| Literature DB >> 32023945 |
Liu Yang1, Hai Jiang1, Song Wang1, Ajiao Hou1, Wenjing Man1, Jiaxu Zhang1, Xinyue Guo1, Bingyou Yang1, Haixue Kuang1, Qiuhong Wang1,2.
Abstract
Farfarae Flos (FF) is the dried flower bud of Tussilago farfara L, which has antitussive, expectorant, and anti-inflammatory effects. However, little research on the main active composition of FF has been reported. The purpose of this study is to find the main active compounds responsible for the three pharmacological effects (i.e., antitussive, expectorant, and anti-inflammatory effects) of Farfarae Flos, based on the spectrum-effect relationship combined with chemometrics. First, this study uses the UPLC-QDA method to establish the chromatography fingerprint of Farfarae Flos, which is combined with chemometrics to analyze 18 batches of samples. Then, we study the antitussive, expectorant, and anti-inflammatory effects of Farfarae Flos. Finally, the spectrum-effect relationship between the fingerprint and the three pharmacological effects are studied by grey correlation analysis and partial least squares regression. The results show that four, four, and three main active constituents were found for the antitussive, expectorant, and anti-inflammatory pharmacological effects, respectively. In conclusion, we found the main active compounds corresponding to the main pharmacodynamic effects of Farfarae Flos. To our knowledge, this is the first time that spectrum-effect relationships in FF have been established using both raw and processed samples, which provides an experimental basis for further studies on the pharmacodynamic material basis of Farfarae Flos, as well as providing reference for the comprehensive evaluation of Farfarae Flos quality and the development of substitute resources.Entities:
Keywords: chemometrics; grey relational analysis; main active compositions; partial least squares regression; raw and processed Farfarae Flos; spectrum–effect relationship
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32023945 PMCID: PMC7037795 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25030620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Compounds, retention times, Precursor (m/z), and chemical structures of the constituents studied.
| Peak | Compound | Retention Time (Min) | Precursor ( | Adduct | Structure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | 3-CQA (Chlorogenic acid) | 3.47 | 376.98 | [M + Na]+ |
|
| P2 | Unknown | 10.48 | 366.35 | Unknown | Unknown |
| P3 | Rutin | 11.33 | 633.15 | [M + Na]+ |
|
| P4 | Unknown | 11.56 | 487.28 | Unknown | Unknown |
| P5 | 3,5-CQA | 12.64 | 539.21 | [M + Na]+ |
|
| P6 | 3,4-CQA | 12.98 | 538.92 | [M + Na]+ |
|
| P7 | 4,5-CQA (4,5-Dicaffeoylquinic acid) | 14.04 | 538.99 | [M + Na]+ |
|
| P8 | Kaempferol | 17.97 | 286.90 | [M + H]+ |
|
| P9 | Unknown | 27.10 | 453.21 | Unknown | Unknown |
| P10 | Unknown | 27.73 | 413.15 | Unknown | Unknown |
| P11 | Unknown | 28.58 | 471.08 | Unknown | Unknown |
| P12 | Unknown | 36.94 | 453.14 | Unknown | Unknown |
| P13 | Unknown | 39.82 | 513.32 | Unknown | Unknown |
| P14 | Unknown | 47.60 | 453.36 | Unknown | Unknown |
Figure 1Chromatography fingerprint of 18 batches of samples.
Results of relative retention times and relative peak areas of precision, repeatability, and stability.
| Peak No. | RRT | R.S.D. (%) | RPA | R.S.D. (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision | Repeatability | Stability | Precision | Repeatability | Stability | |||
| 1 | 1.000 | 0.19 | 1.14 | 0.92 | 1.000 | 3.55 | 2.85 | 3.95 |
| 2 | 1.094 | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.99 | 0.268 | 3.85 | 3.61 | 2.90 |
| 3 | 1.193 | 0.33 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.918 | 3.53 | 3.64 | 4.23 |
| 4 | 1.216 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.55 | 1.088 | 4.32 | 3.01 | 2.91 |
| 5 | 1.306 | 0.28 | 1.62 | 0.86 | 0.776 | 3.74 | 3.55 | 4.46 |
| 6 | 1.668 | 1.13 | 0.52 | 0.92 | 0.825 | 4.33 | 3.05 | 5.02 |
| 7 | 1.752 | 0.74 | 0.46 | 0.91 | 0.086 | 4.76 | 3.92 | 4.46 |
| 8 | 1.816 | 0.68 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 0.152 | 4.28 | 3.60 | 4.08 |
| 9 | 2.511 | 0.44 | 0.67 | 0.87 | 0.535 | 2.53 | 2.60 | 3.73 |
| 10 | 2.593 | 0.57 | 1.33 | 1.03 | 2.100 | 2.44 | 3.36 | 3.77 |
| 11 | 2.671 | 0.60 | 0.73 | 0.88 | 2.132 | 2.04 | 3.11 | 3.92 |
| 12 | 3.353 | 1.05 | 1.11 | 0.82 | 1.744 | 4.41 | 4.62 | 3.92 |
| 13 | 3.654 | 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.69 | 6.995 | 3.81 | 2.76 | 2.55 |
| 14 | 4.358 | 0.45 | 0.37 | 1.02 | 0.922 | 2.48 | 2.60 | 4.48 |
Similarity analysis of 18 Batches of Farfarae Flos (FF) Samples.
