| Literature DB >> 32026554 |
Vanessa Y De La Rosa1, Joseph Hoover1,2, Ruofei Du3, Elizabeth Yakes Jimenez4, Debra MacKenzie1, Johnnye Lewis1.
Abstract
Proper nutrition during pregnancy is vital to maternal health and fetal development and may be challenging for Navajo Nation residents because access to affordable and healthy foods is limited. It has been several decades since reported diet quality during pregnancy was examined on Navajo Nation. We present the first study to estimate iodine intake and use the Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015) to assess maternal diet quality among pregnant women in the Navajo Birth Cohort Study (NBCS). Based on dietary intake data derived from food frequency questionnaires, overall estimated micronutrient intake has remained similar since the last assessment in 1981, with potential improvements evident for folate and niacin. A high proportion of women (>50%) had micronutrient intakes from dietary sources below the Estimated Average Requirements during pregnancy. The median urinary iodine concentration for NBCS women (90.8 μg/L; 95% CI [80, 103.5]) was less than adequate and lower than concentrations reported for pregnant women that participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2011 and 2014. Overall, average diet quality of NBCS women estimated using the HEI-2015 (62.4; 95% CI [60.7, 64.0]) was similar to that reported for women of child-bearing age and pregnant women in NHANES. Although, NBCS women had diets high in added sugar, with sugar-sweetened beverages as the primary contributors. Our study provides updated insights on maternal diet quality that can inform health and nutrition initiatives in Navajo communities emphasizing nutrition education and access to prenatal vitamins and calcium, iodine, and vitamin E dense foods.Entities:
Keywords: American Indian; Native American; Navajo; dietary assessment; fetal development; maternal nutrition; nutrition policy; pregnancy and nutrition
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32026554 PMCID: PMC7296825 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Matern Child Nutr ISSN: 1740-8695 Impact factor: 3.092
Navajo Birth Cohort demographics. Demographic characteristics comparing women with completed FFQ questionnaires and women without FFQ information nested within the Navajo Birth Cohort Study (NBCS)a
| FFQ | Non‐FFQ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic |
| Mean ( | Median (IQR) |
| Mean ( | Median (IQR) |
|
| Age at FFQ | 222 | 28.3 (6.4) | 27.6 (23.3–32.6) | 379 | 27.5 (5.8) | 26.9 (23.0‐31.9) | .144 |
| Gestational weeks at FFQ for those surveyed before delivery | 184 | 37.3 (2) | 37 (36–39) | ||||
| FFQ surveyed before delivery | |||||||
| Yes | 184 | 82.9 | |||||
| No | 38 | 17.1 | |||||
| Prenatal vitamin use | .145 | ||||||
| Yes | 167 | 75.2 | 213 | 56.2 | |||
| No | 1 | 0.5 | 7 | 1.8 | |||
| Not reported | 54 | 24.3 | 159 | 42 | |||
| Gravidity | 182 | 3 (1.9) | 3 (1.2–4.0) | 264 | 3.1 (2.1) | 3 (1–4) | .520 |
| Parity | 182 | 1.7 (1.6) | 1 (0–2) | 264 | 1.6 (1.6) | 1 (0–3) | .712 |
| Pre‐pregnancy weight (kg) | 184 | 76.7 (18.7) | 74.8 (64.1–88.6) | 250 | 78.1 (21.5) | 74.8 (64.1–87.9) | .469 |
| Term weight (kg) | 182 | 87.8 (18.4) | 87.2 (75.7–98.0) | 234 | 87.2 (18.8) | 85.1 (75.3–96.0) | .740 |
| Pre‐pregnancy BMI | .757 | ||||||
| <25 | 49 | 22.1 | 63 | 16.6 | |||
| 25–30 | 58 | 26.1 | 66 | 17.4 | |||
| >30 | 73 | 32.9 | 99 | 26.1 | |||
| Not reported | 42 | 18.9 | 151 | 39.8 | |||
| Gestational diabetes | .808 | ||||||
| Yes | 24 | 10.8 | 30 | 7.9 | |||
| No | 144 | 64.9 | 202 | 53.3 | |||
| Not reported | 54 | 24.3 | 147 | 38.8 | |||
| Eclampsia, preeclampsia, toxaemia during pregnancy, or pregnancy‐induced hypertension | .415 | ||||||
| Yes | 21 | 9.5 | 22 | 5.8 | |||
| No | 149 | 67.1 | 214 | 56.5 | |||
| Not reported | 52 | 23.4 | 143 | 37.7 | |||
| Marital status | .404 | ||||||
| Married | 183 | 82.4 | 301 | 79.4 | |||
| Unmarried | 37 | 16.7 | 75 | 19.8 | |||
| Not reported | 2 | 0.9 | 3 | 0.8 | |||
| Education | .058 | ||||||
| ≤High School | 112 | 50.5 | 229 | 60.4 | |||
| >High School | 100 | 45 | 145 | 38.3 | |||
| Not reported | 10 | 4.5 | 5 | 1.3 | |||
| Employment status | .759 | ||||||
| Unemployed | 150 | 67.6 | 262 | 69.1 | |||
| Employed | 72 | 32.4 | 117 | 30.9 | |||
| Annual household income | .857 | ||||||
| <$20,000 | 123 | 55.4 | 188 | 49.6 | |||
| $20,000–$39,999 | 35 | 15.8 | 50 | 13.2 | |||
| ≥40,000 | 33 | 14.9 | 44 | 11.6 | |||
| Not reported | 31 | 14 | 97 | 25.6 | |||
| Food assistance program | .563 | ||||||
| Yes | 164 | 73.9 | 290 | 76.5 | |||
| No | 55 | 24.8 | 85 | 22.4 | |||
| Not reported | 3 | 1.4 | 4 | 1.1 | |||
Abbreviations: BMI. body mass index; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation.
