Literature DB >> 32011101

Measurement invariances of the PHQ-9 across gender and age groups in Chinese adolescents.

Doris Y P Leung1, Yim Wah Mak1, Sau Fong Leung1, Vico C L Chiang1, Alice Yuen Loke1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is widely used to determine the severity of depression in adult populations, but its psychometric properties with regard to adolescents has been poorly explored. The present study aims to identify the factor structure and examine the measurement invariance of this instrument across genders and age groups in a Chinese adolescent sample.
METHODS: A large sample of Chinese schoolchildren completed the PHQ-9 in a cross-sectional survey in Hong Kong (N = 10 933). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the factor structure and a multiple group CFA to test the gender and age invariances of the PHQ-9 in adolescents were conducted. Cronbach alpha was used to assess the reliability of the questionnaire, and Pearson correlations with anxiety, self-esteem, and perceived control were used to assess its construct validity.
RESULTS: The CFA results indicate that a one-factor model with three pairs of item correlations fitted the PHQ-9 data well, and measurement invariances by age and gender were supported. The PHQ-9 also possesses adequate internal consistency (>.84) and is strongly correlated with anxiety (>.77), self-esteem (<-.57), and perceived control (<-.56) in the expected directions in the overall sample and in the gender and age subsamples. DISCUSSION: The results support the claim that the PHQ-9 is a reliable and valid scale and can be used to assess and compare depressive severity across ages and genders during the period of adolescence.
© 2020 The Authors. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chinese adolescents; PHQ-9; gender; measurement invariances; sage

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32011101      PMCID: PMC7507123          DOI: 10.1111/appy.12381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac Psychiatry        ISSN: 1758-5864            Impact factor:   2.538


INTRODUCTION

The onset of depression often occurs in adolescence (Avenevoli, Swendsen, He, Burstein, & Merikangas, 2015; Rohde, Lewinsohn, Klein, Seely, & Gau, 2013), and those who experience the early onset of depression are at an elevated risk of subsequently manifesting psychosocial and health adversities (Jonsson et al., 2011; Naicker, Galambos, Zeng, Senthilselvan, & Colman, 2013; Quiroga, Janosz, Bisset, & Morin, 2013). Unfortunately, depression in youths is often undetected, and the undiagnosed are often misunderstood and regarded as troublemakers or as unwilling to try hard enough to perform academically (Belfer, 2008). Mental disorders account for a large proportion of the disease burden in young people of all societies (Gore et al., 2011). Therefore, early recognition is crucial in order to initiate timely treatment and implement appropriate follow‐up measures. The Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 (PHQ‐9) is a self‐administered instrument that was developed by Kroenke, Spitzer, and Williams (2001) to measure the severity of an individual's depression by evaluating the depressive episodes experienced by that individual in the past 2 weeks, using nine criteria based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM‐IV). Over the past decades, the PHQ‐9 is increasingly being used to determine the mental health of the general population and patient groups. The scale has been extensively validated in various adult populations, including clinical and community samples, and is well documented as having desirable psychometric properties. A recent systematic review concluded that the PHQ‐9 is a valid instrument for use in identifying, differentiating, and monitoring depressive disorders (Kroenke, Spitzer, Williams, & Löwe, 2010). The favorable psychometric properties of the PHQ‐9 have also been demonstrated across culturally diverse groups through various translated versions, including Chinese, Arabic, German, Portuguese, Spanish, Tanzanian, Thai, and Korean. However, such psychometric properties in adolescent samples remain underresearched. To date, there have been few studies on the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ‐9 in identifying depression in adolescents (Allgaier, Pietsch, Frühe, Sigl‐Glöckner, & Schutle‐Körne, 2012; Ganguly et al., 2013; Richardson et al., 2010; Tsai et al., 2014). In addition, the consistency of its factor structure remains unclear. Three previous studies using adolescent samples reported that the PHQ‐9 has a single factor (Burdzovic Andreas & Brunborg, 2017; Tsai et al., 2014; Yu, Tam, Wong, Lam, & Stewart, 2012), but mixed results have been reported on the equivalence of the meaning of items across genders. One study showed gender invariants in the PHQ‐9 in a Chinese sample from the general population, which included adolescents (Yu et al., 2012), whereas another study reported that the PHQ‐9 was measurement and scalar noninvariant across genders in a Norwegian adolescent sample (Burdzovic Andreas & Brunborg, 2017). To date, none of these studies have examined measurement invariants across different age subgroups within the period of adolescence, given that younger adolescents may not interpret the meaning of an item in the same way as their older counterparts. Although the PHQ‐9 can potentially facilitate comparisons across subpopulations, such as by gender, country, and age subgroup, it is a prerequisite for the items to have an equivalent meaning across the subpopulations under consideration. Thus, the current study sought to assess the usefulness of the PHQ‐9 by examining its underlying factor structure using a large community sample of adolescents in Hong Kong. The aim was to (a) confirm the single‐factor structure of the PHQ‐9 and (b) examine the factorial invariance of the one‐factor model across males and females and different age subgroups.

