| Literature DB >> 32023827 |
Maria Grazia Alaimo1, Daniela Varrica1.
Abstract
Urban areas are characterized by numerous pollutants emitted by anthropic sources both in the form of solid and gaseous particulates. Biomonitoring is an easy, economical, and accessible approach for the determination of atmospheric pollutants. In this study, we used the leaves of Ficus macrophylla Desf. ex Pers., collected in the city of Palermo (Italy), to determine major and trace elements. Geogenic elements exhibited the highest concentrations, making up 99% of the weight of the analyzed elements (Ca, K, Mg, P, S, Na, Fe, and Al); they range 21,400 (Ca) to 122 µg g-1 (Al). The remaining elements showed median concentrations in the range 47.5-0.05 µg g-1 in the following order of abundance: Sr > Cu > Mn > Zn > Br > Rb > Ba > Pb > Cr > Sb > As > Mo = Sc. Cluster analysis, with Spearman's coefficient to measure sample similarity, identified five main groups, namely, three clusters related to the geogenic background and marine spray; one cluster linked to elements essential to plants, and a final group attributed to the influence of traffic emissions. Calculated enrichment factors (EF) showed that the enrichments found for P and K were linked to plant metabolism; Na and Mg confirmed the role of sea spray; Cu and Zn underlined the contribution linked to anthropic processes and the role of micronutrients in plants.. As, Cr, and Mo had EF values ranging from 10 and 20, and Sb had EF > 90. From geochemical distribution maps of As, Cr, Mo, and Sb it was observed that metal and metalloid concentrations were higher in urban areas and immediately decreased as one moved away from these areas. Local pollution sources play a great role in trace element concentrations in airborne particulate matter. The present study confirms that Ficus macrophylla leaves are suitable for screening an urban environment to identify concentrations of inorganic chemicals, since they have high tolerance to pollution.Entities:
Keywords: Ficus macrophylla Desf. ex Pers. leaves; air quality; biogeochemistry; environmental geochemistry; trace elements
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32023827 PMCID: PMC7038082 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17030881
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Study area in relation to sampling site location of Ficus macrophylla. Red indicates samples collected from the long main urban road; blue indicates samples collected from city gardens.
Sampling sites and location descriptions. Legend: Urb, samples collected from the long main urban road; CG, samples collected from city gardens.
| Samples | Location | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| FC1 | Urb | urban road exposed to heavy traffic, composed of cars and urban buses |
| FC2 | Urb | urban road characterized by lower traffic density |
| FC3 | Urb | large square exposed to traffic mainly composed of cars and urban buses |
| FC4 | Urb | urban road characterized by lower traffic density |
| FC5 | Urb | urban road characterized by lower traffic density |
| FC6 | Urb | urban road characterized by lower traffic density |
| FC7 | Urb | urban road characterized by lower traffic density |
| FC8 | Urb | urban road exposed to medium amount of traffic of cars |
| FC9 | Urb | urban road exposed to medium amount of traffic of cars |
| FC10 | Urb | urban road exposed to medium amount of traffic of cars |
| FC11 | Urb | urban road exposed to medium amount of traffic of cars |
| FC12 | Urb | urban road exposed to heavy traffic, composed of cars, heavy-duty vehicles and urban and extra-urban buses |
| FC13 | Urb | urban road exposed to heavy traffic, composed of cars and urban buses |
| FC14 | Urb | urban road exposed to high traffic flow, composed of cars, heavy-duty vehicles and urban and extra-urban buses |
| FC15 | Urb | urban road exposed to heavy traffic, composed of cars and urban and extra-urban buses |
| FC16 | Urb | urban road exposed to medium amount of traffic of cars |
| FC17 | Urb | urban road exposed to medium amount of traffic of cars |
| FC18 | Urb | urban road exposed to high traffic flow, composed of cars, heavy-duty vehicles and urban buses |
| FC19 | Urb | urban road exposed to medium amount of traffic of cars |
| FC20 | Urb | urban road exposed to high traffic flow, composed of cars, heavy-duty vehicles and urban and extra-urban buses |
| FC21 | Urb | a little square in front of the railway station, exposed to heavy traffic, composed of cars and urban and extra-urban buses |
| FC22 | Urb | urban road exposed to heavy traffic, composed of cars and urban buses |
| FC23 | Urb | large square in front of the sea exposed to heavy traffic by cars, urban and extra-urban buses |
| FC24 | Urb | urban road exposed to heavy traffic composed of cars, urban and extra-urban buses |
| FC25 | Urb | urban road exposed to high traffic flow, composed of cars, heavy-duty vehicles and urban and extra-urban buses |
| FC26 | CG | urban garden without any direct influence of vehicular traffic |
| FC27 | CG | urban garden without any direct influence of vehicular traffic |
| FC28 | CG | urban garden without any direct influence of vehicular traffic |
| FC29 | CG | urban garden without any direct influence of vehicular traffic |
| FC30 | CG | urban garden without any direct influence of vehicular traffic |
| FC31 | CG | urban garden without any direct influence of vehicular traffic |
| FC32 | CG | urban garden without any direct influence of vehicular traffic |
| FC33 | CG | urban garden without any direct influence of vehicular traffic |
| FC34 | CG | urban garden without any direct influence of vehicular traffic |
| FC35 | CG | urban garden without any direct influence of vehicular traffic |
| FC36 | CG | urban garden without any direct influence of vehicular traffic |
| FC37 | CG | urban garden without any direct influence of vehicular traffic |
| FC38 | CG | urban garden without any direct influence of vehicular traffic |
| FC39 | CG | urban garden without any direct influence of vehicular traffic |
Basic statistical parameters for a total of 39 Ficus macrophylla leaf samples. Data given in μg g−1 (dry biomass). Legend: N, number of analyzed samples; Std, standard deviation; MAD, median absolute deviation.