Continuous variables are expressed as means (SD) and median (IQR), and categorical data are expressed as percentage.
The category of “Not reported” was not included in statistical testing. For continuous variables, a two‐sample t test was done. For “Registration in WIC,” the test for comparison between FFQ and non‐FFQ was done by Fisher's exact test; for the remaining categorical variables, the comparison was done by χ 2 test.
Women, Infants, and Children, SNAP/food stamps, or food bank.
Figure 1Estimated dietary intake of micronutrients1 among Navajo Birth Cohort Study (NBCS) women. (a) Estimated nutrient intakes of NBCS cohort compared with a 1981 Navajo study. Mean nutrient intake values were used to calculate an intake ratio during pregnancy for NBCS cohort versus 1981 study by Butte et al. (NBCS/Butte). An intake ratio <1 indicates decrease in mean estimated intake. An intake ratio >1 indicates increased mean estimated intake. (b) Prevalence of inadequate intakes in the NBCS cohort for nutrients with an Estimated Average Requirement (EAR)2. (c) Sensitivity analysis based on daily prenatal vitamin intake by NBCS women. The multivitamin brand used by the majority of NBCS women was utilized to assess the percentage of NBCS women meeting the EAR for select micronutrients if a given proportion of NBCS women took this brand of multivitamin daily
Figure 2Median urinary iodine (median, interquartile range) for Navajo Birth Cohort Study (NBCS) and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) groups. The dotted horizontal line indicates minimum urinary iodine (UI) concentration (150 μg/L) for sufficiency during pregnancy as defined by the World Health Organization. Spot urines were used to measure UI concentrations in NBCS and NHANES groups
Healthy Eating Index (HEI‐2015) scores for NBCS cohort and subsets of NHANES dietary data
| Mean (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| HEI component | NBCSa | NHANES womenb | NHANES pregnant women |
| Total vegetables | 3.7 (3.4–4.0) | 3.4 (3.3, 3.5) | 3.9 (3.2, 4.7) |
| Greens and beans | 3.1 (2.5–3.7) | 3.4 (3.0, 3.7) | 4.0 (2.4, 5.0) |
| Total fruit | 5.0 (4.7–5.0) | 2.8 (2.6, 3.1) | 4.5 (2.5, 5.0) |
| Whole fruit | 5.0 (5.0–5.0) | 3.9 (3.6, 4.3) | 4.8 (3.1, 5.0) |
| Whole grains | 3.7 (3.4–4.1) | 2.5 (2.3, 2.7) | 2.6 (1.7, 3.5) |
| Dairy | 5.4 (4.8–6.1) | 6.2 (5.9, 6.4) | 6.2 (5.1, 7.3) |
| Total protein from food | 5.0 (5.0–5.0) | 5.0 (5.0, 5.0) | 5.0 (4.7, 5.0) |
| Seafood and plant protein | 3.0 (2.4–3.5) | 4.9 (4.5, 5.0) | 3.8 (2.3, 5.0) |
| Fatty acid ratio | 4.1 (3.7–4.5) | 4.5 (4.3, 4.7) | 4.2 (3.2, 5.3) |
| Sodium | 9.3 (8.9–6.9) | 4.0 (3.7, 4.3) | 3.4 (1.7, 5.1) |
| Refined grains | 7.3 (6.8–7.9) | 5.8 (5.5, 6.1) | 5.9 (4.7, 7.1) |
| Saturated fat | 6.4 (5.9–6.8) | 6.0 (5.8, 6.3) | 5.8 (4.6, 6.9) |
| Added sugar | 1.4 (0.8–2.1) | 5.8 (5.5, 6.0) | 6.0 (4.9, 7.1) |
| HEI‐2015 total score | 62.4 (60.7–64.0) | 58.2 (56.9, 59.4) | 60.2 (53.9, 65.1) |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; NBCS, Navajo Birth Cohort Study.
NBCS 2010–2016, women between the ages of 14 and 45 years, Harvard Service Food Frequency Questionnaire, N = 242.
NHANES 2011–2012 (N = 1,492) and NHANES 2013–2014 (N = 1,703), women between the ages of 14 and 45 years, 24‐hr dietary recall, Day 1.
NHANES 2011–2012 and NHANES 2013–2014 pregnant/lactating women between the ages of 14 and 45 years, 24‐hr dietary recall, Day 1, N = 105.
The 95% CIs of component score for NBCS and NHANES dataset of women aged 14–45 years do not overlap.
The 95% CIs of component score for NBCS and NHANES pregnant/lactating women aged 14–45 years do not overlap.
Figure 3Radar plot of Healthy Eating Index‐2015 individual component scores for Navajo Birth Cohort Study (NBCS) and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) groups. Each component point illustrates the percentage of total points received