Literature DB >> 32020321

A limited sampling strategy to estimate exposure of once-daily modified release tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients using linear regression analysis and comparison with Bayesian population pharmacokinetics in different cohorts.

Frank Stifft1, Franciscus Vandermeer2, Cees Neef2, Sander van Kuijk3, Maarten H L Christiaans4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window. Measuring trough level (C0) as surrogate for drug exposure (AUC) in renal transplant recipients has limitations. Therefore, limited sampling strategies (LSS's) have been developed. For the newer modified release, once-daily formulation (Tac QD) LSS's are based on either linear regression analysis (LRA) or population pharmacokinetics with maximum a posteriori Bayesian (MAPB) estimation. The predictive performances of both methods were compared, also to LSS's as described in literature.
METHODS: LSS's (maximally three sampling time points) were developed for Tac QD from full 24-h sampling by LRA in 27 Caucasian, stable renal transplant recipients. Performance for accuracy (mean absolute prediction error < 10%) and precision (root mean squared error < 15%) was quantified also after MAPB estimation in two independent groups (early and late post-transplant, n = 12 each).
RESULTS: LRA determined a single 8 hours post-dose measurement (C8) to fulfil predefined criteria for accuracy (MAPE 3.41%) and precision (RMSE 4.28%). The best LSS contained C2, C8 and C12 for the stable (MAPE 2.42%, RMSE 3.1%) and the early post-transplant group (MAPE 2.46%, RMSE 3.14%). LRA did not include C0 for any LSS, unless it was forced into the model. MAPB estimation showed similar performance.
CONCLUSIONS: In renal transplant patients, sampling in the elimination phase (C8) accurately predicted Tac QD exposure, contrary to C0. The 3-point sampling C2, C8 and C12 had the best performance and is also valid early post-transplant. These LSS's were similarly predictive with MAPB estimation. Dried blood spot could facilitate late sampling in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney transplantation; Limited sampling strategy; Pharmacokinetics; Tacrolimus; Therapeutic drug monitoring

Year:  2020        PMID: 32020321     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-019-02814-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  31 in total

1.  The roles of C4 and AUC0-4 in monitoring of tacrolimus in stable kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  T Pisitkun; S Eiam-Ong; S Chusil; K Praditpornsilpa; P Pansin; K Tungsanga
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Trough levels of tacrolimus.

Authors:  L M L Stolk; E M Van Duijnhoven; M H L Christiaans; J P van Hooff
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.681

3.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Authors:  Ling Xue; Hua Zhang; Sheng Ma; Jian-Zhong Rui; Li-Yan Miao
Journal:  Pharmacology       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.547

4.  Abbreviated tacrolimus area-under-the-curve monitoring for renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  K M Wong; C C Shek; K F Chau; C S Li
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Conversion of stable liver transplant recipients from a twice-daily Prograf-based regimen to a once-daily modified release tacrolimus-based regimen.

Authors:  S Florman; R Alloway; M Kalayoglu; K Lake; T Bak; A Klein; G Klintmalm; S Busque; D Brandenhagen; J Lake; K Wisemandle; W Fitzsimmons; M R First
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  Pharmacokinetic Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Advagraf in More Than 500 Adult Renal Transplant Patients, Using an Expert System Online.

Authors:  Pierre Marquet; Anne Bedu; Caroline Monchaud; Franck Saint-Marcoux; Jean-Philippe Rérolle; Isabelle Etienne; Nassim Kamar; Bruno Moulin; Elisabeth Cassuto; Marie Essig; Jean-Baptiste Woillard
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.681

8.  Evaluation of limited sampling strategies for tacrolimus.

Authors:  Robert A M Op den Buijsch; Afke van de Plas; Leo M L Stolk; Maarten H L Christiaans; Johannes P van Hooff; Nas A Undre; Marja P van Dieijen-Visser; Otto Bekers
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Effect of Breakfast on the Exposure of the Once-Daily Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Frank Stifft; Nasrullah Undre; Johannes P van Hooff; Maarten H L Christiaans
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.681

10.  Pharmacokinetics for once- versus twice-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplantation: a randomized, open-label trial.

Authors:  Z Wlodarczyk; J-P Squifflet; M Ostrowski; P Rigotti; S Stefoni; F Citterio; Y Vanrenterghem; B K Krämer; D Abramowicz; F Oppenheimer; F Pietruck; G Russ; C Karpf; N Undre
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.