| Literature DB >> 32013042 |
Gyeong-Ji Kim1,2, Daniel Kim3, Kwon-Jai Lee4, Daeyoung Kim5, Kang-Hyun Chung6, Jeong Woo Choi2,7, Jeung Hee An1.
Abstract
<span class="Chemical">Calcium-type montmorillonite, a <span class="Chemical">phyllosilicate mineral, has diverse health benefits when introduced into the gastrointestinal tract or applied to the skin. However, the predominant use of this layered material has thus far been in traditional industries, despite its potential application in the pharmaceutical industry. We investigated the effects and mechanism of nano-montmorillonite (NM) on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation in vivo and in vitro. We examined the osteogenic effects of NM with high calcium content (3.66 wt%) on alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, mineralization, bone microarchitecture, and expression level of osteoblast and osteoclast related genes in Ca-deficient ovariectomized (OVX) rats. Micro-computed tomography of OVX rats revealed that NM attenuated the low-Ca-associated changes in trabecular and cortical bone mineral density. It improved ALP activity and mineralization, as well as the expression of osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation associated genes. NM also activated the expression of runt-related transcription factor 2, osteocalcin, bone morphogenetic protein 2, and type 1 collagen via phosphorylated small mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 1/5/8 signaling. Further, NM repressed the expression of receptor activator for cathepsin K, nuclear factor kappa-B ligand and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase. Therefore, NM inhibits osteoclastogenesis, stimulates osteoblastogenesis, and alleviates osteoporosis.Entities:
Keywords: bone formation; nano-montmorillonite; osteoblasts; osteoclasts; ovariectomy rats
Year: 2020 PMID: 32013042 PMCID: PMC7075198 DOI: 10.3390/nano10020230
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(A) X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) pattern, (B) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image (magnified 15.58K-fold), (C) energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) spectrum of purified montmorillonite, and (D) particle-size distribution of the nano-montmorillonite suspension.
Figure 2Effect of nano-montmorillonite (NM) on alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and mineralization during differentiation in MG-63 cells. (A) Cells were treated with the indicated NM concentrations for 24 h before measuring the cell viability and for 96 h before measuring the ALP activity, as described in Materials and Methods. Scale bar: 20 μm. (B,C) Cells were treated as indicated for 14 days before staining the mineralized matrix with alizarin red S and quantifying the mineralization as described in Materials and Methods. Effect of NM on RAW 264.7 cell viability (D), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activity (E), and TRAP staining (F, control and NM 500 μg/mL) during differentiation. Scale bar: 20 μm. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD. Values not sharing a common superscript (a–c) differed significantly (Duncan’s multiple range test) (p < 0.05).
Figure 3MG-63 osteoblast and RAW 264.7 osteoclast mRNA and protein expression levels of molecules involved in bone metabolism and signaling. (A,B) The cells were differentiated for 4 days in differentiation medium prior to reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) analysis of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), runt related transcription factor-2 (RUNX2), osteocalcin, and type 1 collagen (COL-1); mRNA levels and protein levels. (C) Levels of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK), p-p38, phosphorylated serine/threonine kinase (p-AKT), and phosphorylated c-Jun N-terminal kinase (p-JNK) were determined by Western blot. (D) mRNA expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANK), tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), and cathepsin K. The relative expression was quantified using ImageJ and calculated relative to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and β-actin. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD. Values not sharing a common superscript (a,b) differed significantly (Duncan’s multiple range test) (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Breaking force graph for the rat tibia. (A) Details of the breaking force measurement by texture analysis. (B) Breaking force required for rat tibias. (C) Tibial Ca levels in the indicated rats. (D) The value of the tibial Ca levels when sham was set to 100%. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD. Values not sharing a common superscript (a–c) differed significantly (Duncan’s multiple range test) (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Tibial bone microstructure of ovariectomized (OVX) rats. (A) Longitudinal and cross-sections of trabeculae. (B) Trabecular bone and cortical bone analysis. Each value is expressed as the mean ± SD. Values not sharing a common superscript (a-c) differed significantly (Duncan’s multiple range test) (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Histomorphology of the tibia of ovariectomized (OVX) rats. (A) Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain, von Kossa stain, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) stain of the tibia. Black triangles indicate osteoclasts. Scale bar: 20 μm (B) Immunohistochemical staining image of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), Wnt family member 3a (Wnt3a), runt-related transcription factor-2 (RUNX2), osteocalcin, and type 1 collagen (COL-1) in OVX rats. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Figure 7In vivo gene expression and histomorphology of the tibia of ovariectomized (OVX) rats. (A) mRNA expression levels of osteoblast differentiation factors: bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), Wnt family member 3a (Wnt3a), runt-related transcription factor-2 (RUNX2), osteocalcin, and type-1 collagen (COL-1). (B) Protein expression levels of osteoblast differentiation factors: BMP-2, Wnt3a, phosphorylated small mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 1/5/8 (p-SMAD 1/5/8), and RUNX2. (C) Expression levels of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK), p-p38, phosphorylated serine/threonine kinase (p-AKT), and phosphorylated c-Jun N-terminal kinase (p-JNK). (D) mRNA expression levels of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANK), tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), and cathepsin K in vivo. Each value is expressed as the mean ± SD. Values not sharing a common superscript (a–d) differed significantly (Duncan’s multiple range test) (p < 0.05).
Figure 8Effect of nano-montmorillonite on osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis.