Literature DB >> 32021030

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Oxford, Constant, and UCLA shoulder score for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Sheng Xu1, Jerry Yongqiang Chen1, Hannah Mei En Lie1, Ying Hao2, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Lie1.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for Constant-Murley score (CMS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, and Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS) after arthroscopic rotator cuff (RC) repairs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 306 patients were followed up for 24-month. MCID for CMS, UCLA and OSS were determined using simple linear regression according to patient satisfaction and expectation fulfilment.
RESULTS: The following MCID were identified:12-month: CMS 6.7, UCLA 3.0, OSS 3.3.24-month: CMS 6.3, UCLA 2.9, OSS 2.7.
CONCLUSIONS: The various MCID could assist in meaningful interpretation of these scores and to power future comparative studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
© 2019 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopy; Constant murley score; Minimal clinically important difference; Oxford shoulder score; Rotator cuff; University of California los Angeles shoulder score

Year:  2019        PMID: 32021030      PMCID: PMC6994807          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  23 in total

Review 1.  Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods.

Authors:  G Wells; D Beaton; B Shea; M Boers; L Simon; V Strand; P Brooks; P Tugwell
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 2.  Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Dennis Revicki; Ron D Hays; David Cella; Jeff Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to assess power and sample size. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy.

Authors:  Margherita Cadeddu; Forough Farrokhyar; Achilleas Thoma; Ted Haines; Anna Garnett; Charles H Goldsmith
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  The influence of obesity on functional outcome and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty: a ten-year follow-up study.

Authors:  S Xu; J Y Chen; N N Lo; S L Chia; D K J Tay; H N Pang; Y Hao; S J Yeo
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; J Singer; G H Guyatt
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-12

6.  The minimal clinically important difference for Knee Society Clinical Rating System after total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Wu Chean Lee; Yu Heng Kwan; Hwei Chi Chong; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Costs, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic and open repair for rotator cuff tears: an economic evaluation alongside the UKUFF trial.

Authors:  J Murphy; A Gray; C Cooper; D Cooper; C Ramsay; A Carr
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  N D Clement; D MacDonald; A H R W Simpson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease.

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Julia Deloach; Andrew Green; Christina A Porucznik; Amy P Powell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  Alexandra Kirkley; Sharon Griffin; Katie Dainty
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State of Outcome Measures Relating to Shoulder Pathology and Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Favian Su; Sachin Allahabadi; Dale N Bongbong; Brian T Feeley; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-01-12

2.  Is single stage capsular release and rotator cuff repair suitable for rotator tears with concomitant stiffness?

Authors:  Wai Keong Mak; Winston Shang Rong Lim; Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Lie
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-09-03

Review 3.  Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using the Biceps Tendon in the Treatment of Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Improves Patient-Reported Outcome Scores: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Naga Suresh Cheppalli; Prabhudev Prasad Purudappa; Sreenivasulu Metikala; Krishna I Reddy; Amit Singla; Harshadkumar A Patel; Srinath Kamineni
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-23

4.  What is the optimal surgical intervention for patients with frozen shoulder and a concomitant partial-thickness rotator cuff tear?

Authors:  Winston Shang Rong Lim; Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Lie; Amit Kanta Mitra; Paul Chee Cheng Chang
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-07-22

5.  Increased preoperative greater tuberosity angle does not affect patient-reported outcomes postarthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Cheryl Gatot; Merrill Lee; Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Benjamin Ang Fu Hong; Denny Lie Tijauw Tjoen
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-12-07

6.  Lateral Acromioplasty has a Positive Impact on Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients with a Critical Shoulder Angle Greater than 35 Degrees.

Authors:  Edoardo Franceschetti; Edoardo Giovannetti de Sanctis; Alessio Palumbo; Riccardo Ranieri; Paola Casti; Arianna Mencattini; Nicola Maffulli; Francesco Franceschi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Arthroscopic repair is sufficient for treating recurrent shoulder instability in patients with bipolar bone defects and minor glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Andrew Chia Chen Chou; Benjamin Joseph Kang; Aaron Junjie Tan; Denny Tijauw Tjoen Lie
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-12

8.  Septuagenarians aged 75 years and older do benefit from arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a propensity matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Akshay Padki; Jerry Yongqian Chen; Merrill Jian Hui Lee; Benjamin Fu Hong Ang; Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Lie
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-03-09

9.  Comparing the Predictors of Functional Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Modified Frailty Index, Clinical Frailty Scale, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.

Authors:  Vikaesh Moorthy; Merrill Lee; Benjamin Fu Hong Ang; Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Lie
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-07-15

10.  Arthroscopic Repair of Humeral Avulsion of Glenohumeral Ligament Lesions: Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Alon Grundshtein; Efi Kazum; Ofir Chechik; Oleg Dolkart; Ehud Rath; Assaf Bivas; Eran Maman
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.