| N | Mean ± Std | Median | Minimum | Maximum | Skewness | Kurtosis | MAD | N | URB | N | CG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | 39 | 21,506 ± 4195 | 21,400 | 9850 | 30,350 | −0.27 | 0.85 | 2700 | 25 | 21,748 ± 3733 | 14 | 21,075 ± 5039 |
| K | 39 | 17,897 ± 4134 | 17,800 | 10,100 | 26,700 | 0.19 | −0.64 | 3150 | 25 | 17,220 ± 3582 | 14 | 19,107 ± 4879 |
| Mg | 39 | 8239 ± 1496 | 7900 | 5700 | 12,000 | 0.64 | 0.10 | 800 | 25 | 8238 ± 1470 | 14 | 8242 ± 1597 |
| P | 39 | 1602 ± 341 | 1580 | 162 | 2470 | −1.25 | 8.82 | 130 | 25 | 1612 ± 247 | 14 | 1585 ± 477 |
| S | 39 | 1253 ± 177 | 1240 | 860 | 1730 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 120 | 25 | 1288 ± 178 | 14 | 1190 ± 162 |
| Na | 39 | 808 ± 1509 | 459 | 265 | 9423 | 5.31 | 29.79 | 116 | 25 | 862 ± 1794 | 14 | 714 ± 836 |
| Fe | 39 | 230 ± 199 | 175 | 10 | 880 | 2.17 | 4.26 | 55.0 | 25 | 254 ± 203 | 14 | 189 ± 192 |
| Al | 39 | 261 ± 401 | 122 | 65 | 2500 | 4.88 | 26.7 | 23.0 | 25 | 320 ± 490 | 14 | 157 ± 103 |
| As | 37 | 0.17 ± 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.46 | 0.97 | 0.75 | 0.06 | 25 | 0.19 ± 0.11 | 14 | 0.14 ± 0.11 |
| Ba | 37 | 9.00 ± 3.21 | 9.00 | 5.00 | 15.0 | 0.22 | −0.99 | 3.00 | 25 | 8.41 ± 2.99 | 14 | 10.1 ± 3.43 |
| Br | 37 | 20.4 ± 12.9 | 17.0 | 6.30 | 80.0 | 2.98 | 12.1 | 6.00 | 25 | 22.8 ± 14.2 | 14 | 15.7 ± 8.94 |
| Cr | 37 | 1.06 ± 0.40 | 0.90 | 0.60 | 2.40 | 1.40 | 2.16 | 0.20 | 25 | 1.19 ± 0.42 | 14 | 0.82 ± 0.24 |
| Cu | 39 | 26.9 ± 15.0 | 23.0 | 16.0 | 99.0 | 3.80 | 15.6 | 3.00 | 25 | 26.5 ± 11.0 | 14 | 27.8 ± 20.8 |
| Mo | 37 | 0.14 ± 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.63 | 1.93 | 5.21 | 0.04 | 25 | 0.18 ± 0.13 | 14 | 0.07 ± 0.05 |
| Mn | 39 | 22.9 ± 6.77 | 22.0 | 14.0 | 45.0 | 1.09 | 1.52 | 5.00 | 25 | 23.4 ± 6.11 | 14 | 22.1 ± 7.98 |
| Pb | 39 | 2.61 ± 1.32 | 2.65 | 0.49 | 8.00 | 1.76 | 6.13 | 0.75 | 25 | 3.01 ± 1.39 | 14 | 1.89 ± 0.84 |
| Rb | 37 | 9.86 ± 3.78 | 10.0 | 4.00 | 17.0 | 0.26 | −0.92 | 3.00 | 25 | 9.87 ± 3.73 | 14 | 9.84 ± 4.03 |
| Sb | 37 | 0.51 ± 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.11 | 1.90 | 1.91 | 4.80 | 0.17 | 25 | 0.61 ± 0.40 | 14 | 0.34 ± 0.19 |
| Sc | 37 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.08 | −0.98 | 3.29 | 0.01 | 25 | 0.05 ± 0.005 | 14 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
| Sr | 39 | 46.1 ± 12.6 | 47.5 | 15.5 | 75.5 | −0.05 | 0.20 | 6.50 | 25 | 48.7 ± 12.7 | 14 | 41.3 ± 11.5 |
| Zn | 39 | 21.0 ± 4.09 | 21.0 | 14.5 | 31.0 | 0.43 | −0.13 | 3.00 | 25 | 21.5 ± 4.01 | 14 | 20.1 ± 4.21 |
Correlation matrix for selected elements (p < 0.01; ρ = 0.37).
