Literature DB >> 32006009

Increased Iron Status during a Feeding Trial of Iron-Biofortified Beans Increases Physical Work Efficiency in Rwandan Women.

Sarah V Luna1, Laura M Pompano1, Mercy Lung'aho2, Jean Bosco Gahutu3, Jere D Haas1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Iron-biofortified staple foods can improve iron status and resolve iron deficiency. However, whether improved iron status from iron biofortification can improve physical performance remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine whether changes in iron status from an iron-biofortified bean intervention affect work efficiency.
METHODS: A total of 125 iron-depleted (ferritin <20 μg/L) female Rwandan university students (18-26 y) were selected from a larger sample randomly assigned to consume iron-biofortified beans (Fe-Bean; 86.1 mg Fe/kg) or conventional beans (control: 50.6 mg Fe/kg) twice daily for 18 wk (average of 314 g beans consumed/d). Blood biomarkers of iron status (primary outcome) and physical work efficiency (secondary outcome) were measured before and after the intervention. Work performed was assessed during 5-min steady-state periods at 0-, 25-, and 40-W workloads using a mechanically braked cycle ergometer. Work efficiency was calculated at 25 W and 40 W as the work accomplished divided by the energy expended at that workload above that expended at 0 W. General linear models were used to evaluate the relation between changes in iron status biomarkers and work efficiency.
RESULTS: The Fe-Bean intervention had significant positive effects on hemoglobin, serum ferritin, and body iron stores but did not affect work efficiency. However, 18-wk change in hemoglobin was positively related to work efficiency at 40 W in the full sample (n = 119; estimate: 0.24 g/L; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.48 g/L; P = 0.044) and among women who were anemic (hemoglobin <120 g/L) at baseline (n = 43; estimate: 0.64 g/L; 95% CI: 0.05, 1.23 g/L; P = 0.036). Among women who were nonanemic at baseline, change in serum ferritin was positively related to change in work efficiency at 40 W (n = 60; estimate: 0.50 μg/L; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.95 μg/L; P = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing iron status during an iron-biofortified bean feeding trial improves work efficiency in iron-depleted, sedentary women. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01594359.
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rwanda; anemia; biofortification; energetic work efficiency; iron deficiency; physical performance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32006009      PMCID: PMC7198300          DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxaa016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  24 in total

1.  Muscular efficiency during steady-rate exercise: effects of speed and work rate.

Authors:  G A Gaesser; G A Brooks
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Exercise efficiency of low power output cycling.

Authors:  M Reger; J E Peterman; R Kram; W C Byrnes
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 4.221

3.  2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values.

Authors:  Barbara E Ainsworth; William L Haskell; Stephen D Herrmann; Nathanael Meckes; David R Bassett; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Jennifer L Greer; Jesse Vezina; Melicia C Whitt-Glover; Arthur S Leon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Iron supplementation maintains ventilatory threshold and improves energetic efficiency in iron-deficient nonanemic athletes.

Authors:  P S Hinton; L M Sinclair
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Blood volume and hemoglobin concentration as determinants of maximal aerobic power.

Authors:  I L Kanstrup; B Ekblom
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  A Randomized Trial of Iron-Biofortified Pearl Millet in School Children in India.

Authors:  Julia L Finkelstein; Saurabh Mehta; Shobha A Udipi; Padmini S Ghugre; Sarah V Luna; Michael J Wenger; Laura E Murray-Kolb; Eric M Przybyszewski; Jere D Haas
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Random serial sampling to evaluate efficacy of iron fortification: a randomized controlled trial of margarine fortification with ferric pyrophosphate or sodium iron edetate.

Authors:  Maria Andersson; Winfried Theis; Michael B Zimmermann; Jasmin Tajeri Foman; Martin Jäkel; Guus S M J E Duchateau; Leon G J Frenken; Richard F Hurrell
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Iron supplementation improves energetic efficiency in iron-depleted female rowers.

Authors:  Diane M DellaValle; Jere D Haas
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Serum transferrin receptor: a quantitative measure of tissue iron deficiency.

Authors:  B S Skikne; C H Flowers; J D Cook
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1990-05-01       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Mineral biofortification strategies for food staples: the example of common bean.

Authors:  Matthew W Blair
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 5.279

View more
  3 in total

1.  Scaling Up Delivery of Biofortified Staple Food Crops Globally: Paths to Nourishing Millions.

Authors:  Jennifer K Foley; Kristina D Michaux; Bho Mudyahoto; Laira Kyazike; Binu Cherian; Olatundun Kalejaiye; Okonkwo Ifeoma; Paul Ilona; Chelsea Reinberg; Donald Mavindidze; Erick Boy
Journal:  Food Nutr Bull       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.069

2.  Do Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Promote Good Health in Humans? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Eileen Bogweh Nchanji; Odhiambo Collins Ageyo
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  The acceptance of zinc biofortified rice in Latin America: A consumer sensory study and grain quality characterization.

Authors:  Bo-Jane Woods; Sonia Gallego-Castillo; Elise F Talsma; Daniel Álvarez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.