Gregory S Cooper1,2, Tzuyung Doug Kou1, Avi Dor3, Siran M Koroukian2,4, Mark D Schluchter2. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio. 2. Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. 3. Department of Health Policy, George Washington University, Washington, DC. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Out-of-pocket expenditures are thought to be an important barrier to the receipt of cancer preventive services, especially for those of a lower socioeconomic status (SES). The Affordable Care Act (ACA) eliminated out-of-pocket expenditures for recommended services, including mammography and colonoscopy. The objective of this study was to determine changes in the uptake of mammography and colonoscopy among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries before and after ACA implementation. METHODS: Using Medicare claims data, this study identified women who were 70 years old or older and had not undergone mammography in the previous 2 years and men and women who were 70 years old or older, were at increased risk for colorectal cancer, and had not undergone colonoscopy in the past 5 years. The receipt of procedures in the 2-year period before the ACA's implementation (2009-2010) and after its implementation (2011 to September 2012) was also identified. Multivariate generalized estimating equation models were used to determine the independent association and county-level quartile of median income and education with the receipt of testing. RESULTS: For mammography, a lower SES quartile was associated with less uptake, but the post-ACA disparities were smaller than those in the pre-ACA period. In addition, mammography rates increased from the pre-ACA period to the post-ACA period in all SES quartiles. For colonoscopy, in both the pre- and post-ACA periods, there was an association between uptake and educational level and, to some extent, income. However, there were no appreciable changes in colonoscopy and SES after implementation of the ACA. CONCLUSIONS: The removal of out-of-pocket expenditures may overcome a barrier to the receipt of recommended preventive services, but for colonoscopy, other procedural factors may remain as deterrents. Cancer 2017;123:1585-1589.
BACKGROUND: Out-of-pocket expenditures are thought to be an important barrier to the receipt of cancer preventive services, especially for those of a lower socioeconomic status (SES). The Affordable Care Act (ACA) eliminated out-of-pocket expenditures for recommended services, including mammography and colonoscopy. The objective of this study was to determine changes in the uptake of mammography and colonoscopy among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries before and after ACA implementation. METHODS: Using Medicare claims data, this study identified women who were 70 years old or older and had not undergone mammography in the previous 2 years and men and women who were 70 years old or older, were at increased risk for colorectal cancer, and had not undergone colonoscopy in the past 5 years. The receipt of procedures in the 2-year period before the ACA's implementation (2009-2010) and after its implementation (2011 to September 2012) was also identified. Multivariate generalized estimating equation models were used to determine the independent association and county-level quartile of median income and education with the receipt of testing. RESULTS: For mammography, a lower SES quartile was associated with less uptake, but the post-ACA disparities were smaller than those in the pre-ACA period. In addition, mammography rates increased from the pre-ACA period to the post-ACA period in all SES quartiles. For colonoscopy, in both the pre- and post-ACA periods, there was an association between uptake and educational level and, to some extent, income. However, there were no appreciable changes in colonoscopy and SES after implementation of the ACA. CONCLUSIONS: The removal of out-of-pocket expenditures may overcome a barrier to the receipt of recommended preventive services, but for colonoscopy, other procedural factors may remain as deterrents. Cancer 2017;123:1585-1589.
Authors: Robert A Smith; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Durado Brooks; Mary Doroshenk; Stacey Fedewa; Debbie Saslow; Otis W Brawley; Richard Wender Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Cary P Gross; Martin S Andersen; Harlan M Krumholz; Gail J McAvay; Deborah Proctor; Mary E Tinetti Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joshua J Fenton; Weiwei Zhu; Steven Balch; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Paul Fishman; Rebecca A Hubbard Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Gregory S Cooper; Tzuyung D Kou; Mark D Schluchter; Avi Dor; Siran M Koroukian Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-12-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Shivan J Mehta; Daniel Polsky; Jingsan Zhu; James D Lewis; Jonathan T Kolstad; George Loewenstein; Kevin G Volpp Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Madina Agénor; Gabriel R Murchison; Jarvis T Chen; Deborah J Bowen; Meredith B Rosenthal; Sebastien Haneuse; Sydney Bryn Austin Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2019-11-10 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Michelle R Xu; Amanda M B Kelly; Lawrence H Kushi; Mary E Reed; Howard K Koh; Donna Spiegelman Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: J Bliton; P Muscarella; P Friedmann; M Parides; K Papalezova; J C McAuliffe; H In Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Jonathan S Slater; Michael J Parks; Christina L Nelson; Kelly D Hughes Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2018-06-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Stella K Kang; Miao Jiang; Richard Duszak; Samantha L Heller; Danny R Hughes; Linda Moy Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 11.105