Literature DB >> 32017178

Legal regulations, ethical guidelines and recent policies to increase transparency of clinical trials.

Jan Borysowski1,2, Agata Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska3, Andrzej Górski2,4.   

Abstract

Timely and accurate dissemination of outcomes is essential to accomplish main benefits of scientific research including clinical trials. Clinical trial results can be disseminated in two main ways: by publication in a peer-reviewed journal and by posting on a publicly available clinical trial register. The credibility of the literature on clinical trials is significantly diminished because a high percentage of trials is not published. While current legal regulations both in the European Union (EU) and the USA impose a duty to submit summary results of clinical trials to a respective register (EU Clinical Trial Register and ClinicalTrials.gov, respectively), the compliance with this requirement has been generally inadequate. Trial outcomes can be also made accessible by data sharing. However, in spite of the wide promotion of this idea, the access of investigators to participant-level datasets remains limited. The main objective of this review is to discuss current legal regulations, international standards, ethical guidelines and recent policies pertaining to dissemination of clinical trial results.
© 2020 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ClinicalTrials.gov; EU Clinical Trial Register; clinical trial; clinical trial register; data sharing

Year:  2020        PMID: 32017178      PMCID: PMC7098869          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  39 in total

1.  Illegitimate authorship and flawed procedures: Fundamental, formal criticisms of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Authors:  Hans-Joerg Ehni; Urban Wiesing
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 1.898

2.  The package insert: who writes it and why, what are its implications, and how well does medical school explain it?

Authors:  David McMahon; Sheldon H Preskorn
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.325

3.  Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2016-09-21

4.  Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Fujian Song; Andrew Vickers; Tom Jefferson; Kay Dickersin; Peter C Gøtzsche; Harlan M Krumholz; Davina Ghersi; H Bart van der Worp
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Publication of lung cancer clinical trials in the Japanese Clinical Trial Registry.

Authors:  Nobuaki Ochi; Tatsuyuki Kawahara; Yasunari Nagasaki; Nozomu Nakagawa; Tomoko Yamagishi; Shigeki Umemura; Yoshihiro Honda; Hidekazu Nakanishi; Hiromichi Yamane; Nagio Takigawa
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries.

Authors:  Christine Schmucker; Lisa K Schell; Susan Portalupi; Patrick Oeller; Laura Cabrera; Dirk Bassler; Guido Schwarzer; Roberta W Scherer; Gerd Antes; Erik von Elm; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Clinical trial transparency: a reassessment of industry compliance with clinical trial registration and reporting requirements in the United States.

Authors:  Scott M Lassman; Olivia M Shopshear; Ina Jazic; Jocelyn Ulrich; Jeffrey Francer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  How to avoid common problems when using ClinicalTrials.gov in research: 10 issues to consider.

Authors:  Tony Tse; Kevin M Fain; Deborah A Zarin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-05-25

9.  Clinical trial registration and reporting: a survey of academic organizations in the United States.

Authors:  Evan Mayo-Wilson; James Heyward; Anthony Keyes; Jesse Reynolds; Sarah White; Nidhi Atri; G Caleb Alexander; Audrey Omar; Daniel E Ford
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Registration, results reporting, and publication bias of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of neuropsychiatric drugs before and after FDAAA: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Constance X Zou; Jessica E Becker; Adam T Phillips; James M Garritano; Harlan M Krumholz; Jennifer E Miller; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Legal regulations, ethical guidelines and recent policies to increase transparency of clinical trials.

Authors:  Jan Borysowski; Agata Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska; Andrzej Górski
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  From publication bias to lost in information: why we need a central public portal for clinical trial data.

Authors:  Beate Wieseler; Natalie McGauran
Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med       Date:  2020-12-10

3.  Results publications are inadequately linked to trial registrations: An automated pipeline and evaluation of German university medical centers.

Authors:  Maia Salholz-Hillel; Daniel Strech; Benjamin Gregory Carlisle
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.599

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.