Literature DB >> 19758587

Cellular uptake, subcellular distribution and toxicity of arsenic compounds in methylating and non-methylating cells.

E Dopp1, U von Recklinghausen, R Diaz-Bone, A V Hirner, A W Rettenmeier.   

Abstract

Arsenic is a known human carcinogen, inducing tumors of the skin, urinary bladder, liver and lung. Inorganic arsenic, existing in highly toxic trivalent and significantly less toxic pentavalent forms, is methylated to mono- and di-methylated species mainly in the liver. Due to the low toxicity of pentavalent methylated species, methylation has been regarded as a detoxification process for many years; however, recent findings of a high toxicity of trivalent methylated species have indicated the contrary. In order to elucidate the role of speciation and methylation for the toxicity and carcinogenicity of arsenic, systematic studies were conducted comparing cellular uptake, subcellular distribution as well as toxic and genotoxic effects of organic and inorganic pentavalent and trivalent arsenic species in both non-methylating (urothelial cells and fibroblasts) and methylating cells (hepatocytes). The membrane permeability was found to be dependent upon both the arsenic species and the cell type. Uptake rates of trivalent methylated species were highest and exceeded those of their pentavalent counterparts by several orders of magnitude. Non-methylating cells (urothelial cells and fibroblasts) seem to accumulate higher amounts of arsenic within the cell than the methylating hepatocytes. Cellular uptake and extrusion seem to be faster in hepatocytes than in urothelial cells. The correlation of uptake with toxicity indicates a significant role of membrane permeability towards toxicity. Furthermore, cytotoxic effects are more distinct in hepatocytes. Differential centrifugation studies revealed that elevated concentrations of arsenic are present in the ribosomal fraction of urothelial cells and in nucleic and mitochondrial fractions of hepatic cells. Further studies are needed to define the implications of the observed enrichment of arsenic in specific cellular organelles for its carcinogenic activity. This review summarizes our recent research on cellular uptake, distribution and toxicity of arsenic compounds in methylating and non-methylating cells. 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19758587     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  15 in total

1.  A transgenic Drosophila model for arsenic methylation suggests a metabolic rationale for differential dose-dependent toxicity endpoints.

Authors:  Jorge G Muñiz Ortiz; Junjun Shang; Brittany Catron; Julio Landero; Joseph A Caruso; Iain L Cartwright
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  A review of toxicity and mechanisms of individual and mixtures of heavy metals in the environment.

Authors:  Xiangyang Wu; Samuel J Cobbina; Guanghua Mao; Hai Xu; Zhen Zhang; Liuqing Yang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Chronic occupational exposure to arsenic induces carcinogenic gene signaling networks and neoplastic transformation in human lung epithelial cells.

Authors:  Todd A Stueckle; Yongju Lu; Mary E Davis; Liying Wang; Bing-Hua Jiang; Ida Holaskova; Rosana Schafer; John B Barnett; Yon Rojanasakul
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 4.  The case for visual analytics of arsenic concentrations in foods.

Authors:  Matilda O Johnson; Hari H P Cohly; Raphael D Isokpehi; Omotayo R Awofolu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Arsenic is cytotoxic and genotoxic to primary human lung cells.

Authors:  Hong Xie; Shouping Huang; Sarah Martin; John P Wise
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.873

6.  Monomethylated trivalent arsenic species disrupt steroid receptor interactions with their DNA response elements at non-cytotoxic cellular concentrations.

Authors:  Julie A Gosse; Vivien F Taylor; Brian P Jackson; Joshua W Hamilton; Jack E Bodwell
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.446

7.  Accumulation, transformation, and release of inorganic arsenic by the freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa.

Authors:  Zhenhong Wang; Zhuanxi Luo; Changzhou Yan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 8.  Origins, fate, and actions of methylated trivalent metabolites of inorganic arsenic: progress and prospects.

Authors:  Miroslav Stýblo; Abhishek Venkatratnam; Rebecca C Fry; David J Thomas
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 9.  Arsenic and Human Health: Genotoxicity, Epigenomic Effects, and Cancer Signaling.

Authors:  Munir Ozturk; Mert Metin; Volkan Altay; Rouf Ahmad Bhat; Mahnoor Ejaz; Alvina Gul; Bengu Turkyilmaz Unal; Mirza Hasanuzzaman; Lutfunnahar Nibir; Kamuran Nahar; Andleep Bukhari; Moonisa Aslam Dervash; Tomonori Kawano
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Toxicological Characterization of the Inorganic and Organic Arsenic Metabolite Thio-DMA in Cultured Human Lung Cells.

Authors:  Marc Bartel; Franziska Ebert; Larissa Leffers; Uwe Karst; Tanja Schwerdtle
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2011-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.