METHODS

Participants

This study is an analysis of secondary data derived from a cross‐sectional survey aimed at exploring adolescent mental health risks and protective factors (Mak & et al, 2014). Students from 16 secondary schools from two districts in Hong Kong were randomly selected and were recruited to take part in the study between 2011 and 2014. After written informed consent was obtained from both the students and their parents, the students were instructed to anonymously complete the self‐reported questionnaire. The survey was conducted by trained research assistants in a classroom setting with no teachers present. The students were assured that they could withdraw from the study at any time without penalty, that teachers and school principals would have no access to their responses, and that their data would be kept strictly confidential and used only for research purposes. Students who could not speak and read Chinese were excluded. The study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of the participating university (the ethical approval letter was obtained on 11 January 2011) and was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Of the 12 518 questionnaires that were collected, 522 did not contain all of the requested information on the PHQ‐9, and 1063 did not contain information about the respondent's age or contained information indicating that the respondent was aged ≥18. Consequently, the sample for the current study comprised 10 933 adolescents. The average age of the respondents was 14.8 years (standard deviation [SD] = 1.6), with the following age distribution: 11 (0.4%), 12 (10.7%), 13 (14.8%), 14 (16.4%), 15 (18.6%), 16 (21.4%), and 17 (17.8%). The sample consisted of 4847 males, 6038 females, and 48 respondents who did not provide information about their gender.

Measures

The PHQ‐9 was designed to measure the presence and severity of states of depression (Kroenke et al., 2001). The scale consists of nine items that assess the frequency with which nine depressive symptoms had occurred in the past 2 weeks, with items rated on a 4‐point Likert scale from “not at all” (0) to “nearly every day” (3). The responses to each item were summed to provide a single score ranging from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. According to the recommendation of Kroenke et al. (2001), depressive symptoms were classified by severity into five groups, namely, minimal (scores of 0‐4), mild (5‐9), moderate (10‐14), moderately severe (15‐19), and severe (20‐27). The Chinese version of the PHQ‐9 has demonstrated good psychometric properties in both adult and adolescent samples (Tsai et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2013). Anxiety was measured using the seven‐item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD‐7) developed by Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, and Lowe (2006), with items rated on a 4‐point Likert scale ranging from “not at all” (0) to “nearly every day” (3). An overall score of GAD‐7 was calculated by summing the responses from the seven items, giving a possible range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating a higher level of anxiety. The scale is reliable (α = .89) according to a previous study (Lowe et al., 2008), and the Cronbach alpha value of GAD‐7 in the present study was .917. Self‐esteem was measured using the Rosenberg Self‐esteem Scale (RSES; Rosenberg, 1986), which consists of 10 items rated on a 4‐point Likert scale ranging from “completely disagree” (1) to “completely agree” (4). RSES scores can range from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating a higher level of self‐esteem. The Chinese version of the RSES is a reliable and valid measure in Chinese adolescent samples (Song, Thompson, & Ferrer, 2009; Chen et al., 2017). The RSES has acceptable internal consistency in the present study (α = .868). Perceived control was assessed using the seven‐item Mastery Scale (Pearlin, Menaghan, Lieberma, & Mullan, 1981), which measures a person's general feeling of personal control over life events. Responses to all of the items were collected using a 5‐point Likert scale, ranging from “strongly disagree” (0) to “strongly agree” (4). Responses from all of the items were summed to produce the overall score, which had a possible range of 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating a higher level of perceived control. The psychometric properties of the scale were satisfactory in Chinese adolescent samples (Shek, 2006). The Cronbach alpha value of the scale was .749 in the current study.

