| Literature DB >> 32022368 |
Zhuoshan Huang1, Zhenda Zheng1, Bingyuan Wu1, Leile Tang1, Xujing Xie1, Ruimin Dong1, Yanting Luo1, Suhua Li1, Jieming Zhu1, Jinlai Liu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have explored the association between P wave terminal force in lead V1 (PTFV1) and risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence, but the results were controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to examine whether abnormal PTFV1 could predict AF occurrence.Entities:
Keywords: P wave terminal force in lead V1; atrial fibrillation; electrocardiogram; predictor
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32022368 PMCID: PMC7358887 DOI: 10.1111/anec.12739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol ISSN: 1082-720X Impact factor: 1.468
Figure 1Flowchart of identifying the studies in the meta‐analysis
Basic characteristic of the included studies
| First author/Year | Location | Study population | Sample size ( | Age (years) | No. of Male | No. of AF | AF diagnosis | Follow‐up time (years) | Study design | Quality score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lehtonen et al. ( | Finland | Finnish adult population ≥ 30 years | 5,667 | 51.5 ± 14.1 | 2,557 | 423 | ICD−10 code I48 in the National Hospital Discharge or Causes of Death registers during follow‐up or AF in the Health 2011 Survey follow‐up ECG | 11.9 ± 2.9 | Prospective cohort study | 8 |
| Goda et al. ( | Japan | Acute ischemic stroke patients | 226 | 74.2 ± 11.7 | 134 | 16 | Bedside ECG monitoring | ‐ | Cross‐sectional study | 7 |
| Sugiyama et al. ( | Japan | Acute ischemic stroke patients | 105 | 72.8 ± 13.4 | NA | 11 | 24‐hr ECG monitoring | ‐ | Cross‐sectional study | 6 |
| Rasmussen et al. ( | Denmark | no apparent heart disease or AF with age between 55–75 | 678 | 55–75 | NA | 77 | NA | 14 | Prospective cohort study | 7 |
| Baturova et al. ( | United States | Ischemic stroke patients | 165 | 67.3 ± 10.0 | 106 | 55 | NA | ‐ | Retrospective study | 7 |
| Magnani et al. ( | United States | General population | 3,110 | 62.6 ± 9.8 | 1,339 | 217 | ECG, Holter, and tracings at or external to FHS after adjudication by 2 physicians | 10 | Prospective cohort study | 8 |
| Magnani et al. ( | United States | General population | 8,254 | 62.3 ± 5.6 | 3,521 | 458 | Review of hospital discharge records for ICD−9 codes 427.31 or 427.32 | 10 | Prospective cohort study | 8 |
| Francia et al. ( | Italy | Hypertensive patients | 88 | 67.2 ± 8.0 | 54 | 44 | Standard or Holter ECG | ‐ | Case–control study | 8 |
| Kamel et al. ( | United States | men and women aged 45–84 years who were free of clinically apparent cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease, including AF | 6,741 | 62.1 ± 10.2 | 3,174 | 541 | ECG | 8.5 (7.7–8.6) | Prospective cohort study | 7 |
| Eranti et al. ( | Finland | males and females aged 30–59 years who underwent clinical baseline examinations | 10,647 | 43.9 ± 1.3 | 5,619 | 1606 | Obtained from the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register | 35–41 | Prospective cohort study | 7 |
| Nishi et al. ( | Japan | hemodialysis patients | 262 | 62.2 ± 14.2 | 149 | 45 | ECG | 5 | Prospective cohort study | 7 |
| Soliman et al. ( | United States | General population | 15,429 | 52.4 ± 5.8 | 6,887 | 117 | ECG | 6.97 ± 1.46 | Prospective cohort study | 9 |
Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; ARIC, The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study; ECG, electrocardiogram; FHS, Framingham Heart Study.
Figure 2Forrest plots. (a) Forrest plot of studies PTFV1 analyzed as a categorical variable in meta‐analysis. (b) Forrest plot of studies PTFV1 analyzed as a continuous variable in meta‐analysis
Figure 3Funnel plots. (a) Funnel plot of studies PTFV1 analyzed as a categorical variable. (b) Funnel plot of studies PTFV1 analyzed as a continuous variable
Subgroup analysis
| Subgroup | OR (95% CI) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Area | |||
| Asia( | 1.89 (1.38–2.60) | <.001 | 89.50 |
| Europe( | 1.05 (0.91–1.20) | .506 | 24.51 |
| United States( | 1.43 (1.19–1.72) | <.001 | 65.88 |
| Measurement methods | |||
| Manual( | 1.83 (1.01–3.36) | .050 | 88.33 |
| Machine( | 1.18 (1.03–1.36) | .017 | 72.87 |
| Study type | |||
| Prospective( | 1.20 (1.07–1.33) | .001 | 80.51 |
| Nonprospective( | 1.60 (1.14–2.25) | .007 | 64.50 |
| Population | |||
| General population( | 1.15 (1.03–1.29) | .010 | 64.02 |
| Acute ischemic stroke patients( | 1.60 (1.14–2.25) | .007 | 64.50 |
| Hemodialysis patients( | 4.89 (2.54–9.90) | ‐ | 0 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratios.
Figure 4Meta‐regression plots of ORs of endpoints against continuous variables, including (a) age, (b) study quality score, (c) follow‐up time, (d) sample size, (e) percentage of AF, and (f) percentage of male