| Literature DB >> 32019157 |
Franco Dominici1, Fabrizio Sarasini2, Francesca Luzi1, Luigi Torre1, Debora Puglia1.
Abstract
Calcium terephthalate anhydrous salts (CATAS), synthetized by reaction of terephthalic acid with metal (Ca) oxide were incorporated at different weight contents (0-30 wt. %) in recycled Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (rPET) by melt processing. Their structure, morphology, thermal and mechanical properties (tensile and flexural behavior) were investigated. Results of tensile strength of the different formulations showed that when the CATAS content increased from 0.1 to 0.4 wt. %, tangible changes were observed (variation of tensile strength from 65.5 to 69.4 MPa, increasing value for E from 2887 up to 3131 MPa, respectively for neat rPET and rPET_0.4CATAS). A threshold weight amount (0.4 wt. %) of CATAS was also found, by formation at low loading, of a rigid amorphous fraction at the rPET/CATAS interface, due to the aromatic interactions (π-π conjugation) between the matrix and the filler. Above the threshold, a restriction of rPET/CATAS molecular chains mobility was detected, due to the formation of hybrid mechanical percolation networks. Additionally, enhanced thermal stability of CATAS filled rPET was registered at high content (Tmax shift from 426 to 441 °C, respectively, for rPET and rPET_30CATAS), essentially due to chemical compatibility between terephthalate salts and polymer molecules, rich in stable aromatic rings. The singularity of a cold crystallization event, identified at the same loading level, confirmed the presence of an equilibrium state between nucleation and blocking effect of amorphous phase, basically related to the characteristic common terephthalate structure of synthetized Ca-Metal Organic Framework and the rPET matrix.Entities:
Keywords: Calcium terephthalate salts; high performance nanocomposites; rPET; recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)
Year: 2020 PMID: 32019157 PMCID: PMC7077421 DOI: 10.3390/polym12020276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Developed formulations based on rPET and CATAS.
| Sample Name | rPET [%] wt. | CATAS [%] wt. |
|---|---|---|
| rPET | 100 | --- |
| rPET_0.1CATAS | 99.9 | 0.1 |
| rPET_0.25CATAS | 99.75 | 0.25 |
| rPET_0.4CATAS | 99.6 | 0.4 |
| rPET_0.5CATAS | 99.5 | 0.5 |
| rPET_1CATAS | 99 | 1 |
| rPET_2CATAS | 98 | 2 |
| rPET_3CATAS | 97 | 3 |
| rPET_10CATAS | 90 | 10 |
| rPET_20CATAS | 80 | 20 |
| rPET_30CATAS | 70 | 30 |
Figure 1Chemical structure of calcium terephthalate salts (a) and FESEM morphology in their hydrated (b) and anhydrous state (c).
Figure 2XRD profile for CATAS (a); TG/DTG curves for CATS (b); and CATAS nanofillers (c); thickness distribution for CATAS (d).
Figure 3G’ (a) and tan δ curve (b) from DMTA tests for rPET and rPET/CATAS nanocomposites.
Calculated values of tan δ and G’ at 50 and 150 °C for the rPET/CATAS nanocomposites.
| MATERIAL | G’ @ T = 50 °C | G’ @ T = 150 °C | Tg (at tan δ peak) |
|---|---|---|---|
| rPET | 0.89 | 0.61 | 90.41 |
| rPET_1CATAS | 1.00 | 0.68 | 90.48 |
| rPET_10CATAS | 1.19 | 0.96 | 90.89 |
| rPET_20CATAS | 1.47 | 1.54 | 91.29 |
| rPET_30CATAS | 1.92 | 2.76 | 93.43 |
Figure 4Stress-strain curves from flexural (a) and tensile tests (b), variation of tensile modulus and strain at break (c), variation of flexural stress and strain (d) for rPET_CATAS nanocomposites at the different loading levels.
Tensile parameters of rPET_CATAS nanocomposites at the different loading levels.
| MATERIAL | Young’s Modulus | Stress | Strain at Maximum Stress (%) | Stress at Break | Strain at Break | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rPET | 2887 | ±178 | 65.5 | ±3.6 | 3.99 | ±0.21 | 41.0 | ±5.2 | 244.2 | ±16.9 |
| rPET_0.1CATAS | 2819 | ±283 | 61.7 | ±4.2 | 3.68 | ±0.23 | 41.7 | ±3.1 | 178.9 | ±20.7 |
| rPET_0.25CATAS | 3186 | ±115 | 68.9 | ±2.3 | 3.98 | ±0.28 | 41.9 | ±1.9 | 18.3 | ±3.6 |
| rPET_0.4CATAS | 3131 | ±342 | 69.4 | ±1.7 | 3.89 | ±0.27 | 42.4 | ±3.2 | 19.7 | ±4.5 |
| rPET_0.5CATAS | 2867 | ±201 | 66.8 | ±0.1 | 3.90 | ±0.28 | 39.6 | ±0.5 | 20.2 | ±2.3 |
| rPET_1CATAS | 2898 | ±206 | 67.4 | ±2.5 | 3.78 | ±0.26 | 43.2 | ±1.7 | 43.6 | ±1.6 |
| rPET_2CATAS | 3099 | ±145 | 64.8 | ±1.4 | 3.12 | ±0.38 | 39.4 | ±0.5 | 51.0 | ±0.9 |
| rPET_3CATAS | 3225 | ±148 | 61.9 | ±8.8 | 2.91 | ±0.36 | 61.8 | ±8.8 | 2.9 | ±1.1 |
| rPET_10CATAS | 3751 | ±549 | 45.5 | ±14.1 | 1.60 | ±0.42 | 45.5 | ±14.1 | 1.6 | ±0.7 |
| rPET_20CATAS | 4943 | ±517 | 36.5 | ±10.2 | 1.34 | ±0.51 | 36.5 | ±10.3 | 1.3 | ±0.5 |
| rPET_30CATAS | 5408 | ±645 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | ±0.1 |
Figure 5XRD diffraction curves for rPET and rPET/CATAS nanocomposites at low and high loadings.
Figure 6FESEM images of fractured surfaces for rPET and rPET/CATAS nanocomposites.
TGA parameters of rPET_CATAS nanocomposites at three representative loading levels (0, 3 and 30 wt. %).
| Material | Ton | T20% | Tmax | Residual Mass (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rPET | 350 | 417 | 426 | 13.7 |
| rPET_3CATAS | 350 | 418 | 427 | 12.3 |
| rPET_30CATAS | 335 | 439 | 441 | 23.6 |
Figure 7TG curve (a) and DTG curve (b) for rPET and rPET/CATAS nanocomposites at 3 and 30 wt. % of CATAS.
Figure 8DSC heating scan for rPET and rPET/CATAS nanocomposites at low (a) and high (b) loading levels.
Figure 9Evolution of different phase fractions for rPET and rPET_CATAS content.