Data analysis

The PHQ‐9 was evaluated in terms of its factor‐analytic structure, reliability, and construct validity. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) using Satorra‐Bentler robust maximum likelihood estimation procedure in the EQS package (Bentler, 2006) were conducted to fit a single‐factor model to the PHQ‐9 items. The model was first fitted without allowing for any residual correlations among items. Then, Lagrange multiplier (LM) tests were used to identify item pairs that would improve the fit of the model if they were allowed to correlate. The modification was theoretically plausible. Then, multiple‐group CFAs were performed to examine configural (an equal number of factors), metric (equal factor loadings), scalar (equal intercepts), and strict (equal error variances) invariances separately by gender and age. It was determined that there was a good fit between the model and the data, through the use of several fit indices, including (a) standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) ≤ 0.08, (b) robust comparative fit index (CFI) (R‐CFI) ≥ 0.95, and (c) robust root mean square approximation (RMSEA) (R‐RMSEA) ≤ 0.08 (Hu & Bentler, 1999). Measurement invariance was supported if reductions in the R‐CFI were: ΔR‐CFI ≤ 0.002 (Meade, Johnson, & Braddy, 2008). We combined the two age groups of 11 and 12 years old in the multiple group analysis, because only a few adolescents in the current sample were 11 years old. Cronbach alpha was used to assess the internal consistency of the PHQ‐9, and an alpha value of >.7 was considered a criterion of good reliability. The construct validity of the PHQ‐9, with the total sample, gender subsamples, and age subsamples, was examined using Pearson correlation coefficients between the PHQ‐9 score and the relevant measures, including GAD‐7, RSES, and Mastery. We hypothesized that PHQ‐9 scores would positively correlate with GAD‐7 scores and negatively correlate with RSES and Mastery scores.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows that the mean PHQ‐9 score was 6.65 (SD = 4.95) for the whole sample. Males obtained slightly lower mean scores than females in the PHQ‐9 (Cohen d = −.15; P < .001). Furthermore, the mean scores increased with age. The rates of the different severities of depressive symptoms, which were classified based on the recommendation by Kroenke et al. (2001) as minimal (scores of 0‐4), mild (5‐9), moderate (10‐14), moderately severe (15‐19), and severe (20‐27), were 38.9%, 37.3%, 16.1%, 5.5%, and 2.1%, respectively, for the whole sample. Males and females were similar in terms of rates of moderately severe/severe depressive symptoms (7.6% vs 5.7%, P = .81), but the rates increased with age, from 5.9% in adolescents aged 11 to 12 to 8.9% in adolescents aged 17.
Table 1

Descriptive statistics of PHQ‐9 scores

NMean SD Level of Severity
Minimal (0‐4)Mild (5‐9)Moderate (10‐14)Moderately severe (15‐19)Severe (≥20)
Whole sample10 9336.654.9538.9%37.3%16.1%5.5%2.1%
Gender
Male48476.265.0943.4%34.6%14.5%5.2%2.4%
Female60387.004.8035.3%39.4%17.5%5.7%2.0%
Age group, year
11‐1212075.204.8254.9%29.5%9.7%4.1%1.8%
1316155.814.9348.9%32.5%11.7%5.0%2.0%
1417896.374.7941.7%35.7%16.2%4.8%1.7%
1520366.874.9336.9%38.8%16.2%5.8%2.3%
1623387.224.9131.4%41.0%19.0%6.3%2.3%
1719487.574.9529.4%41.4%20.2%6.3%2.6%

Abbreviation: PHQ‐9, nine‐item Patient Health Questionnaire.

Descriptive statistics of PHQ‐9 scores Abbreviation: PHQ‐9, nine‐item Patient Health Questionnaire. A one‐factor model was fitted for the PHQ‐9 items with no specification of residual correlations (robust χ 2 = 1624.43, df = 27, SRMR = 0.043, R‐CFI = 0.916, and R‐RMSEA = 0.074). LM tests indicated an improvement in model fit if the residuals of three pairs of item errors were allowed to correlate: items 1 and 2, items 3 and 4, and items 7 and 8. The model was refitted with specifications of the three correlated item errors, thereby improving the fit of the model (robust χ 2 = 700.69, df = 24, SRMR = 0.029, R‐CFI = 0.957, and R‐RMSEA = 0.051). Based on the whole sample, standardized factor loadings for the items were moderately high, ranging from 0.531 to 0.742, and the three error correlations were minimal, ranging from 0.195 to 0.258. Table 2 shows that the one‐factor model with correlated item residuals for the PHQ‐9 items fit the data well in both gender samples and that the factor structure (configural), factor loadings (metric), item intercept (scalar), and error variances (strict) were invariant across genders. Another model with equal error covariances for males and females was tested, and the noninvariance of the three error covariances between males and females was also supported. Similarly, Table 3 shows that the one‐factor model with three error covariances for the PHQ‐9 items also fits the data well in all six age groups. In addition, configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariances with error covariances invariant across age groups were observed.
Table 2

