| Literature DB >> 32009726 |
R S Hindshaw1, M R Lindsay2,3, E S Boyd2,3.
Abstract
Microbial eukaryotes are increasingly being recognised for their role in global biogeochemical cycles, yet very few studies have focussed on their distribution in high-latitude stream sediments, an important habitat which influences stream water nutrient chemistry. In this study, we present the first comparison of microbial eukaryotes from two different polar habitats by determining the abundance and taxonomic affiliation of 18S rRNA gene fragments recovered from four sediment samples in Svalbard: two from a glaciated catchment and two from an unglaciated permafrost-dominated catchment. Whilst there was no difference between the two catchments in terms of Rao's phylogenetic diversity (0.18±0.04, 1SD), the glaciated catchment samples had slightly higher richness (138-139) than the unglaciated catchment samples (67-106). At the phylum level, Ciliophora had the highest relative abundance in the samples from the glaciated catchment (32-63%), but only comprised 0-17% of the unglaciated catchment samples. Bacillariophyta was the most abundant phylum in one of the samples from the unglaciated catchment (43%) but phototrophic microbial eukaryotes only formed a minor component of the glaciated catchment samples (<2%), suggesting that in these environments the microbial eukaryotes are predominantly heterotrophic (chemotrophic). This is in contrast to previously published data from Robertson Glacier, Canada where the relative abundance of chlorophyta (phototrophs) in three samples was 48-57%. The contrast may be due to differences in glacial hydrology and/or geology, highlighting the variation in microbial eukaryote communities between nominally similar environments.Entities:
Keywords: Chemotrophy; Eukarya; Glacier; Permafrost; Sediment; Svalbard
Year: 2017 PMID: 32009726 PMCID: PMC6961512 DOI: 10.1007/s00300-017-2106-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polar Biol ISSN: 0722-4060 Impact factor: 2.310
Compilation of previous microbial eukaryote sequencing studies from terrestrial polar environments
| Reference | Environment | Location | Study Accession Number | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Bachy et al. ( | Snow | North Pole | HQ438100–HQ438190 | Sanger |
| JF826314–JF826397 | ||||
|
Cameron et al. ( | Cryoconite | Kangerlussuaq, Greenland | GU297612–GU298216 | Sanger |
| Midre Lovenbreen, Svalbard | ||||
| Longyearbyen, Svalbard | ||||
| Vestfold Hills, Antarctica | ||||
| Signy Island, Antarctica | ||||
|
Cameron et al. ( | Snow | Thule, Greenland | PRJEB4904 | Sanger |
| Kangerlussuaq, Greenland | ||||
|
Christner et al. ( | Cryoconite | Dry Valleys, Antarctica | AY124360–124370 | Sanger |
|
Coolen et al. ( | Permafrost soil | Kuparuk River, Alaska | JF829151–JF829211 | Sanger |
|
Crump et al. ( | Soil water | Toolik Lake, Alaska | SRA049830 | Pyrotag |
| Headwater stream | ||||
| Lake inlet | ||||
| Epilimnion | ||||
| Hypolimnion | ||||
|
Hamilton et al. ( | Cryoconite | Robertson glacier, Canada | SAMN01729474–SAMN01729995 | Pyrotag |
| Snow | ||||
| Subglacial sed. | ||||
|
Harding et al. ( | Snow | Ellesmere Island, Canada | HQ230103–HQ230240 and | Sanger |
| HQ529495–HQ529499 | ||||
|
Jungblut et al. ( | Cyanobacteria mats | Ellesmere Island, Canada | JN207853–JN207906 | Sanger |
|
Luo et al. ( | Glacial meltwater | Austre Brøggerbreen, Svalbard | EU050744–EU050983 | Sanger |
|
Mackelprang et al. ( | Permafrost soil | Hess Creek, Alaska | 2067725009 | Meta |
|
Tveit et al. ( | Permafrost soil | Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard | SRP014474 | Meta |
|
Tveit et al. ( | Permafrost soil | Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard | SRR1509497–SRR1509498, SRR1509518 | Meta |
| and SRR1509520–SRR1509522 |
Sanger=Sanger amplicon sequencing, pyrotag=454 pyrotag amplicon sequencing, meta=metagenomics/metatranscriptomics sequencing
NCBI Genbank database,
