Ahmed Habib1,2, Matthew Pease1, Chowdari V Kodavali1,2, Nduka Amankulor1,2, Pascal O Zinn3,4,5. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 2. Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. zinnpo@upmc.edu. 4. Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. zinnpo@upmc.edu. 5. , 5150 Centre Ave., Suite 433, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA. zinnpo@upmc.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most fatal brain tumor in adults. Current survival rates of GBM remain below 2 years due to GBM's aggressive cellular migration and genetically driven treatment escape pathways. Despite our rapidly increasing understanding of GBM biology, earlier diagnoses, and refined surgical techniques, only moderate survival benefits have been achieved. Nonetheless, the pressing need for better survival rates has brought forward a multitude of newer therapeutic approaches and opened the door for potential personalization of these modalities in the near future. METHODS: We reviewed the published literature discussing the current state of knowledge regarding GBM biology and therapy and summarized the information that may point toward future personalized therapeutic strategies. RESULTS: Several novel modalities such as oncolytic viruses, targeted immune, and molecular therapies, and tumor treating fields have been introduced. To date, there is no single treatment modality for GBM, but rather a wide spectrum of combined modalities that address intratumoral cellular and genetic variabilities. While the current state of GBM research and clinical trial landscape may hold promise, current literature lacks any fruitful progress towards personalized GBM therapy. CONCLUSION: In this review, we are discussing our recent knowledge of the GBM genetic biologic landscape and the current advances in therapy, as well as providing a blueprint for an envisioned GBM management paradigm that should be personalized and adaptable to accommodate each patient's diverse genetic variations and therapy response/escape patterns.
INTRODUCTION:Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most fatal brain tumor in adults. Current survival rates of GBM remain below 2 years due to GBM's aggressive cellular migration and genetically driven treatment escape pathways. Despite our rapidly increasing understanding of GBM biology, earlier diagnoses, and refined surgical techniques, only moderate survival benefits have been achieved. Nonetheless, the pressing need for better survival rates has brought forward a multitude of newer therapeutic approaches and opened the door for potential personalization of these modalities in the near future. METHODS: We reviewed the published literature discussing the current state of knowledge regarding GBM biology and therapy and summarized the information that may point toward future personalized therapeutic strategies. RESULTS: Several novel modalities such as oncolytic viruses, targeted immune, and molecular therapies, and tumor treating fields have been introduced. To date, there is no single treatment modality for GBM, but rather a wide spectrum of combined modalities that address intratumoral cellular and genetic variabilities. While the current state of GBM research and clinical trial landscape may hold promise, current literature lacks any fruitful progress towards personalized GBM therapy. CONCLUSION: In this review, we are discussing our recent knowledge of the GBM genetic biologic landscape and the current advances in therapy, as well as providing a blueprint for an envisioned GBM management paradigm that should be personalized and adaptable to accommodate each patient's diverse genetic variations and therapy response/escape patterns.
Authors: Mark W Kieran; Liliana Goumnerova; Peter Manley; Susan N Chi; Karen J Marcus; Andrea G Manzanera; Maria Lucia Silva Polanco; Brian W Guzik; Estuardo Aguilar-Cordova; C Marcela Diaz-Montero; Arthur J DiPatri; Tadanori Tomita; Rishi Lulla; Lianne Greenspan; Laura K Aguilar; Stewart Goldman Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Jörg Wischhusen; Gundram Jung; Ivan Radovanovic; Christoph Beier; Joachim P Steinbach; Andreas Rimner; Huatao Huang; Jörg B Schulz; Hiroko Ohgaki; Adriano Aguzzi; Hans-Georg Rammensee; Michael Weller Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-05-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245