Literature DB >> 32025136

Can preoperative magnetic resonance arthrography accurately predict intraoperative hip labral thickness?

Matthew J Hartwell1, Ryan S Selley1, Steven R Dayton1, Sarah H Ishamuddin1, Ksheeraja Ravi1, Michael A Terry1, Vehniah K Tjong1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is limited literature investigating the reliability of magnetic resonance-based assessments of labral size. The goal of this study was to validate the reliability of magnetic resonance arthrography-based labral size measurements with intra-operative arthroscopic measurements.
METHODS: Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative magnetic resonance arthrograms were used to determine labral size at the anterior-superior portion (zone 2), mid-superior portion (zone 3), and posterior-superior portion (zone 4). Intra-operative labral widths were measured at the same anatomical zones of the acetabulum using an arthroscopic probe. Mean labral size was determined for each location and a Pearson correlation was used to determine the correlation between imaging-based measurements and intra-operative measurements.
RESULTS: 117 patients were enrolled with 70% being female, an average age of 39.1 ± 13.3, and an average body mass index was 26.5 ± 5.4. The average labral sizes based on intraoperative measurements were 6.85 mm in zone 2, 7.45 mm in zone 3, and 7.29 mm in zone 4. The average labral sizes based on MRA were 6.95 mm in zone 2, 7.24 mm in zone 3, and 6.71 mm in zone 4. There was a poor correlation between MRA and intraoperative measurements in zones 2 and 3 (zone 2: R = 0.171, p = 0.065; zone 3: R = 0.335, p = 0.00022) and no correlation in zone 4 (R = -0.22, p = 0.82).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a poor correlation in labral measurements between magnetic resonance arthrogram imaging and intraoperative measurements, suggesting that this imaging modality may be insufficient in providing accurate measurements of labral size.
© 2020 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip labrum size; Intraoperative measurements; MRA measurement accuracy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32025136      PMCID: PMC6997667          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  14 in total

1.  A geographic zone method to describe intra-articular pathology in hip arthroscopy: cadaveric study and preliminary report.

Authors:  Victor M Ilizaliturri; J W Thomas Byrd; Thomas G Sampson; Carlos A Guanche; Marc J Philippon; Bryan T Kelly; Michael Dienst; Rodrigo Mardones; Paul Shonnard; Christopher M Larson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Crawford; Gayle Walley; Stephen Bridgman; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2007-09-03       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  The acetabular labrum seal: a poroelastic finite element model.

Authors:  S J Ferguson; J T Bryant; R Ganz; K Ito
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Using pre-operative MRI to predict intraoperative hamstring graft size for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jeff Leiter; Mohamed Elkurbo; Sheila McRae; James Chiu; Warren Froese; Peter MacDonald
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Acetabular labrum in hip dysplasia evaluated by radial magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T Kubo; M Horii; J Yamaguchi; S Inoue; M Fujioka; K Ueshima; Y Hirasawa
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging cross-sectional area for the measurement of hamstring autograft diameter for reconstruction of the adolescent anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Brent A Bickel; T Ty Fowler; John G Mowbray; Brent Adler; Kevin Klingele; Gary Phillips
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Comparison of arthroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging findings in osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Authors:  Sooho Bae; Hyeon Kyeong Lee; Kyunghee Lee; Sanghyeok Lim; Nae-Jung Rim; Jin-Su Kim; Jaeho Cho
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.827

8.  Preoperative Measurement of Cartilage Defects by MRI Underestimates Lesion Size.

Authors:  Andreas H Gomoll; Hiroshi Yoshioka; Atsuya Watanabe; John C Dunn; Tom Minas
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Lateral acetabular labral length is inversely related to acetabular coverage as measured by lateral center edge angle of Wiberg.

Authors:  Brian D Petersen; Bryan Wolf; Jeffrey R Lambert; Carolyn W Clayton; Deborah H Glueck; Mary Kristen Jesse; Omer Mei-Dan
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2016-02-29

10.  Lesion Size Measured on MRI Does Not Accurately Reflect Arthroscopic Measurement in Talar Osteochondral Lesions.

Authors:  Youichi Yasui; Charles P Hannon; Ethan J Fraser; Jakob Ackermann; Lorraine Boakye; Keir A Ross; Gavin L Duke; Yoshiharu Shimozono; John G Kennedy
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-02-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Intraoperative Labral Width at the 9-O'clock and 12-O'clock Positions in Primary Hip Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Spencer M Comfort; Joseph J Ruzbarsky; Justin E Ernat; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.