Michelle R Xu1, Amanda M B Kelly2, Lawrence H Kushi3, Mary E Reed3, Howard K Koh4, Donna Spiegelman5. 1. Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia. Electronic address: mrx2@georgetown.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Oakland, Oakland, California. 4. Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act increases healthcare access and includes provisions that directly impact access to and cost of evidence-based colorectal cancer screening. The Affordable Care Act's removal of cost sharing for colorectal cancer screening as well as Medicaid expansion have been hypothesized to increase screening and improve other health outcomes. However, since its passage in 2010, there is little consensus on the Affordable Care Act's impact. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Data from March 2010 to June 2019 were reviewed and 21 relevant studies were identified; 19 studies examined colorectal cancer screening with most finding increased screening rates. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Eleven studies found significant increases, 5 found nonsignificant increases, 3 found nonsignificant decreases, and 1 study found a significant decrease in colorectal cancer screening. Three studies examined the impact on colorectal cancer incidence and stage of diagnosis, where a significant 2.4% increase in early diagnosis was found in one and a nonsignificant increase in incidence in another. However, survival improved after Medicaid expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Free preventive colorectal cancer screening and Medicaid expansion because of passage of the Affordable Care Act have been, in general, positively associated with modest improvements in screening rates across the country. Future studies are needed that investigate the longer-term impact of the Affordable Care Act on colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality rates, as screening is only the first step in treatment of cancerous and precancerous lesions, preventing them from progressing. Moreover, more studies examining subpopulations are needed to better assess where gaps in care remain.
CONTEXT: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act increases healthcare access and includes provisions that directly impact access to and cost of evidence-based colorectal cancer screening. The Affordable Care Act's removal of cost sharing for colorectal cancer screening as well as Medicaid expansion have been hypothesized to increase screening and improve other health outcomes. However, since its passage in 2010, there is little consensus on the Affordable Care Act's impact. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Data from March 2010 to June 2019 were reviewed and 21 relevant studies were identified; 19 studies examined colorectal cancer screening with most finding increased screening rates. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Eleven studies found significant increases, 5 found nonsignificant increases, 3 found nonsignificant decreases, and 1 study found a significant decrease in colorectal cancer screening. Three studies examined the impact on colorectal cancer incidence and stage of diagnosis, where a significant 2.4% increase in early diagnosis was found in one and a nonsignificant increase in incidence in another. However, survival improved after Medicaid expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Free preventive colorectal cancer screening and Medicaid expansion because of passage of the Affordable Care Act have been, in general, positively associated with modest improvements in screening rates across the country. Future studies are needed that investigate the longer-term impact of the Affordable Care Act on colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality rates, as screening is only the first step in treatment of cancerous and precancerous lesions, preventing them from progressing. Moreover, more studies examining subpopulations are needed to better assess where gaps in care remain.
Authors: S Zaza; L K Wright-De Agüero; P A Briss; B I Truman; D P Hopkins; M H Hennessy; D M Sosin; L Anderson; V G Carande-Kulis; S M Teutsch; M Pappaioanou Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Yasmin A Zerhouni; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Stuart Lipsitz; Joel Goldberg; Jennifer Irani; Ronald Bleday; Adil H Haider; Nelya Melnitchouk Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Gregory S Cooper; Tzuyung D Kou; Mark D Schluchter; Avi Dor; Siran M Koroukian Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-12-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Catherine Lee; Lawrence H Kushi; Mary E Reed; Elizabeth H Eldridge; Jeffrey K Lee; Jie Zhang; Donna Spiegelman Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Sarah P Huepenbecker; Shuangshuang Fu; Charlotte C Sun; Hui Zhao; Kristin M Primm; Sharon H Giordano; Larissa A Meyer Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 10.693
Authors: Chelsea A Obrochta; James D Murphy; Ming-Hsiang Tsou; Caroline A Thompson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Sanjay Shete; Yangyang Deng; Jackilen Shannon; Babalola Faseru; Deirdre Middleton; Ronaldo Iachan; Brittany Bernardo; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Sunny Jung Kim; Bin Huang; Morgan M Millar; Bernard Fuemmler; Jakob D Jensen; Jason A Mendoza; Jinxiang Hu; DeAnn Lazovich; Linda Robertson; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Electra D Paskett Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-10-01