Fit indices for the PHQ‐9 from confirmatory factor analyses by gender

NR‐χ 2 SRMRR‐RMSEAR‐CFIΔR‐CFI
Male4847313.4940.0300.0500.966
Female6086405.7360.0290.0510.963
Invariance test
Configural48714.7050.0290.0500.964
Metric56746.6990.0340.0480.9630.000
Scalar651009.2660.0340.0490.964−0.001
Strict751057.4590.0470.0490.9610.003
Strict + Error covariances781054.7670.0480.0480.9610.000

Abbreviations: CFI, comparative fit index; PHQ‐9, nine‐item Patient Health Questionnaire; R‐CFI, robust CFI; R‐RMSEA, robust root mean square error approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean square residual.

Table 3

Fit indices for the PHQ‐9 from confirmatory factor analyses by age

NR‐χ 2 SRMRR‐RMSEAR‐CFIΔR‐CFI
Age group
11‐12120782.490.0300.0450.944
131615122.300.0320.0500.962
141789123.490.0600.0480.964
152036108.480.0260.0420.975
162338145.200.0280.0460.972
171948219.320.0360.0650.948
Invariance test
Configural144789.940.0310.0500.963
Metric184858.660.0390.0450.962−0.000
Scalar2291403.310.0450.0470.963−0.001
Strict2791498.530.0540.0490.9610.002
Strict + Error covariances2941493.400.0530.0420.962−0.001

Abbreviations: CFI, comparative fit index; PHQ‐9, nine‐item Patient Health Questionnaire; R‐CFI, robust CFI; R‐RMSEA, robust root mean square error approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean square residual.

Fit indices for the PHQ‐9 from confirmatory factor analyses by gender Abbreviations: CFI, comparative fit index; PHQ‐9, nine‐item Patient Health Questionnaire; R‐CFI, robust CFI; R‐RMSEA, robust root mean square error approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean square residual. Fit indices for the PHQ‐9 from confirmatory factor analyses by age Abbreviations: CFI, comparative fit index; PHQ‐9, nine‐item Patient Health Questionnaire; R‐CFI, robust CFI; R‐RMSEA, robust root mean square error approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean square residual. The coefficient values of alpha for the whole sample was .859; those for the subsample of males and females were .866 and .852, respectively; and those for the age subsamples were .860, .860, .846, .857, .856, and .859 for the age groups 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17, respectively. As hypothesized, the PHQ‐9 scores correlated positively and strongly with anxiety (rs > .77, Ps < .001) and negatively and moderately with self‐esteem (rs < −.57, P < .001) and perceived control (rs < −.56, Ps < .001) in the whole sample, in the two gender subsamples, and in the six age subgroups (Table 4). The PHQ‐9 demonstrated satisfactory construct validity in this study sample.
Table 4

Correlations of PHQ‐9 with criteria measures by gender and age group subsamples

Whole sampleMaleFemaleAged 11–12Aged 13Aged 14Aged 15Aged 16Aged 17
Self‐esteem−.593−.581−.601−.601−.602−.580−.602−.590−.578
Mastery−.600−.591−.605−.593−.617−.569−.601−.608−.588
Anxiety.791.795.784.786.795.793.783.778.792

Note: All P values are <.001.

Abbreviation: PHQ‐9, nine‐item Patient Health Questionnaire.

Correlations of PHQ‐9 with criteria measures by gender and age group subsamples Note: All P values are <.001. Abbreviation: PHQ‐9, nine‐item Patient Health Questionnaire.

