| Literature DB >> 32024483 |
Jiali Zhou1,2,3, Jinghui Lu4, Chen Gao1,2, Jingjing Zeng5, Changyu Zhou1,2, Xiaobo Lai1,2, Wenli Cai6, Maosheng Xu7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of wavelet-transformed radiomic MRI in predicting the pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Pathological complete response; Radiomics
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32024483 PMCID: PMC7003343 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6523-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the patient selection in the study
Fig. 2Radiomic MRI prediction of pathological complete response (pCR)
Clinical and pathological data in the study
| pCR | Non-pCR | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 17 | 38 | N/A |
| Age(y) | |||
| Median(range) | 50 (37–70) | 48 (25–68) | N/A |
| Mean ± SD | 50.7 ± 9.4 | 49.5 ± 10.4 | 0.676 |
| Enhancement Type, No. (%) | 0.506 | ||
| Masslike | 11 (64.7) | 23 (60.5) | |
| Non-masslike | 6 (35.3) | 15 (39.5) | |
| Max-D(cm)* | |||
| Median(range) | 2.6 (2.3–3.7) | 4.2 (3.1–5.4) | N/A |
| Mean ± SD | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 4.3 ± 1.9 | 0.002 |
| Subtype, No. (%) | 0.493 | ||
| Luminal A | 5 (29.4) | 17 (44.7) | |
| Luminal B | 2 (11.8) | 7 (18.4) | |
| Her-2 | 5 (29.4) | 8 (21.1) | |
| TNBC | 5 (29.4) | 6 (15.8) | |
| Regimen, No. (%) | 0.412 | ||
| EC + Taxol | 4 (23.5) | 14 (36.8) | |
| FEC + Taxol | 7 (41.2) | 15 (39.5) | |
| AC+ Taxol | 2 (11.8) | 6 (15.8) | |
| Others | 4 (23.5) | 3 (7.9) | |
NOTE. P-values were calculated by T-test or Mann-Whitney U test for Age, Max-D, from Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for Enhancement type, Subtype, Regimen
Abbreviations: Max-D Maximum- diameter, Her-2 Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, TNBC Triple negative breast cancer, E epirubicin; C cyclophosphamide, Taxol paclitaxel; F 5-fluoroucil. A doxorubicin. N/A Not available
Fig. 3Segmentation of breast lesions on CE-MRI. Images a-b show the right invasive breast cancer that was non-pCR after NAC. Images c-d show the left invasive breast cancer that was pCR after NAC. a, c Segmentation of breast lesions on CE-MRI. b, d 3D imaging of VOIs
Textures and performance (AUC, Accuracy, Sensitivity and Specificity) of six RF models
| RF Models | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | V | VI | |
| Features | Volumetric | Volumetric + Peripheral | Wavelet | Volumetric + Wavelet | Peripheral + Wavelet | Volumetric + Peripheral + Wavelet |
| Selected Features | GLZSM_salgle GLCM_homo1 GLCM_diffEntro GLCM_dissimilar SHAPE_surfaceArea | GLZSM_salgle GLCM_homo1 GLCM_diffEntro GLCM_dissimilar Bndry_RL_rln Bndry_GLZSM_salgle Bndry_GLCM_contrast SHAPE_surfaceArea | LHH_GLZSM_zp LLH_GLCM_infoCorr1 HHH_GLCM_correlation | GLZSM_salgle GLCM_homo1 GLCM_diffEntro GLCM_dissimilar HHH_GLCM_correlation LHH_GLZSM_zp LLH_GLCM_infoCorr1 SHAPE_surfaceArea | Bndry_RL_rln Bndry_GLZSM_salgle Bndry_GLCM_contrast HHH_GLCM_correlation LHH_GLZSM_zp LLH_GLCM_infoCorr1 | SHAPE_surfaceArea GLZSM_salgle GLCM_homo1 GLCM_diffEntro GLCM_dissimilar Bndry_RL_rln Bndry_GLZSM_salgle Bndry_GLCM_contrast HHH_GLCM_correlation LHH_GLZSM_zp LLH_GLCM_infoCorr1 |
| AUC (mean ± SD) | 0.816 ± 0.033 | 0.823 ± 0.020 | 0.888 ± 0.025 | 0.876 ± 0.015 | 0.885 ± 0.030 | 0.874 ± 0.019 |
| Accuracy (mean ± SD) | 0.747 ± 0.022 | 0.751 ± 0.0150 | 0.810 ± 0.030 | 0.781 ± 0.028 | 0.797 ± 0.032 | 0.787 ± 0.024 |
| Sensitivity (mean ± SD) | 0.676 ± 0.043 | 0.684 ± 0.043 | 0.762 ± 0.035 | 0.730 ± 0.049 | 0.770 ± 0.034 | 0.727 ± 0.045 |
| Specificity (mean ± SD) | 0.812 ± 0.023 | 0.798 ± 0.021 | 0.845 ± 0.031 | 0.818 ± 0.037 | 0.818 ± 0.047 | 0.830 ± 0.035 |
NOTE: Bndry_GLZSM_salgle, Bndry_GLCM_contrast and Bndry_RL_rln were peripheral texture features
Fig. 4Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the six RF models: a Model I: volumetric textures, b Model II: volumetric + peripheral textures, c Model III: wavelet textures, d Model IV: volumetric + wavelet textures, e Model V: peripheral + wavelet textures, and f Model VI: volumetric + peripheral + wavelet textures
Fig. 5Boxplots of the prediction performance (AUC, area under ROC curve) of six radiomics models
Comparison of p-values of AUCs between 6 models
| Models | I | II | III | IV | V | VI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | N/A | 0.985 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| II | N/A | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.001 | |
| III | N/A | 0.891 | 1.000 | 0.809 | ||
| IV | N/A | 0.968 | 1.000 | |||
| V | N/A | 0.924 | ||||
| VI | N/A |
NOTE: P-values are calculated from the T-test