| NO. | SA | NO. | SA |
|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | 0.98 | S10 | 0.91 |
| M2 | 0.90 | S11 | 0.79 |
| M3 | 0.92 | S12 | 0.98 |
| M4 | 0.94 | S13 | 0.92 |
| M5 | 0.90 | S14 | 0.87 |
| M6 | 0.93 | S15 | 0.94 |
| M7 | 0.92 | S16 | 0.74 |
| S8 | 0.93 | S17 | 0.85 |
| S9 | 0.92 | S18 | 0.90 |
Figure 2HCA results for 18 batches of samples.
Figure 3Principal component analysis (PCA) results for the 18 batches of samples.
Renumbering of the 10 screened FF sample batches.
| Previous Number | Renumber | Previous Number | Renumber |
|---|---|---|---|
| S8 | X1 | S15 | X6 |
| S9 | X2 | M1 | Y1 |
| S10 | X3 | M3 | Y2 |
| S12 | X4 | M5 | Y3 |
| S14 | X5 | M6 | Y4 |
Figure 4(A) Results of antitussive activity test, (B) results of expectorant activity test, and (C) results of anti-inflammatory activity test (t-test; * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01). The positive drug groups are pentoxyverine, ammonium chloride, and dexamethasone, respectively. X1–X6: raw sample group, Y1–Y4: processed sample group.
Grey relational analysis (GRA) results of antitussive, expectorant, anti-inflammatory experiments.
| Antitussive Effect | Expectorant Effect | Anti-Inflammatory Effect | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Order | Peak | Correlation Coefficient | Peak | Correlation Coefficient | Peak | Correlation Coefficient |
| 1 | P5 | 0.6945 | P14 | 0.7648 | P14 | 0.7307 |
| 2 | P8 | 0.6850 | P9 | 0.7481 | P9 | 0.6844 |
| 3 | P12 | 0.6821 | P12 | 0.7361 | P2 | 0.6506 |
| 4 | P7 | 0.6818 | P10 | 0.7315 | P13 | 0.6495 |
| 5 | P14 | 0.6807 | P11 | 0.7267 | P10 | 0.6482 |
| 6 | P10 | 0.6645 | P4 | 0.7261 | P11 | 0.6426 |
| 7 | P9 | 0.6644 | P3 | 0.7130 | P12 | 0.6393 |
| 8 | P3 | 0.6611 | P2 | 0.7044 | P3 | 0.6386 |
| 9 | P4 | 0.6557 | P7 | 0.7014 | P4 | 0.6364 |
| 10 | P11 | 0.6473 | P13 | 0.6919 | P1 | 0.6337 |
| 11 | P13 | 0.6408 | P6 | 0.6868 | P8 | 0.6337 |
| 12 | P6 | 0.6380 | P1 | 0.6791 | P6 | 0.6254 |
| 13 | P2 | 0.6273 | P5 | 0.6748 | P5 | 0.6228 |
| 14 | P1 | 0.6234 | P8 | 0.6550 | P7 | 0.6184 |
Figure 5The analysis of three pharmacological experiments by PLSR: PLS linear regression (A1, B1, C1), regression coefficients (A2, B2, C2), and the VIP (A3, B3, C3) of the 14 compounds analyzed.
Origin of the 18 batches of Farfarae Flos samples.
| NO. | Origin | NO. | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | Yunnan | S10 | Gansu |
| M2 | Gansu | S11 | Hubei |
| M3 | Sichuan | S12 | Hubei |
| M4 | Jiangxi | S13 | Hubei |
| M5 | Heilongjiang | S14 | Gansu |
| M6 | Hebei | S15 | Gansu |
| M7 | Hebei | S16 | Hebei |
| S8 | Anhui | S17 | Heilongjiang |
| S9 | Anhui | S18 | Anhui |