DISCUSSION

We examined the factor structure of the PHQ‐9 and investigated whether adolescents interpret and correspond to the items of the scale differently, depending on their gender and age. With a large community sample of adolescents, the CFA results supported a single‐factor structure for the PHQ‐9. We successfully replicated the result of the factor structure of the PHQ‐9 in female and male subsamples and in the six age‐group subsamples. Thus, the adolescents in this study showed that they interpreted the items on the scale in a similar manner, regardless of their gender and age. The internal consistency estimate and construct validity results for the PHQ‐9 were also satisfactory for the overall, gender, and age‐group subsamples. Most previous studies showed measurement invariances of the PHQ‐9 in adult samples (Galekamp, Stronks, Snijder, & Derks, 2017; Peterson et al., 2015; Schuler et al., 2018) and in the general population (Yu et al., 2012). Only one study examined the consistency of the factor structure of the PHQ‐9 using adolescent samples (Burdzovic Andreas & Brunborg, 2017). Hence, there have been few investigations on the measurement invariances of the scale according to both gender and age. Our results provide important information on the psychometric properties of the PHQ‐9. By separately demonstrating configural, measurement, scalar, and strict invariances across both genders and age subgroups, our study shows that the scale has a similar one‐factor structure for both males and females and for all six age groups of Chinese adolescents. Thus, the observed difference in gender or age in the PHQ‐9 scores among Chinese adolescents reflects a real difference, rather than factors related to the measurement of these symptoms. Similar to previous population‐based studies in Europe and Hong Kong (Galenkamp, Stronks, Snijder, & Derks 2017; Yu et al., 2012), the current study also found that the model fit improved substantially when the three error covariances (items 1 and 2, items 3 and 4, and items 7 and 8) were added to the model. Yu et al. (2012) had suggested the two possibilities—the wording of the items and the coexistence of symptoms—might have led to the observation of error covariances between the corresponding items. Another study of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) reported that the addition of the error covariance between items 3 and 4 to the one‐factor model yielded a good fit to the data on the PHQ‐9 items (Schuler et al., 2018). Meanwhile, Ishihara et al. (2019), using data from 7850 English‐speaking participants from 20 studies, also reported that the fit of the model improved when error covariances among items 3, 4, and 5 were added to the one‐factor model. A similar finding from these studies suggested that the coexistence of depressive symptoms may occur and that these symptoms may vary according to culture. Nevertheless, a further analysis of the coexistence of depressive symptoms is needed. With regard to the strength of this study, the representative sample of the target population of adolescents in Hong Kong, which contains large and diverse age groups, could ensure the generalizability of the findings of this study. However, the study has several limitations. First, it is a secondary analysis of a study with other primary research questions, and no golden standard, such as DSM‐IV, was used to assess depression. Therefore, criterion validity for the PHQ‐9 was not examined in this study. Second, considering the nature of the cross‐sectional design, we did not investigate the predictive power of the PHQ‐9 in the case of health‐related outcomes. Predictive power is one of the important psychometric properties of an instrument. Further studies to validate the scale using a more advanced study design, such as a longitudinal approach, are needed.
  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item for detecting major depression among adolescents.

Authors:  Laura P Richardson; Elizabeth McCauley; David C Grossman; Carolyn A McCarty; Julie Richards; Joan E Russo; Carol Rockhill; Wayne Katon
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Patient health questionnaire-9 as an effective tool for screening of depression among Indian adolescents.

Authors:  Samrat Ganguly; Moumita Samanta; Prithwish Roy; Sukanta Chatterjee; David W Kaplan; Bharati Basu
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Mental health outcome of long-term and episodic adolescent depression: 15-year follow-up of a community sample.

Authors:  U Jonsson; H Bohman; L von Knorring; G Olsson; A Paaren; A-L von Knorring
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.

Authors:  Robert L Spitzer; Kurt Kroenke; Janet B W Williams; Bernd Löwe
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-05-22

6.  Screening for depression in adolescents: validity of the patient health questionnaire in pediatric care.

Authors:  Antje-Kathrin Allgaier; Kathrin Pietsch; Barbara Frühe; Johanna Sigl-Glöckner; Gerd Schulte-Körne
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 6.505

7.  Child and adolescent mental disorders: the magnitude of the problem across the globe.

Authors:  Myron L Belfer
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 8.982

8.  Key Characteristics of Major Depressive Disorder Occurring in Childhood, Adolescence, Emerging Adulthood, Adulthood.

Authors:  Paul Rohde; Peter M Lewinsohn; Daniel N Klein; John R Seeley; Jeff M Gau
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-01

9.  Shortening self-report mental health symptom measures through optimal test assembly methods: Development and validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression-4.

