| Literature DB >> 32025352 |
Ludovico Lucenti1, Kevin F Lutsky2,3, Christopher Jones2,3, Erick Kazarian4, Daniel Fletcher2,3, Pedro K Beredjiklian2,3.
Abstract
Background Scaphoid waist fractures are often treated using headless compression screws using dorsal or volar approaches. Objectives The purpose of this study is to compare differences in screw position using a volar (retrograde) or dorsal (antegrade) approach. Patients and Methods A total of 82 patients were retrospectively evaluated: 41 treated with a volar and 41 with a dorsal approach were selected. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed by three observers who rated screw location in the proximal pole, waist, and distal pole. Results Thirty-four patients (83%) in the antegrade group had central screw placement in the waist of the scaphoid in posteroanterior and lateral planes compared with 14 (34.9%) in the retrograde group ( p < 0.05). For the antegrade group, the screw was central in 217 of 246 zones (88.2%) compared with 127 of 246 (51.6%) in the retrograde group ( p < 0.05). Conclusions The dorsal antegrade approach appears to allow the surgeon to achieve central screw placement along all three scaphoid regions. Level of Evidence This is Level III study. © Thieme Medical Publishers.Entities:
Keywords: antegrade approach; retrograde approach; scaphoid screw fixation; scaphoid waist fracture
Year: 2019 PMID: 32025352 PMCID: PMC7000263 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698745
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Wrist Surg ISSN: 2163-3916