| Spearman Matrix Correlation | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | Ca | Fe | K | Mg | Na | P | S | As | Ba | Br | Cr | Cu | Mo | Mn | Pb | Rb | Sb | Sc | Sr | Zn | |
|
|
| 0.13 | 0.25 | −0.17 | −0.05 | 0.17 | −0.12 | 0.10 | 0.05 | −0.13 | −0.08 | 0.14 | −0.02 | 0.11 |
| −0.03 | −0.12 | 0.06 | 0.04 | −0.12 | −0.15 |
|
|
| 0.06 | −0.45 | −0.07 | 0.10 | −0.29 | −0.07 | −0.12 | 0.32 | 0.05 | 0.00 | −0.43 | 0.05 | 0.29 | 0.18 | −0.35 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.29 | −0.40 | |
|
|
| −0.06 | −0.16 | −0.03 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.02 | −0.01 |
| 0.10 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.16 | −0.01 | 0.35 | 0.06 | −0.12 | 0.11 | ||
|
|
| −0.22 | −0.25 |
| −0.19 | 0.23 | 0.06 | −0.21 | 0.08 | 0.36 | 0.07 | −0.20 | −0.15 |
| 0.03 | 0.06 | −0.38 | 0.33 | |||
|
|
| 0.17 | −0.24 | −0.09 | −0.19 | −0.18 | −0.21 | −0.35 | 0.09 | −0.18 | 0.01 | −0.03 | 0.17 | −0.25 | 0.01 | −0.14 | 0.12 | ||||
|
|
| −0.47 | −0.05 | −0.69 | −0.13 | 0.28 | −0.07 | −0.10 | −0.15 | 0.10 | −0.06 | −0.04 | −0.05 | −0.09 | 0.01 | −0.25 | |||||
|
|
| 0.16 |
| 0.24 | −0.01 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.07 | −0.06 | −0.23 | 0.35 | 0.15 | 0.15 | −0.23 | 0.41 | ||||||
|
|
| 0.08 | −0.04 |
| 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.36 | 0.01 | −0.41 | 0.16 | −0.17 | 0.24 | 0.24 | |||||||
|
|
| 0.02 | −0.07 |
| 0.08 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.19 | −0.13 | 0.36 | ||||||||
|
|
| 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.04 | −0.06 | 0.02 | −0.15 | −0.22 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.05 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| 0.06 | 0.22 | 0.24 | −0.06 | −0.06 |
| −0.06 |
| 0.20 | ||||||||||
|
|
| 0.21 |
| 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.06 |
| 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.27 | |||||||||||
|
|
| 0.20 | −0.11 | 0.01 | 0.35 | 0.20 | −0.05 | 0.02 |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| 0.16 | 0.15 | −0.05 |
| 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.25 | |||||||||||||
|
|
| 0.03 | −0.32 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.15 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
| −0.09 | −0.01 | −0.13 | 0.16 | 0.17 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
| 0.04 | 0.08 | −0.26 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
| 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.27 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
| −0.15 | −0.07 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| 0.01 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Figure 2Cluster analysis dendrogram for 39 samples and 21 elements. Cluster analysis was based on Spearman’s rank correlation ρ.
Figure 3Average enrichment factors (EFs) for the analyzed elements in Ficus macrophylla leaves.
Figure 4Areal distribution maps of As, Cr, Mo, and Sb in F. macrophylla leaves. Data are expressed in μg g−1 (dry weight).
Non-parametric Mann–Whitney test between leaf samples from urban and city-garden sites (p < 0.05).
| N. URB | N. CG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 24 | 13 | 0.11 |
|
| 24 | 13 | 0.15 |
|
| 24 | 13 |
|
|
| 24 | 13 |
|
|
| 25 | 14 | 0.38 |
|
| 24 | 13 |
|
|
| 25 | 14 | 0.32 |
|
| 25 | 14 | 0.22 |
|
| 24 | 13 | 1.00 |
|
| 24 | 13 |
|
|
| 24 | 13 | 0.81 |
|
| 25 | 14 | 0.07 |
|
| 25 | 14 | 0.27 |
Figure 5Box and whisker plots displaying medians, quartiles, and extremes of Br, Cr, Mo, and Sb concentrations in Ficus macrophylla samples. Box interquartile ranges (25–75%) with median indication are shown by solid lines; vertical lines outside the box (whiskers) indicate the range (1–99%) between the highest and lowest observations, excluding the minimum and maximum. Data are given in μg g−1 (dry biomass).