Authors:  Miyabi Ishihara; Daphna Harel; Brooke Levis; Alexander W Levis; Kira E Riehm; Nazanin Saadat; Marleine Azar; Danielle B Rice; Tatiana A Sanchez; Matthew J Chiovitti; Pim Cuijpers; Simon Gilbody; John P A Ioannidis; Lorie A Kloda; Dean McMillan; Scott B Patten; Ian Shrier; Bruce Arroll; Charles H Bombardier; Peter Butterworth; Gregory Carter; Kerrie Clover; Yeates Conwell; Felicity Goodyear-Smith; Catherine G Greeno; John Hambridge; Patricia A Harrison; Marie Hudson; Nathalie Jetté; Kim M Kiely; Anthony McGuire; Brian W Pence; Alasdair G Rooney; Abbey Sidebottom; Adam Simning; Alyna Turner; Jennifer White; Mary A Whooley; Kirsty Winkley; Andrea Benedetti; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 8.128

10.  Measurement invariances of the PHQ-9 across gender and age groups in Chinese adolescents.

Authors:  Doris Y P Leung; Yim Wah Mak; Sau Fong Leung; Vico C L Chiang; Alice Yuen Loke
Journal:  Asia Pac Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.538

View more
  18 in total

1.  Mental health status of adolescents after family confinement during the COVID-19 outbreak in the general population: a longitudinal survey.

Authors:  Miao Qu; Kun Yang; Yujia Cao; Mei Hong Xiu; Xiang Yang Zhang
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.760

2.  Measurement invariances of the PHQ-9 across gender and age groups in Chinese adolescents.

Authors:  Doris Y P Leung; Yim Wah Mak; Sau Fong Leung; Vico C L Chiang; Alice Yuen Loke
Journal:  Asia Pac Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.538

3.  Psychometric Properties of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR) in Depressed Adolescents.

Authors:  Wu-Yang Zhang; Yan-Jie Zhao; Yao Zhang; Fan He; Hong-Qing Pan; Teris Cheung; Gabor S Ungvari; Shu-Ying Li; Yu-Tao Xiang
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Moving More and Sitting Less as Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors are Protective Factors for Insomnia, Depression, and Anxiety Among Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Chunping Lu; Xinli Chi; Kaixin Liang; Si-Tong Chen; Liuyue Huang; Tianyou Guo; Can Jiao; Qian Yu; Nicola Veronese; Fernanda Cunha Soares; Igor Grabovac; Albert Yeung; Liye Zou
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2020-12-17

5.  Mental health problems among Chinese adolescents during the COVID-19: The importance of nutrition and physical activity.

Authors:  Xinli Chi; Kaixin Liang; Si-Tong Chen; Qiaomin Huang; Liuyue Huang; Qian Yu; Can Jiao; Tianyou Guo; Brendon Stubbs; Md Mahbub Hossain; Albert Yeung; Zhaowei Kong; Liye Zou
Journal:  Int J Clin Health Psychol       Date:  2020-12-24

6.  Mental health problems, needs, and service use among people living within and outside Wuhan during the COVID-19 epidemic in China.

Authors:  Bao-Liang Zhong; De-Yi Zhou; Min-Fu He; Yi Li; Wen-Tian Li; Chee H Ng; Yu-Tao Xiang; Helen Fung-Kum Chiu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11

7.  Perceived Burdensomeness, Thwarted Belongingness, and Social Exclusion in Transgender Women: Psychometric Properties of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire.

Authors:  Yujie Liu; Rongxi Wang; Ruijie Chang; Huwen Wang; Lulu Xu; Chen Xu; Xiaoyue Yu; Shangbin Liu; Hui Chen; Yingjie Chen; Lian Jin; Ying Wang; Yong Cai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-10

8.  Migrant workers in China need emergency psychological interventions during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Authors:  Zi-Han Liu; Yan-Jie Zhao; Yuan Feng; Qinge Zhang; Bao-Liang Zhong; Teris Cheung; Brian J Hall; Yu-Tao Xiang
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 4.185

9.  Coping Styles for Mediating the Effect of Resilience on Depression Among Medical Students in Web-Based Classes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.

Authors:  Lina Zhao; Kristin Sznajder; Dan Cheng; Shimeng Wang; Can Cui; Xiaoshi Yang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Associations between feelings/behaviors during COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and depression/anxiety after lockdown in a sample of Chinese children and adolescents.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Song Yue; Xiaoran Hu; Jin Zhu; Zifan Wu; JianLi Wang; Yili Wu
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.839

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.