Literature DB >> 32007438

Current immunoassay methods and their applications to clinically used biomarkers of breast cancer.

Seri Jeong1, Min-Jeong Park2, Wonkeun Song3, Hyon-Suk Kim4.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with a higher incidence in developed countries. The biomarkers for breast cancer such as estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, CA (cancer antigen) 15-3, CA 27.29, and carcinoembryonic antigen have been recommended for use in the laboratory based on the guidelines of American and European societies. Immunoassays have been frequently and consistently used to detect these clinically established biomarkers of breast cancer. Despite the higher accessibility of serum biomarkers, including CA 15-3, CA 27.29, and CEA, compared to tissue markers, variations in immunoassays affect their standardization and clinical utility. When reviewing the immunoassays used to detect these serum markers, we found that the most frequently used immunoassay was enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, followed by electrochemiluminescent immunoassay, and then chemiluminescence immunoassay for CA 15-3 and CEA. Meanwhile, the chemiluminescence immunoassay was the most common technique for CA27.29. The electrochemiluminescent immunoassay and monoclonal fluorometric assay have become the preferred methods in 2010-2019 compared to 2000-2009. Analytical and clinical performance factors such as sensitivity, specificity, detection limit, hazard risk to laboratory personnel, speed, and economic feasibility influenced these changes in user preference. When using the immunoassays, there should be a comprehensive understanding of the principles, advantages, vulnerability, and precautions for interpretation. In the future, a combination of immunological biomarkers and genetic platforms will benefit patients with breast cancer by facilitating prognosis prediction and guiding therapeutic intervention.
Copyright © 2020 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Breast cancer; CA 15-3; CA 27.29; CEA; Immunoassay

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32007438     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  6 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances on applications of immunosensing systems based on nanomaterials for CA15-3 breast cancer biomarker detection.

Authors:  Ika Kustiyah Oktaviyanti; Diyar Salahuddin Ali; Sura A Awadh; Maria Jade Catalan Opulencia; Shukhrat Yusupov; Rui Dias; Fahad Alsaikhan; Mais Mahmood Mohammed; Himanshu Sharma; Yasser Fakri Mustafa; Marwan Mahmood Saleh
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 2.  Establishment of injury models in studies of biological effects induced by microwave radiation.

Authors:  Yun-Fei Lai; Hao-Yu Wang; Rui-Yun Peng
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2021-02-18

3.  The High Prevalence of Short-Term Elevation of Tumor Markers Due to Hyperglycemia in Diabetic Patients.

Authors:  Xi-Yu Liu
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.249

4.  High Prevalence of Abnormal Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Diabetic Inpatients with Poor Glycemic Control.

Authors:  Xi-Yu Liu; Chai Jin; Yan Zhou
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.249

5.  Analysis of Temperature-Jump Boundary Conditions on Heat Transfer for Heterogeneous Microfluidic Immunosensors.

Authors:  Fraj Echouchene; Thamraa Al-Shahrani; Hafedh Belmabrouk
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Electrochemical Nanobiosensors for Detection of Breast Cancer Biomarkers.

Authors:  Veronika Gajdosova; Lenka Lorencova; Peter Kasak; Jan Tkac
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.