumors fared worse (median OS, 16.5 [95% CI, 14.7-18.3] months). Older patients with IDH-wild-type tumors benefited from reduction of CE tumor (median OS, 12.4 [95% CI, 11.4-14.0] months). The results were validated in the 2 external cohorts. The association between aggressive CE and NCE in patients with IDH-wild-type tumors was not attenuated by the methylation status of the promoter region of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. Conclusions and Relevance: This study confirms an association between maximal resection of CE tumor and OS in patients with glioblastoma across all subgroups. In addition, maximal resection of NCE tumor was associated with longer OS in younger patients, regardless of IDH status, and among patients with IDH-wild-type glioblastoma regardless of the methylation status of the promoter region of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. These conclusions may help reassess surgical strategies for individual patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32027343      PMCID: PMC7042822          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   33.006


  26 in total

1.  Association of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status With Survival Outcomes in Patients With High-Risk Glioma Treated With Radiotherapy and Temozolomide: An Analysis From the NRG Oncology/RTOG 0424 Trial.

Authors:  Erica H Bell; Peixin Zhang; Barbara J Fisher; David R Macdonald; Joseph P McElroy; Glenn J Lesser; Jessica Fleming; Arup R Chakraborty; Ziyan Liu; Aline P Becker; Denise Fabian; Kenneth D Aldape; Lynn S Ashby; Maria Werner-Wasik; Eleanor M Walker; Jean-Paul Bahary; Young Kwok; H Michael Yu; Nadia N Laack; Christopher J Schultz; Heidi J Gray; H Ian Robins; Minesh P Mehta; Arnab Chakravarti
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 2.  Non-Contrast-Enhancing Tumor: A New Frontier in Glioblastoma Research.

Authors:  A Lasocki; F Gaillard
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial.

Authors:  Walter Stummer; Uwe Pichlmeier; Thomas Meinel; Otmar Dieter Wiestler; Friedhelm Zanella; Hans-Jürgen Reulen
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 4.  The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.

Authors:  David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 17.088

5.  partDSA: deletion/substitution/addition algorithm for partitioning the covariate space in prediction.

Authors:  Annette M Molinaro; Karen Lostritto; Mark van der Laan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  A partitioning deletion/substitution/addition algorithm for creating survival risk groups.

Authors:  Karen Lostritto; Robert L Strawderman; Annette M Molinaro
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Functional outcome after language mapping for glioma resection.

Authors:  Nader Sanai; Zaman Mirzadeh; Mitchel S Berger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Independent association of extent of resection with survival in patients with malignant brain astrocytoma.

Authors:  Matthew J McGirt; Kaisorn L Chaichana; Muraya Gathinji; Frank J Attenello; Khoi Than; Alessandro Olivi; Jon D Weingart; Henry Brem; Alf Redo Quiñones-Hinojosa
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 9.  MGMT testing--the challenges for biomarker-based glioma treatment.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller; Martin van den Bent; Marc Sanson; Markus Weiler; Andreas von Deimling; Christoph Plass; Monika Hegi; Michael Platten; Guido Reifenberger
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  The influence of maximum safe resection of glioblastoma on survival in 1229 patients: Can we do better than gross-total resection?

Authors:  Yan Michael Li; Dima Suki; Kenneth Hess; Raymond Sawaya
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  80 in total

1.  Error in Institution Name in the Text.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Extent of resection is important across glioblastoma molecular subtypes.

Authors:  David Killock
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Management, functional outcomes and survival in a French multicentric series of 118 adult patients with cerebellar glioblastoma.

Authors:  Luc Bauchet; Jacques Guyotat; Thiébaud Picart; David Meyronet; Johan Pallud; Chloé Dumot; Philippe Metellus; Sonia Zouaoui; Moncef Berhouma; François Ducray
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  A contemporary update on glioblastoma: molecular biology, current management, and a vision towards bio-adaptable personalized care.

Authors:  Ahmed Habib; Matthew Pease; Chowdari V Kodavali; Nduka Amankulor; Pascal O Zinn
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Role of traditional CHO PET parameters in distinguishing IDH, TERT and MGMT alterations in primary diffuse gliomas.

Authors:  Yucheng Zhang; Delin Liu; Ziren Kong; Penghao Liu; Yixin Shi; Yaning Wang; Dachun Zhao; Xin Cheng; Yu Wang; Wenbin Ma
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.668

6.  Contribution of PET imaging to radiotherapy planning and monitoring in glioma patients - a report of the PET/RANO group.

Authors:  Norbert Galldiks; Maximilian Niyazi; Anca L Grosu; Martin Kocher; Karl-Josef Langen; Ian Law; Giuseppe Minniti; Michelle M Kim; Christina Tsien; Frederic Dhermain; Riccardo Soffietti; Minesh P Mehta; Michael Weller; Jörg-Christian Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  Intraoperative Imaging for High-Grade Glioma Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Noh; Martina Mustroph; Alexandra J Golby
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  Worse prognosis for IDH wild-type diffuse gliomas with larger residual biological tumor burden.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tatekawa; Hiroyuki Uetani; Akifumi Hagiwara; Shadfar Bahri; Catalina Raymond; Albert Lai; Timothy F Cloughesy; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Linda M Liau; Whitney B Pope; Noriko Salamon; Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.668

9.  Preoperative nTMS and Intraoperative Neurophysiology - A Comparative Analysis in Patients With Motor-Eloquent Glioma.

Authors:  Tizian Rosenstock; Mehmet Salih Tuncer; Max Richard Münch; Peter Vajkoczy; Thomas Picht; Katharina Faust
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Intraoperative B-Mode Ultrasound Guided Surgery and the Extent of Glioblastoma Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Fatih Incekara; Marion Smits; Linda Dirven; Eelke M Bos; Rutger K Balvers; Iain K Haitsma; Joost W Schouten; Arnaud J P E Vincent
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.