Literature DB >> 32013724

The Moral Psychology of Raceless, Genderless Strangers.

Neil Hester1, Kurt Gray2.   

Abstract

Moral psychology uses tightly controlled scenarios in which the identities of the characters are either unspecified or vague. Studies with raceless, genderless strangers help to highlight the important structural elements of moral acts (e.g., intention, causation, harm) but may not generalize to real-world judgments. As researchers have long shown, social judgments hinge on the identities (e.g., race, gender, age, religion, group affiliation) of both target and perceiver. Asking whether people generally condemn "shooting someone" is very different from asking whether liberals as opposed to conservatives condemn "a White police officer shooting a Black suspect." We argue for the importance of incorporating identity into moral psychology. We briefly outline the central role of identity in social judgments before reviewing current theories in moral psychology. We then advocate an expanded person-centered morality-synthesizing moral psychology with social cognition-to better capture everyday moral judgments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  WEIRD psychology; external validity; person perception; stereotyping

Year:  2020        PMID: 32013724     DOI: 10.1177/1745691619885840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  6 in total

1.  Speaking my truth: Why personal experiences can bridge divides but mislead.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Diego A Reinero; Victoria Spring; Elizabeth A Harris; Annie Duke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations.

Authors:  Daniel L Rosenfeld; Emily Balcetis; Brock Bastian; Elliot T Berkman; Jennifer K Bosson; Tiffany N Brannon; Anthony L Burrow; C Daryl Cameron; Serena Chen; Jonathan E Cook; Christian Crandall; Shai Davidai; Kristof Dhont; Paul W Eastwick; Sarah E Gaither; Steven W Gangestad; Thomas Gilovich; Kurt Gray; Elizabeth L Haines; Martie G Haselton; Nick Haslam; Gordon Hodson; Michael A Hogg; Matthew J Hornsey; Yuen J Huo; Samantha Joel; Frank J Kachanoff; Gordon Kraft-Todd; Mark R Leary; Alison Ledgerwood; Randy T Lee; Steve Loughnan; Cara C MacInnis; Traci Mann; Damian R Murray; Carolyn Parkinson; Efrén O Pérez; Tom Pyszczynski; Kaylin Ratner; Hank Rothgerber; James D Rounds; Mark Schaller; Roxane Cohen Silver; Barbara A Spellman; Nina Strohminger; Janet K Swim; Felix Thoemmes; Betul Urganci; Joseph A Vandello; Sarah Volz; Vivian Zayas; A Janet Tomiyama
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-10-01

3.  Binding moral values gain importance in the presence of close others.

Authors:  Daniel A Yudkin; Ana P Gantman; Wilhelm Hofmann; Jordi Quoidbach
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  The effect of deliberative process on the self-sacrificial decisions of utilitarian healthcare students.

Authors:  Yongmin Shin; Seungmin Kim; Do-Hwan Kim; Seunghee Lee; Minhae Cho; Jungjoon Ihm
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Science as collaborative knowledge generation.

Authors:  Naomi Ellemers
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2020-12-07

6.  Moral Judgment as Categorization (MJAC).

Authors:  Cillian McHugh; Marek McGann; Eric R Igou; Elaine L Kinsella
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-07-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.