The European Bioinformatics Institute
NCBI SRA database
IMG/M system
Fig. 1Topographic map of the sediment sampling locations. Contours are displayed at 50 m intervals. The red dashed lines demarcate the catchment boundaries. Dryadbreen is on the left and Fardalen on the right. Orange circles mark the locations where sediment samples for eukaryal 18S rRNA gene sequencing were collected. In the unglaciated catchment Fardalen, two samples were collected at the same location. The two locations are illustrated in photograph 2 by the letter of the sample name (L and M). The two samples collected from the glaciated catchment, Dryadbreen, were collected in different locations. These locations are illustrated by photographs 1 and 3 and the exact location of sampling is shown by the letter of the sample name (A or O). The red dot in the inset shows the location of the study area (Latitude, 78N; Longitude, 15E) in relation to the rest of Svalbard. The grey dot in the inset shows the location of Austre Brøggerbreen (Luo et al. 2009). (Color figure online)
Number of OTUs (proxy for species), estimated sequence coverage, phylogenetic diversity and template abundance associated with 18S rRNA genes sampled from four Svalbard sediment samples and three samples from Robertson Glacier, Canada
| Site | Sample | Richness | Coverage | Rao PD | Average templates (1SD) (gdws) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Svalbard | A | 138 | 0.89 | 0.21 | 1.62 | 9.93 |
| Svalbard | L | 106 | 0.93 | 0.20 | 1.65 | 3.39 |
| Svalbard | M | 67 | 0.95 | 0.12 | 6.93 | 1.21 |
| Svalbard | O | 139 | 0.89 | 0.17 | 5.49 | 5.62 |
| RG | Sub | 54 | 0.97 | 0.23 | 2.18 | 9.83 |
| RG | Cryo | 182 | 0.84 | 0.24 | 1.68 | 1.68 |
| RG | Snow | 103 | 0.92 | 0.18 | 6.01 | 6.01 |
Both studies employed the same primers, sequencing conditions and analysis methods
Richness is measured by the number of unique operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at the 97% sequence similarity
The percent of the predicted OTU richness, based on rarefaction analysis, that was sampled in the current study
Rao’s phylogenetic diversity
Fig. 2a Dendrogram based on the Rao among-community phylogenetic dissimilarity between the eukaryal communities associated with the different sediment samples. Samples O and A were collected in Dryadbreen (glaciated, red letters) and L and M were collected in Fardalen (unglaciated, blue letters). Samples ‘Sub’ (subglacial sediment), ‘Cryo’ (cryoconite) and snow were collected from Robertson Glacier, Canada. Sample M is distinct from the rest of the samples which form two clusters matching with the geographical region where the samples were collected. The Cophenetic coefficient for the dendrogram was 0.88. b Relative abundance of eukaryal phyla/subkingdoms based on percent identities of 18S rRNA genes to their closest cultivated sequence, as determined by BLASTn analysis. ‘Other’ includes phyla/subkingdoms comprising less than 5% of the total number of sequences (Ascomycota, Blastocladiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Porifera, Rhodophyta, Stramenopiles). (Color figure online)
Fig. 3The average number of templates, which is a proxy of the population size, for the microbial eukaryote and bacterial communities in each of the samples. The two communities for each sample are connected by a line. Each point is illustrated by a pie chart which depicts the relative abundance of bacteria (bac) or microbial eukaryotes (euk) inferred to be phototrophic or chemotrophic based on percent identities of 16S rRNA or 18S rRNA genes, respectively, to their closest cultivated sequence, as determined by BLASTn analysis. Samples O and A were collected in Dryadbreen (glaciated, red letters) and L and M were collected in Fardalen (unglaciated, blue letters). Bacteria data are taken from (Hindshaw et al. 2016a) and the calculation of the relative abundance of phototrophic and chemotrophic bacteria is described in Online Resource 3. (Color figure online)