Literature DB >> 23199853

Comparison of arthroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging findings in osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Sooho Bae1, Hyeon Kyeong Lee, Kyunghee Lee, Sanghyeok Lim, Nae-Jung Rim, Jin-Su Kim, Jaeho Cho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used for diagnosing osteochondral lesions in the talus. The purpose of this study was to directly compare the MRI with the arthroscopic findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 42 ankles were retrospectively reviewed during a period of 67 months. The osteochondral lesions were evaluated by both MRI (0, normal; 1, subchondral trabecular compression and marrow edema; 2A, subchondral cyst; 2B incomplete separation fragment; 3, unattached, nondisplaced fragment with synovial fluid surrounding it; 4, displaced fragment) and arthroscopy (A, smooth and intact, but soft and ballottable cartilage; B, rough surfaces; C, fibrillations or fissures; D, flap present or bone exposed; E, loose, undisplaced fragment; F, displaced fragment). Arthroscopic grade A was considered to be equivalent to MR grade 1, B and C to MR grade 2A, D to 2B, E to 3, and F to 4.
RESULTS: Of the 44 lesions in 42 ankles, 29 lesions marked the same grade on both MRI and arthroscopy (65.9%). Nine lesions were upgraded on arthroscopy (20.5%), and six were downgraded (13.6%). MR grade 3 lesions showed the best correlation (83.3%) and MR grade 1 and 2B lesions showed the worst (50.0 and 55.6 %). Arthroscopic grade A and F showed good correlation (80 and 100%). Grade C and E showed poor (25.0%) and intermediate correlation (66.7%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The MRI grading of osteochondral lesions in the talus was useful and showed a fairly good correlation with arthroscopic classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23199853     DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2012.1058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Arthroscopically assisted treatment of ankle fractures].

Authors:  M Braunstein; S F Baumbach; W Böcker; W Mutschler; H Polzer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Microfracture provides better clinical results than debridement in the treatment of acute talar osteochondral lesions using arthroscopic assisted fixation of acute ankle fractures.

Authors:  Altuğ Duramaz; Emre Baca
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Can preoperative magnetic resonance arthrography accurately predict intraoperative hip labral thickness?

Authors:  Matthew J Hartwell; Ryan S Selley; Steven R Dayton; Sarah H Ishamuddin; Ksheeraja Ravi; Michael A Terry; Vehniah K Tjong
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-21

4.  The value of arthroscopy in the treatment of complex ankle fractures - a protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mareen Braunstein; Sebastian F Baumbach; Markus Regauer; Wolfgang Böcker; Hans Polzer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Diagnosis and treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle: current concepts.

Authors:  Marcelo Pires Prado; John G Kennedy; Fernando Raduan; Caio Nery
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2016-08-17

6.  Diagnostic Value of CT Arthrography for Evaluation of Osteochondral Lesions at the Ankle.

Authors:  Jan S Kirschke; Sepp Braun; Thomas Baum; Christian Holwein; Christoph Schaeffeler; Andreas B Imhoff; Ernst J Rummeny; Klaus Woertler; Pia M Jungmann
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Lesion Size Measured on MRI Does Not Accurately Reflect Arthroscopic Measurement in Talar Osteochondral Lesions.

Authors:  Youichi Yasui; Charles P Hannon; Ethan J Fraser; Jakob Ackermann; Lorraine Boakye; Keir A Ross; Gavin L Duke; Yoshiharu Shimozono; John G Kennedy
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-02-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.