Literature DB >> 32024644

One small step for man, one giant leap for men's health: a meta-analysis of behaviour change interventions to increase men's physical activity.

Paul Sharp1, John C Spence2, Joan L Bottorff3,4, John L Oliffe5, Kate Hunt6, Mathew Vis-Dunbar7, Cristina M Caperchione8,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of behaviour change interventions on men's physical activity (postintervention), sustained change in physical activity behaviour (≥12 months postintervention) and to identify variations in effects due to potential moderating variables (eg, theoretical underpinning, gender-tailored, contact frequency).
DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Pooled effect size (Cohen's d) was calculated assuming a random-effects model. Homogeneity and subsequent exploratory moderator analyses were assessed using Q, T2 and I2. DATA SOURCES: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, SportDiscus and Web of Science to April 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTED STUDIES: Randomised control trials of behaviour change interventions in men (≥18 years) where physical activity was an outcome and data were from men-only studies or disaggregated by sex.
RESULTS: Twenty-six articles described 24 eligible studies. The overall mean intervention effect on men's physical activity was 0.35 (SE=0.05; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.45; p<0.001). This effect size is consistent with an increase of approximately 97 min of total physical activity per week or 980 steps per day. Intervention moderators associated with greater increases in physical activity included objective physical activity outcome measures, a gender-tailored design, use of a theoretical framework, shorter length programmes (≤12 weeks), using four or more types of behaviour change techniques and frequent contact with participants (≥1 contact per week). 12 studies included additional follow-up assessments (≥12 months postintervention) and the overall mean effect was 0.32 (SE=0.09; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.48; p<0.001) for that sustained increase in physical activity.
SUMMARY: Behaviour change interventions targeting men's physical activity can be effective. Moderator analyses are preliminary and suggest research directions. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intervention; male; meta-analysis; physical activity; randomised controlled trial

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32024644     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  5 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Adult Health Promotion Interventions Delivered Through Professional Sport: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Emma S George; Aymen El Masri; Dominika Kwasnicka; Alannah Romeo; Sarah Cavallin; Andrew Bennie; Gregory S Kolt; Justin M Guagliano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  Sedentary Behaviour Intervention as a Personalised Secondary Prevention Strategy (SIT LESS) for patients with coronary artery disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation: rationale and design of the SIT LESS randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  B M A van Bakel; S H Kroesen; A Günal; A Scheepmaker; W R M Aengevaeren; F F Willems; R Wondergem; M F Pisters; J Dam; A M Janssen; M de Bruin; M T E Hopman; D H J Thijssen; T M H Eijsvogels
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2022-05-24

Review 3.  A systematic review examining socioeconomic factors in trials of interventions for men that report weight as an outcome.

Authors:  Matthew D McDonald; Kate Hunt; Hamsini Sivaramakrishnan; Joanna Moullin; Alison Avenell; Deborah A Kerr; Jack M Birch; Nikos Ntoumanis; Eleanor Quested
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 10.867

4.  Female partner experiences of prostate cancer patients' engagement with a community-based football intervention: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Julie Midtgaard; Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen; Mette Rørth; Malene Kronborg; Eik D Bjerre; John L Oliffe
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  "People say men don't talk, well that's bullshit": A focus group study exploring challenges and opportunities for men's mental health promotion.

Authors:  Paul Sharp; Joan L Bottorff; Simon Rice; John L Oliffe; Nico Schulenkorf; Franco Impellizzeri; Cristina M Caperchione
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.