| Literature DB >> 33168036 |
Chen-Wei Yeh1,2, Cheng-En Hsu3,4, Wei-Chih Wang5, Yung-Cheng Chiu6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment is necessary for scaphoid nonunion. Open surgery with a combined volar and dorsal approach is thought to have poor functional outcomes and a prolonged recovery course. However, the detailed recovery course for this approach is rarely reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the recovery course and radiographic outcome for patients with scaphoid nonunion who underwent a combined volar bone grafting and dorsal antegrade headless screw approach.Entities:
Keywords: Bone grafting; Dorsal approach; Function recovery; Headless screw; Scaphoid nonunion; Volar approach
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33168036 PMCID: PMC7653748 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-02055-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Characteristics of the patients
| Number (%) | |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| M | 13 (72%) |
| F | 5 (28%) |
| Side | |
| R | 9 (50%) |
| L | 9 (50%) |
| Smoking history | |
| Y | 4 (22%) |
| N | 14 (78%) |
| Dominant | |
| R | 18 (100%) |
| L | 0 |
| Herbert | |
| D1 | 2 (11%) |
| D2 | 7 (39%) |
| D3 | 9 (50%) |
| D4 | 0 |
| Injury mechanism | |
| Traffic accident | 10 (56%) |
| Falling down | 8 (44%) |
Recovery course of functional scores in pre-operative and different post-operative, and radiographic parameters of scaphoid deformity
| Preoperative | Postoperative 3 months | Postoperative 6 months | Postoperative 9 months | Postoperative 12 months | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grip strengtha | 51% ± 20% | 50% ± 18% | 70% ± 16%* | 79% ± 10%* | 86% ± 12%* | < 0.05 |
| Motion arcb | 56% ± 10% | 48% ± 10% | 66% ± 12% | 78% ± 13%* | 86% ± 11%* | < 0.05 |
| DASH score | 32.8 ± 18.1 | 43.8 ± 21.2 | 30.9 ± 15.3 | 19.0 ± 14.2 | 12.4 ± 11.4* | < 0.05 |
| Mayo Wrist score | 42.5 ± 14.6 | 40.2 ± 15.5 | 63.6 ± 12.5* | 72.8 ± 12.7* | 84.4 ± 10.8* | < 0.05 |
| Scaphoid axial length | 24.8 ± 6.1 | 27.2 ± 5.3 | < 0.05 | |||
| Intrascaphoid angle | 43.7° ± 6.7° | 30° ± 6.4° | < 0.05 | |||
| Scapholunate angle | 61.6° ± 10.6° | 51.3° ± 9.9° | < 0.05 | |||
| Radiolunate angle | 25.8° ± 5.5° | 11.3° ± 3° | < 0.05 | |||
| Carpal height ratio | 46% ± 4% | 52% ± 2% | < 0.05 | |||
Grip strengtha (op/non-op) × 100%; motion arcb (op/non-op) × 100%
*P value, significance difference under Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Fig. 1Functional recovery course
Fig. 2Mayo Wrist score
Comparison of clinical outcomes and functional score of scaphoid nonunion treated with arthroscopic surgery and open surgery
| No. | Union time (weeks) | Union rates | Cast after surgery (weeks) | Follow-up time (months) | Motion arcs to non-operative side | Strength to non-operative side | Mayo Wrist score (excellent and good) | DASH score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim JP [ | 28 | 11 | 86% | 4-6 | 24 | Unchanged | 89% | 44 to 13 | 23 |
| Kang [ | 33 | NDa | 97% | 6 | 24 | 100 to 109° (opc) | 35 to 50 kg (op c) | 56 to 89 | 4 |
| Delgado [ | 13 | 7 | 93% | 2 | 17.3 | 153.6 to 166.1° (opc) | NDa | NDa | 8 |
| Lee [ | 27 | 10 | 96.3% | 10 | 18 | 90.1% | 89.6% | 18/27 (67%) | NDa |
| Liu [ | 25 | 12 | 100% | 6.6 | 21 | 94.2% | NDa | 95.2 (post-operative) | NDa |
| Oh-A* [ | 28 | NDa | 96.4% | 2 | 24 | 99.8 to 108° (opc) | 81.4% | 25/28 (89%) | 5.6 |
| Oh-O# [ | 34 | NDa | 97.1% | 2 | 24 | 97.5 to 103.2° (opc) | 86.1% | 28/34 (82%) | 6.8 |
| Mani [ | 45 | 13.15 | 93% | 6 | 12 | 80% | 101% | 40/45 (89%) | NDa |
| Dustmann [ | 52 | NDa | 84.6% | 12 | 8.6 | 91% | 93% | 91.2 (post-operative) | 9.2 |
| Han [ | 30 | 12.5 | 89% | 6 | 37.5 | 86% | 88% | 28/30 (93%) | ND1 |
| Kim JK [ | 35 | 12.9 | 97% | 6-8 | 12 | NSDb | 87% | NDa | 9.5 |
| Kim J [ | 24 | 12 | 92% | 6 | 24 | 56% | 32 to 38 kg (opc) | 52 to 70 | NDa |
A* arthroscopy cancellous bone graft; O# open volar cancellous bone graft; NDa no data; NSDb no significant difference; opc operative
Comparison of carpal alignment correction in arthroscopic and open bone grafting in the literature
| SALa (mm) | LISAb (°) | SLAc (°) | RLAd (°) | CHRe | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pref | Postg | Pref | Postg | Pref | Postg | Pref | Postg | Pref | Postg | |
| Kim JP [ | 26.5 | 27.3 | 42.8 | 33.5 | 59.3 | 51.6 | NSDh | |||
| Delgado [ | 67.7 | 47 | 30.8 | 4 | ||||||
| Oh-A* [ | 33 | 26.5 | 53.3 | 45.9 | 7.5 | 5.2 | 0.64 | 0.59 | ||
| Oh-O# [ | 39.2 | 22.6 | 58.9 | 46.8 | 8.8 | 4.8 | 0.65 | 0.55 | ||
| Mani [ | 49.6 | 36.2 | 0.66 | 0.6 | ||||||
| Dustmann [ | 65 | 55 | ||||||||
| Han [ | 22 | 26 | 40 | 32 | 61 | 56 | ||||
| Kim JK [ | 55 | 35 | 11.5 | 5.26 | 0.72 | 0.65 | ||||
| Kim J [ | 62 | 56 | 0.6 | 0.57 | ||||||
A* arthroscopy cancellous bone graft; O# open volar cancellous bone graft; SALa scaphoid axial length; LISAb lateral intrascaphoid angle; SLAc, scapholunate angle; RLAd radiolunate angle; CHRe, carpal height ratio; Pref preoperative degree; Postg postoperative degree; NSDh no significant difference